Complexidade institucional: um estudo bibliométrico na publicação recente em teoria institucional

F. Silva, João Marcelo Crubellate
{"title":"Complexidade institucional: um estudo bibliométrico na publicação recente em teoria institucional","authors":"F. Silva, João Marcelo Crubellate","doi":"10.21529/RECADM.2016009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this bibliometric study we discuss the institutional complexity in eleven journals in business administration and organization studies. We try to identify the main features of the present Institutional Theory discussion in organization theory. The main research techniques we used were citation, co-citation, factorial bibliometric analysis and multidimensional scaling to identify the most influential studies and the main themes that are interwoven in institutional complexity (institutional logics, conflicts, changes and identity). The sample consisted of 43 articles and more than 3000 references cited. The most cited works were grouped into three factors that represent the emergent topics in institutional complexity. The results show the emergence of a new set of important concepts in the context of the institutional theory, such as institutional logics, conflict, change, identity, strategy. That set of concepts is diverse from that one typical of the institutionalism in organizations, in the 90´s. Complementarily, we identify authors and papers that can be considered central in organizational institutionalism, according to the journals that we take as part of our sample.","PeriodicalId":30138,"journal":{"name":"Revista Eletronica de Ciencia Administrativa","volume":"15 1","pages":"116-132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Eletronica de Ciencia Administrativa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21529/RECADM.2016009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

In this bibliometric study we discuss the institutional complexity in eleven journals in business administration and organization studies. We try to identify the main features of the present Institutional Theory discussion in organization theory. The main research techniques we used were citation, co-citation, factorial bibliometric analysis and multidimensional scaling to identify the most influential studies and the main themes that are interwoven in institutional complexity (institutional logics, conflicts, changes and identity). The sample consisted of 43 articles and more than 3000 references cited. The most cited works were grouped into three factors that represent the emergent topics in institutional complexity. The results show the emergence of a new set of important concepts in the context of the institutional theory, such as institutional logics, conflict, change, identity, strategy. That set of concepts is diverse from that one typical of the institutionalism in organizations, in the 90´s. Complementarily, we identify authors and papers that can be considered central in organizational institutionalism, according to the journals that we take as part of our sample.
制度复杂性:最近出版的《制度理论》中的文献计量研究
本文以文献计量学方法探讨了11种工商管理与组织研究期刊的制度复杂性。我们试图找出当前组织理论中制度理论讨论的主要特征。我们使用的主要研究技术是引用、共被引、因子文献计量分析和多维尺度分析,以确定最具影响力的研究和交织在制度复杂性(制度逻辑、冲突、变化和认同)中的主题。样本包括43篇文章和3000多篇被引用的参考文献。被引用最多的作品被分为三个因素,代表了制度复杂性中的新兴主题。研究结果显示,在制度理论的背景下,出现了一组新的重要概念,如制度逻辑、冲突、变化、认同、战略。这组概念不同于90年代组织中典型的制度主义。此外,根据我们作为样本一部分的期刊,我们确定了可以被认为是组织制度主义中心的作者和论文。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信