Effect of resistant starch type 4 from different starch sources on the physical properties and palatability of bread

Q4 Engineering
R. Shimada, M. Yoshimura
{"title":"Effect of resistant starch type 4 from different starch sources on the physical properties and palatability of bread","authors":"R. Shimada, M. Yoshimura","doi":"10.17106/JBR.35.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Resistant starch (RS) displays physiological properties similar to that of dietary fiber. In this study, the physical properties and palatability of bread made with RS type 4 (RS-4, chemically modified starch) were evaluated. Distarch phosphate potato starch, distarch phosphate rice starch, distarch phosphate tapioca starch, phosphated dis tarch phosphate sweet potato starch, and phosphated dis tarch phosphate wheat starch were the sources. Wheat flour was replaced with 20% (w/w) RS-4, and the bread was thereby considered as RS-4 added bread. Bread without RS-4 was the control bread. RS-4 added loaves of bread had less specific volume than the control bread. The hard ness of RS-4 added bread samples was also higher than that of the control bread. It was observed using a scanning elec tron microscope (SEM) that RS-4 was not gelatinized in bread. However, RS-4 added bread samples obtained over all acceptability comparable to that of the control bread in the sensory evaluation. It was concluded that differences in the sizes of starch particles added to the bread did not affect palatability. The RS-4 bread with potatoes starch appeared to cause the hardness of the crumb during baking; suggest ing that RS-4 derived from cereals would be more suitable for use in bread.","PeriodicalId":39272,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biorheology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biorheology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17106/JBR.35.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Resistant starch (RS) displays physiological properties similar to that of dietary fiber. In this study, the physical properties and palatability of bread made with RS type 4 (RS-4, chemically modified starch) were evaluated. Distarch phosphate potato starch, distarch phosphate rice starch, distarch phosphate tapioca starch, phosphated dis tarch phosphate sweet potato starch, and phosphated dis tarch phosphate wheat starch were the sources. Wheat flour was replaced with 20% (w/w) RS-4, and the bread was thereby considered as RS-4 added bread. Bread without RS-4 was the control bread. RS-4 added loaves of bread had less specific volume than the control bread. The hard ness of RS-4 added bread samples was also higher than that of the control bread. It was observed using a scanning elec tron microscope (SEM) that RS-4 was not gelatinized in bread. However, RS-4 added bread samples obtained over all acceptability comparable to that of the control bread in the sensory evaluation. It was concluded that differences in the sizes of starch particles added to the bread did not affect palatability. The RS-4 bread with potatoes starch appeared to cause the hardness of the crumb during baking; suggest ing that RS-4 derived from cereals would be more suitable for use in bread.
不同淀粉来源的4型抗性淀粉对面包物理性质和适口性的影响
抗性淀粉(RS)具有与膳食纤维相似的生理特性。本研究对RS-4型(RS-4,化学变性淀粉)制成的面包的物理性能和适口性进行了评价。磷酸二淀粉马铃薯淀粉、磷酸二淀粉大米淀粉、磷酸二淀粉木薯淀粉、磷酸焦淀粉甘薯淀粉和磷酸焦淀粉小麦淀粉为主要来源。用20% (w/w)的RS-4代替小麦粉,将该面包视为添加RS-4的面包。不含RS-4的面包为对照面包。添加RS-4的面包比对照面包的比容小。添加RS-4的面包样品硬度也高于对照面包。用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)观察到RS-4在面包中未发生糊化。但是,RS-4添加后的面包样品在感官评价上获得的可接受性与对照面包相当。由此得出结论,添加到面包中的淀粉颗粒大小的差异并不影响其适口性。添加马铃薯淀粉的RS-4面包在烘烤过程中出现了使面包屑变硬的现象;这表明从谷物中提取的RS-4更适合用于面包。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Biorheology
Journal of Biorheology Engineering-Mechanical Engineering
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信