Take Off the [Color] Blinders: How Ignoring the Hague Convention’s Subsidiarity Principle Furthers Structural Racism Against Black American Children

D. Gossett
{"title":"Take Off the [Color] Blinders: How Ignoring the Hague Convention’s Subsidiarity Principle Furthers Structural Racism Against Black American Children","authors":"D. Gossett","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2400603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Hague Convention on Intercountry Adoption, to which the United States subscribes, was established to stem the tide of corruption in international adoption. It sets adoption practice standards for member countries and, through its subsidiarity principle, provides for international adoption as a child’s best interest only when intra-country adoption is not available. However, the United States currently allows its citizens to adopt from countries that refuse to adhere to the Hague Convention, creating a two-system approach to international adoption, and intra-country adoption avenues are not being exhausted prior to U.S. international adoptions. The United States is currently the largest “receiving country” in international adoption, but even as the globalization of the adoption industry has led to a more culturally diverse American population, the United States is certainly not colorblind in its approach to adoption. Despite adherence to post-racial thought, the children aging out of foster care unadopted are disproportionately black, and race still negatively influences industry standards. What is more, the United States has become known as a “sending country,” as it ships many of its black and biracial foster care children abroad to find homes, leading some to call the practice of international adoption “covert racism.” This Article suggests, just as Derrick Bell’s Interest Convergence Theory argued that colorblindness was co-opted through Brown v. Board of Education to serve the interests of white elites, that the best interests of the child standard has been co-opted in adoption merely to satisfy predominantly white demands for children. The Children in Families First Act has even been introduced to circumvent the Hague’s subsidiarity principle and to provide more children for international adoption. However, the Article concludes that the United States should not allow international adoptions – whether to or from the United States – until all domestic placement efforts have been exhausted, in line with the Hague’s subsidiarity principle. The Article ultimately calls for abolishment of the current U.S. two-system approach to international adoption that circumvents Hague protocols and protections and contributes to the structural racism against black American children.","PeriodicalId":82640,"journal":{"name":"Santa Clara law review","volume":"55 1","pages":"261"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Santa Clara law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2400603","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Hague Convention on Intercountry Adoption, to which the United States subscribes, was established to stem the tide of corruption in international adoption. It sets adoption practice standards for member countries and, through its subsidiarity principle, provides for international adoption as a child’s best interest only when intra-country adoption is not available. However, the United States currently allows its citizens to adopt from countries that refuse to adhere to the Hague Convention, creating a two-system approach to international adoption, and intra-country adoption avenues are not being exhausted prior to U.S. international adoptions. The United States is currently the largest “receiving country” in international adoption, but even as the globalization of the adoption industry has led to a more culturally diverse American population, the United States is certainly not colorblind in its approach to adoption. Despite adherence to post-racial thought, the children aging out of foster care unadopted are disproportionately black, and race still negatively influences industry standards. What is more, the United States has become known as a “sending country,” as it ships many of its black and biracial foster care children abroad to find homes, leading some to call the practice of international adoption “covert racism.” This Article suggests, just as Derrick Bell’s Interest Convergence Theory argued that colorblindness was co-opted through Brown v. Board of Education to serve the interests of white elites, that the best interests of the child standard has been co-opted in adoption merely to satisfy predominantly white demands for children. The Children in Families First Act has even been introduced to circumvent the Hague’s subsidiarity principle and to provide more children for international adoption. However, the Article concludes that the United States should not allow international adoptions – whether to or from the United States – until all domestic placement efforts have been exhausted, in line with the Hague’s subsidiarity principle. The Article ultimately calls for abolishment of the current U.S. two-system approach to international adoption that circumvents Hague protocols and protections and contributes to the structural racism against black American children.
摘掉[颜色]眼罩:忽视海牙公约的辅助原则如何进一步加剧对美国黑人儿童的结构性种族主义
美国签署的《关于跨国收养的海牙公约》是为了制止国际收养中的腐败现象而制定的。它为成员国制定了收养做法标准,并通过其辅助原则规定,只有在无法进行国内收养时,才将国际收养作为儿童的最佳利益。然而,美国目前允许其公民从拒绝遵守《海牙公约》的国家收养儿童,从而形成了一种国际收养的双系统方法,而且在美国的国际收养之前,国内收养途径并没有用尽。美国目前是国际收养中最大的“接收国”,但即使收养行业的全球化导致美国人口的文化更加多样化,美国在收养方法上当然不是色盲的。尽管人们坚持后种族主义思想,但从寄养中心离开而未被收养的儿童中,黑人比例不成比例,种族仍然对行业标准产生负面影响。更重要的是,美国已经成为一个众所周知的“派遣国”,因为它把许多黑人和混血儿寄养儿童送到国外寻找家庭,导致一些人把国际收养的做法称为“隐蔽的种族主义”。这篇文章表明,正如德里克·贝尔(Derrick Bell)的利益趋同理论(Interest Convergence Theory)认为,通过布朗诉教育委员会案(Brown v. Board of Education),色盲被强化为服务于白人精英的利益,儿童的最大利益标准在收养中被强化为仅仅是为了满足以白人为主的儿童需求。《家庭中的儿童第一法案》的出台甚至是为了规避海牙的辅助原则,为国际收养提供更多的儿童。然而,该条的结论是,根据海牙的辅助原则,在所有国内安置努力都已用尽之前,美国不应允许国际收养- -无论是到美国还是从美国收养。该条款最终呼吁废除目前美国在国际收养问题上的双重体制做法,这种做法绕过了海牙议定书和保护措施,助长了针对美国黑人儿童的结构性种族主义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书