Overcoming Deliberate Indifference: Reconsidering Effective Legal Protections for Bullied Special Education Students

IF 1 4区 社会学 Q2 LAW
Paul M. Secunda
{"title":"Overcoming Deliberate Indifference: Reconsidering Effective Legal Protections for Bullied Special Education Students","authors":"Paul M. Secunda","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2402005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ten years ago, in response to an epidemic of bullying and harassment of special education students in our nation’s schools, I put forward two new legal proposals based on legal protections that these students uniquely have under the Individual with Disabilities in Education (IDEA). Although these proposals have gained some traction in the ensuing time period, most courts continue to analyze these cases under the same series of largely ineffectual constitutional and statutory laws. What many of these laws have in common with my previous proposals is reliance on a deliberate indifference standard, which requires schools and responsible school officials to essentially ignore the bullying behavior before being held legally accountable for their actions. Not surprisingly, there has been a remarkable lack of case success in even the most severe instances of special education student bullying.To provide meaningful legal protections for bullied special education children, this article seeks to overcome the deliberate indifference standard by relying on a combination of reasonable accommodation principles under federal disability law and legal protections that children with disabilities already have under IDEA. More specifically, this article argues for adoption of the gross mismanagement standard under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act and an expansion of existing state anti-bullying laws to provide special education children with various forms of private rights of action to combat the most severe forms of bullying. These new legal proposals will add to the arsenal that bullied special education children have at their disposal to fight back against both their tormentors and their institutional and individual enablers.","PeriodicalId":47018,"journal":{"name":"University of Illinois Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Illinois Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2402005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Ten years ago, in response to an epidemic of bullying and harassment of special education students in our nation’s schools, I put forward two new legal proposals based on legal protections that these students uniquely have under the Individual with Disabilities in Education (IDEA). Although these proposals have gained some traction in the ensuing time period, most courts continue to analyze these cases under the same series of largely ineffectual constitutional and statutory laws. What many of these laws have in common with my previous proposals is reliance on a deliberate indifference standard, which requires schools and responsible school officials to essentially ignore the bullying behavior before being held legally accountable for their actions. Not surprisingly, there has been a remarkable lack of case success in even the most severe instances of special education student bullying.To provide meaningful legal protections for bullied special education children, this article seeks to overcome the deliberate indifference standard by relying on a combination of reasonable accommodation principles under federal disability law and legal protections that children with disabilities already have under IDEA. More specifically, this article argues for adoption of the gross mismanagement standard under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act and an expansion of existing state anti-bullying laws to provide special education children with various forms of private rights of action to combat the most severe forms of bullying. These new legal proposals will add to the arsenal that bullied special education children have at their disposal to fight back against both their tormentors and their institutional and individual enablers.
克服故意冷漠:对受欺凌特殊教育学生有效法律保护的再思考
十年前,为了应对我国学校中普遍存在的对特殊教育学生的欺凌和骚扰,我提出了两项新的法律建议,这些建议是基于《教育中的残疾学生法案》(Individual with Disabilities in education,简称IDEA)对这些学生的独特法律保护。虽然这些建议在随后的一段时间内获得了一些牵引力,但大多数法院继续在同样一系列基本上无效的宪法和成文法下分析这些案件。这些法律与我之前的建议有一个共同点,那就是依赖于故意的冷漠标准,这要求学校和负责任的学校官员在对他们的行为承担法律责任之前,基本上忽略欺凌行为。毫不奇怪,即使是在最严重的特殊教育学生欺凌事件中,也很少有成功的案例。为了为受欺凌的特殊教育儿童提供有意义的法律保护,本文试图通过结合联邦残疾法中的合理便利原则和残疾儿童在IDEA下已经获得的法律保护来克服故意冷漠标准。更具体地说,本文主张采用《康复法案》第504条规定的严重管理不善标准,并扩大现有的州反欺凌法,为特殊教育儿童提供各种形式的私人行动权,以打击最严重的欺凌形式。这些新的法律提案将增加受欺负的特殊教育儿童的武器库,让他们可以随时反击折磨他们的人,以及他们的机构和个人支持者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信