Prediction of Academic Staffs’ Organizational Silence through their Power Distance Perceptions

Aycan Cicek Saglam, Yılmaz İlker Yorulmaz, Burcu Turkkas Anasiz, İ. Çolak, Nahide Nur Dumlu
{"title":"Prediction of Academic Staffs’ Organizational Silence through their Power Distance Perceptions","authors":"Aycan Cicek Saglam, Yılmaz İlker Yorulmaz, Burcu Turkkas Anasiz, İ. Çolak, Nahide Nur Dumlu","doi":"10.22521/UNIBULLETIN.2018.72.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aimed to determine the role of power distance perceptions of academic staff working in faculties of education on their organizational silence. The population of the study consisted of 8,978 academic staff working at education faculties of universities in seven geographical regions of Turkey during the 2016-2017 academic year. Simple random sampling technique was employed in the study. The data of the study were collected through online questionnaires. The “Organizational Power Distance Scale” and “Organizational Silence Scale” were used as the data collection instruments in the research. Within the scope of this study, Organizational Silence Scale were adapted to Turkish language. The analyses were conducted with 481 eligible returned questionnaires. According to the regression analysis results, the dimensions of power distance perceptions of academic staff as a whole gave a medium positive and significant relationship with acquiescent silence and defensive silence, with a low positive and significant relationship with prosocial silence. Acceptance of power, instrumental use of power, and acquiescence of power were seen to be predictors of acquiescent silence and defensive silence, whereas only acceptance of power was found to be a significant predictor of prosocial silence. Academic staffs’ justification of power had no significant effect on their organizational silence. The power distance perceptions of the academic staff explained 24.4% of the total variance of their acquiescent silence, 35% of their defensive silence, and 2.3% of their prosocial","PeriodicalId":31152,"journal":{"name":"Universitepark Bulten","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Universitepark Bulten","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22521/UNIBULLETIN.2018.72.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This research aimed to determine the role of power distance perceptions of academic staff working in faculties of education on their organizational silence. The population of the study consisted of 8,978 academic staff working at education faculties of universities in seven geographical regions of Turkey during the 2016-2017 academic year. Simple random sampling technique was employed in the study. The data of the study were collected through online questionnaires. The “Organizational Power Distance Scale” and “Organizational Silence Scale” were used as the data collection instruments in the research. Within the scope of this study, Organizational Silence Scale were adapted to Turkish language. The analyses were conducted with 481 eligible returned questionnaires. According to the regression analysis results, the dimensions of power distance perceptions of academic staff as a whole gave a medium positive and significant relationship with acquiescent silence and defensive silence, with a low positive and significant relationship with prosocial silence. Acceptance of power, instrumental use of power, and acquiescence of power were seen to be predictors of acquiescent silence and defensive silence, whereas only acceptance of power was found to be a significant predictor of prosocial silence. Academic staffs’ justification of power had no significant effect on their organizational silence. The power distance perceptions of the academic staff explained 24.4% of the total variance of their acquiescent silence, 35% of their defensive silence, and 2.3% of their prosocial
权力距离感知对学术人员组织沉默的预测
本研究旨在探讨在教育学院工作的学术人员的权力距离知觉对其组织沉默的影响。该研究的人口包括2016-2017学年在土耳其七个地理区域的大学教育学院工作的8,978名学术人员。本研究采用简单随机抽样方法。该研究的数据是通过在线问卷收集的。本研究采用“组织权力距离量表”和“组织沉默量表”作为数据收集工具。在本研究范围内,组织沉默量表适用于土耳其语。对481份符合条件的问卷进行分析。回归分析结果显示,教职员工权力距离知觉各维度总体上与默许性沉默和防御性沉默呈中等正相关,与亲社会沉默呈低正相关。对权力的接受、权力的工具性使用和对权力的默认被认为是默认沉默和防御性沉默的预测因子,而只有对权力的接受被认为是亲社会沉默的显著预测因子。学术人员的权力正当性对其组织沉默没有显著影响。教职员工的权力距离感知解释了其默许沉默总方差的24.4%,解释了其防御沉默总方差的35%,解释了其亲社会沉默总方差的2.3%
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书