Interpreting the Thirteenth Amendment

A. Tsesis
{"title":"Interpreting the Thirteenth Amendment","authors":"A. Tsesis","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1448852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article develops a pragmatic proposal for passing federal civil rights statutes pursuant to the Thirteenth Amendment. It begins with an analysis of Supreme Court precedents and turns to the amendment's contemporary applications. I am particularly concerned here with developing a legislative approach that will cautiously build on Supreme Court jurisprudence to identify the scope of congressional enforcement authority.The Thirteenth Amendment provides the federal government with the power to enact legislation that criminalizes certain private acts of discrimination. Congress may pass necessary and proper laws that can reasonably be expected to end subordinating infringements against individual rights. In significant circumstances, several of which are discussed here, the Thirteenth Amendment covers anti-social behavior that is beyond the scope of the Fourteenth Amendment and Commerce Clause, even though these two are more commonly relied on for civil rights enforcement. Given the sparseness of Thirteenth Amendment precedents, broadening its reach is more likely to succeed through incremental policymaking. This step-by-step strategy is analogous to the NAACP’s successful approach to litigation in the Fourteenth Amendment area. If this initial, pragmatic effort succeeds in the courts, Congress can later be more expansive in passing laws against discrimination targeting a range of identifiable groups.","PeriodicalId":90761,"journal":{"name":"University of Pennsylvania journal of constitutional law","volume":"11 1","pages":"1337"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Pennsylvania journal of constitutional law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1448852","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This article develops a pragmatic proposal for passing federal civil rights statutes pursuant to the Thirteenth Amendment. It begins with an analysis of Supreme Court precedents and turns to the amendment's contemporary applications. I am particularly concerned here with developing a legislative approach that will cautiously build on Supreme Court jurisprudence to identify the scope of congressional enforcement authority.The Thirteenth Amendment provides the federal government with the power to enact legislation that criminalizes certain private acts of discrimination. Congress may pass necessary and proper laws that can reasonably be expected to end subordinating infringements against individual rights. In significant circumstances, several of which are discussed here, the Thirteenth Amendment covers anti-social behavior that is beyond the scope of the Fourteenth Amendment and Commerce Clause, even though these two are more commonly relied on for civil rights enforcement. Given the sparseness of Thirteenth Amendment precedents, broadening its reach is more likely to succeed through incremental policymaking. This step-by-step strategy is analogous to the NAACP’s successful approach to litigation in the Fourteenth Amendment area. If this initial, pragmatic effort succeeds in the courts, Congress can later be more expansive in passing laws against discrimination targeting a range of identifiable groups.
解读第十三修正案
本文提出了一项根据宪法第十三修正案通过联邦民权法规的实用建议。文章首先分析了最高法院的判例,然后转向该修正案在当代的应用。在这里,我特别关心的是制定一种立法方法,谨慎地以最高法院的判例为基础,确定国会执法权力的范围。第十三修正案赋予联邦政府立法的权力,将某些私人歧视行为定为刑事犯罪。国会可以通过必要和适当的法律,可以合理地期望结束对个人权利的从属侵犯。在一些重要的情况下,第十三修正案涵盖的反社会行为超出了第十四修正案和商业条款的范围,尽管这两个条款更常被用于民权的执行。鉴于第十三条修正案的先例较少,扩大其影响范围更有可能通过渐进的政策制定取得成功。这种循序渐进的策略类似于全国有色人种协进会在第十四修正案领域成功的诉讼方法。如果这一最初的务实努力在法庭上取得成功,国会以后就可以更广泛地通过法律,反对针对一系列可识别群体的歧视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信