The Persona of the Entomologist in Architectural Education

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Andrew P. Steen
{"title":"The Persona of the Entomologist in Architectural Education","authors":"Andrew P. Steen","doi":"10.18848/1833-1874/CGP/V12I01/27-40","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Atelier Bow-Wow’s book \"Echo of Space/Space of Echo\" (2009) contains a chapter titled \"Insect-Hunting.\" The four-page section begins with recollections of a childhood pastime—researching, hunting, collecting, and cataloguing insects—and extends into a theoretical positioning of Momoyo Kaijima and Yoshiharu Tsukamoto’s architectural, pedagogical, and publishing practices. It describes an approach related to Jakob von Uexkull and Georg Kriszat’s treatment of \"Umwelt\" and building on Bernard Rudofsky’s framing of vernacular environments in \"Architecture without Architects\" (1966). \"Insect-Hunting\" raises a question: what can entomological approaches bring to architectural design education? This article is composed of four sections. The first section briefly positions the field of entomology and establishes the figure of the entomologist that will subsequently be built upon. The second section interrogates the figure of the entomologist by reflecting on two fictional insect collectors, Junpei Niki and Frederick Clegg, extracting common traits. The third section performs an analysis of the work of Atelier Bow-Wow in relation to the practice of an entomologist: it elaborates Kaijima and Tsukamoto’s analogy between insects and buildings and posits a set of qualities that result from this association. The fourth and final section considers work produced in a studio conducted at the University of Tasmania in 2017 that appropriated entomology and the entomologist to investigate terrace houses in Launceston, Australia. Using Robert Somol and Sarah Whiting’s \"cool\" architectural concept, it positions the channelling of this persona within architectural methodology.","PeriodicalId":38677,"journal":{"name":"Design Principles and Practices","volume":"32 1","pages":"27-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Design Principles and Practices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18848/1833-1874/CGP/V12I01/27-40","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Atelier Bow-Wow’s book "Echo of Space/Space of Echo" (2009) contains a chapter titled "Insect-Hunting." The four-page section begins with recollections of a childhood pastime—researching, hunting, collecting, and cataloguing insects—and extends into a theoretical positioning of Momoyo Kaijima and Yoshiharu Tsukamoto’s architectural, pedagogical, and publishing practices. It describes an approach related to Jakob von Uexkull and Georg Kriszat’s treatment of "Umwelt" and building on Bernard Rudofsky’s framing of vernacular environments in "Architecture without Architects" (1966). "Insect-Hunting" raises a question: what can entomological approaches bring to architectural design education? This article is composed of four sections. The first section briefly positions the field of entomology and establishes the figure of the entomologist that will subsequently be built upon. The second section interrogates the figure of the entomologist by reflecting on two fictional insect collectors, Junpei Niki and Frederick Clegg, extracting common traits. The third section performs an analysis of the work of Atelier Bow-Wow in relation to the practice of an entomologist: it elaborates Kaijima and Tsukamoto’s analogy between insects and buildings and posits a set of qualities that result from this association. The fourth and final section considers work produced in a studio conducted at the University of Tasmania in 2017 that appropriated entomology and the entomologist to investigate terrace houses in Launceston, Australia. Using Robert Somol and Sarah Whiting’s "cool" architectural concept, it positions the channelling of this persona within architectural methodology.
建筑教育中昆虫学家的角色
工作室Bow-Wow的书《空间的回声/回声的空间》(2009)中有一章名为“昆虫狩猎”。这本四页的书从回忆童年的消遣开始——研究、狩猎、收集昆虫,并对昆虫进行分类——然后延伸到对海岛Momoyo Kaijima和Tsukamoto Yoshiharu的建筑、教学和出版实践的理论定位。它描述了一种与Jakob von Uexkull和Georg Kriszat对“Umwelt”的处理有关的方法,并建立在Bernard Rudofsky在“没有建筑师的建筑”(1966)中对乡土环境的框架上。“昆虫狩猎”提出了一个问题:昆虫学方法能给建筑设计教育带来什么?本文由四个部分组成。第一部分简要地定位了昆虫学领域,并建立了昆虫学家的形象,这将是随后建立的基础。第二部分通过对两个虚构的昆虫收藏家Junpei Niki和Frederick Clegg的反思来询问昆虫学家的形象,从中提取出共同的特征。第三部分分析了Bow-Wow工作室的工作与昆虫学家的实践有关:它阐述了Kaijima和Tsukamoto在昆虫和建筑之间的类比,并提出了这种联系所产生的一系列品质。第四部分也是最后一部分考虑了2017年在塔斯马尼亚大学的一个工作室制作的作品,该工作室利用昆虫学和昆虫学家来调查澳大利亚朗塞斯顿的排屋。使用Robert Somol和Sarah Whiting的“酷”建筑概念,它在建筑方法论中定位了这个角色的通道。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Design Principles and Practices
Design Principles and Practices Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信