Problemas éticos en el manejo del dolor. Estudio cualitativo mediante entrevista de reflexión abierta.

Q4 Medicine
Jaime Boceta, A. Peiró, F. J. Cevas, Loreto M Vidal, M. Acedo, V. Mayoral
{"title":"Problemas éticos en el manejo del dolor. Estudio cualitativo mediante entrevista de reflexión abierta.","authors":"Jaime Boceta, A. Peiró, F. J. Cevas, Loreto M Vidal, M. Acedo, V. Mayoral","doi":"10.20986/resed.2020.3729/2019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The medical practice in the area of pain associates ethical problems in the care of patients with a disease that causes a functional deterioration, with an uncertain prognosis for their labor reintegration, and a great consumption of family and social resources. After the creation of a working group on bioethics within the Spanish Society of Pain (SED), an attempt is made to analyze these problems. Objective: To know which are the ethical problems that identify professionals (clinical practice, environment and institutions) which concerns SED members; encouranging an ethical reflection. Methodology: Qualitative study, based on a semi-structured, open interview, sent to members of the SED (n░=░1035), through electronic access, on 4 bioethical aspects: the problems detected in clinical practice, the problems of the work environment, the problems in the work organizations, and possible suggestions. These are grouped as they refer to the indications (beneficence and non-maleficence), justice (understood as equity), autonomy (information and preferences). Results: A total of 6░% professionals participated in the interview (n░=░62/1035). A panel was prepared with the 10 main issues identified (Top10). They emphasize the uncertainty in the taking of decisions in the therapeutic, the limitation of the therapeutic effort, the conditioning of the sanitary system, the relations with the pharmaceutical industry and the search of the excellence. Conclusions: This qualitative study allows identifying ethical problems that interest professionals dedicated to pain. It is convenient to confirm and size them through quantitative studies.","PeriodicalId":35974,"journal":{"name":"Revista de la Sociedad Espanola del Dolor","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de la Sociedad Espanola del Dolor","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20986/resed.2020.3729/2019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The medical practice in the area of pain associates ethical problems in the care of patients with a disease that causes a functional deterioration, with an uncertain prognosis for their labor reintegration, and a great consumption of family and social resources. After the creation of a working group on bioethics within the Spanish Society of Pain (SED), an attempt is made to analyze these problems. Objective: To know which are the ethical problems that identify professionals (clinical practice, environment and institutions) which concerns SED members; encouranging an ethical reflection. Methodology: Qualitative study, based on a semi-structured, open interview, sent to members of the SED (n░=░1035), through electronic access, on 4 bioethical aspects: the problems detected in clinical practice, the problems of the work environment, the problems in the work organizations, and possible suggestions. These are grouped as they refer to the indications (beneficence and non-maleficence), justice (understood as equity), autonomy (information and preferences). Results: A total of 6░% professionals participated in the interview (n░=░62/1035). A panel was prepared with the 10 main issues identified (Top10). They emphasize the uncertainty in the taking of decisions in the therapeutic, the limitation of the therapeutic effort, the conditioning of the sanitary system, the relations with the pharmaceutical industry and the search of the excellence. Conclusions: This qualitative study allows identifying ethical problems that interest professionals dedicated to pain. It is convenient to confirm and size them through quantitative studies.
疼痛管理中的伦理问题。通过开放式反思访谈进行定性研究。
导言:在疼痛领域的医疗实践将伦理问题与疾病患者的护理联系起来,导致功能恶化,对他们的劳动重返社会的预后不确定,以及家庭和社会资源的巨大消耗。在西班牙疼痛学会(SED)内成立了一个生物伦理工作组后,试图分析这些问题。目的:了解与SED成员有关的专业人员(临床实践、环境和机构)的道德问题;鼓励道德反思。方法:质性研究,基于半结构化的公开访谈,通过电子访问发送给SED (n × 1035)成员,内容涉及4个生物伦理方面:临床实践中发现的问题、工作环境的问题、工作组织的问题和可能的建议。这些是分组,因为它们涉及的迹象(善意和无害),正义(理解为公平),自治(信息和偏好)。结果:共有6 %的专业人员参与了访谈(n × 62/1035)。准备了一个小组,确定了10个主要问题(Top10)。他们强调了治疗决策的不确定性、治疗努力的局限性、卫生系统的制约、与制药工业的关系以及对卓越的追求。结论:这一定性研究允许识别感兴趣的专业人士致力于疼痛的伦理问题。通过定量研究,便于对其进行确认和定量化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista de la Sociedad Espanola del Dolor
Revista de la Sociedad Espanola del Dolor Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: BOLETÍN INFORMATIVO de la Sociedad Española del Dolor. Sociedad Española del Dolor, Suscriptores, Hospitales, Bibliotecas y Facultades de Medicina.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信