{"title":"Scholasticism with a transdisciplinary attitude","authors":"P. Gibbs","doi":"10.22545/2021/00161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper considers how we might understand Nicolescu’s transdisciplinary approach to being in the world through a scholastic metaphysics, to ground Nicolescu’s ontology in a different historic epoch. By way of interpretation, I want to suggest that Nicolescu’s three axioms of multiple levels of reality, the hidden third and the logic of the included middle emergent in complexity can be enriched by Duns Scotus’ notion of univocity and formal distinction. Patterning together, they offer a metaphysics basis of transdisciplinarity which is not reliant on a scientific rationality for its feasibility (nor being in competition with such a deconstructing position) through the rigour of the scholastic method. It takes as it focus the idea of a transdisciplinary attitude and suggests that Scotist realism, and scholasticism more generally, could provide an illuming way of viewing a transdisciplinary educational project. This is a speculative paper is about being, potentiality and the framing of being within the paradigm of metaphysical scholasticism inspired by the transdisciplinary maxims axioms of Nicolescu[1]. \n \n[1] The axioms were first formally discussed in Nicolescu’s Nous, la particule et le monde [2} For an excellent discussion of Nicolecsu’s vision and that of others in the field of transdisciplinarity, see McGregor, 2015) [3]","PeriodicalId":33887,"journal":{"name":"Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering Science","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22545/2021/00161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
This paper considers how we might understand Nicolescu’s transdisciplinary approach to being in the world through a scholastic metaphysics, to ground Nicolescu’s ontology in a different historic epoch. By way of interpretation, I want to suggest that Nicolescu’s three axioms of multiple levels of reality, the hidden third and the logic of the included middle emergent in complexity can be enriched by Duns Scotus’ notion of univocity and formal distinction. Patterning together, they offer a metaphysics basis of transdisciplinarity which is not reliant on a scientific rationality for its feasibility (nor being in competition with such a deconstructing position) through the rigour of the scholastic method. It takes as it focus the idea of a transdisciplinary attitude and suggests that Scotist realism, and scholasticism more generally, could provide an illuming way of viewing a transdisciplinary educational project. This is a speculative paper is about being, potentiality and the framing of being within the paradigm of metaphysical scholasticism inspired by the transdisciplinary maxims axioms of Nicolescu[1].
[1] The axioms were first formally discussed in Nicolescu’s Nous, la particule et le monde [2} For an excellent discussion of Nicolecsu’s vision and that of others in the field of transdisciplinarity, see McGregor, 2015) [3]
本文探讨了我们如何通过学院派形而上学来理解尼科莱斯库的跨学科的存在方式,从而将尼科莱斯库的本体论置于一个不同的历史时代。通过解释,我想建议Nicolescu关于现实的多重层次的三个公理,隐藏的第三和包含在复杂性中的中间涌现的逻辑可以通过Duns Scotus的单一性和形式区别的概念来丰富。它们结合在一起,通过严谨的学术方法,提供了一个跨学科的形而上学基础,而不是依赖于其可行性的科学合理性(也不是与这种解构立场相竞争)。它集中了跨学科态度的思想,并建议苏格兰现实主义,以及更普遍的经院哲学,可以提供一种观察跨学科教育项目的启发性方式。这是一篇关于存在,潜力和存在框架的思辩论文,在形而上学经院哲学的范式中,受到跨学科格言Nicolescu[1]公理的启发。这些公理首次在nicolessu的Nous, la particle et le monde中被正式讨论[2]关于Nicolecsu的愿景和其他跨学科领域的观点的精彩讨论,参见McGregor, 2015) [3]