Exploring Environmental Disclosure in SelectedAustralian Multinationals under the GRI Guidelines

O. Farooque, B. Kotey, Helena Ahulu
{"title":"Exploring Environmental Disclosure in SelectedAustralian Multinationals under the GRI Guidelines","authors":"O. Farooque, B. Kotey, Helena Ahulu","doi":"10.22164/ISEA.V8I3.90","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores changes in environmental reporting among Australian MNEs between 2004 and 2007, using the GRI guidelines, and explains how GRI transformation (from G2 to G3) leads to changes in environmental disclosure aspects along with their association with company size, profitability, industry sector. Applying Wilcoxon matched pair signed ranked and Spearman rank correlation tests, twenty companies from the Australian SAM Sustainability Index (AuSSI) are examined to identify the extent of changes on specific aspects of environmental disclosure. The findings of the paper document a significant increase in environmental reporting in Australian companies. In particular, reporting has increased for energy, emissions and environmental management followed by water, overall, materials, transport and product/services aspects. However, a shift in emphasis from compliance and biodiversity aspects associated with climate changes and resource preservation is also evident. Again, the majority of changes occurred in companies operating in environmentally sensitive industries with industry sector having significant relationship with a few environmental disclosure aspects, the study shows no significant effect of company size and profitability on different environmental disclosure aspects. These evidences indicate that external forces (such as, legislation, industry sensitiveness to environment, and stakeholder awareness and pressure) rather than internal factors are more effective to influence and determine environmental disclosure in Australian companies.","PeriodicalId":31316,"journal":{"name":"Issues in Social and Environmental Accounting","volume":"8 1","pages":"137-155"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Issues in Social and Environmental Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22164/ISEA.V8I3.90","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper explores changes in environmental reporting among Australian MNEs between 2004 and 2007, using the GRI guidelines, and explains how GRI transformation (from G2 to G3) leads to changes in environmental disclosure aspects along with their association with company size, profitability, industry sector. Applying Wilcoxon matched pair signed ranked and Spearman rank correlation tests, twenty companies from the Australian SAM Sustainability Index (AuSSI) are examined to identify the extent of changes on specific aspects of environmental disclosure. The findings of the paper document a significant increase in environmental reporting in Australian companies. In particular, reporting has increased for energy, emissions and environmental management followed by water, overall, materials, transport and product/services aspects. However, a shift in emphasis from compliance and biodiversity aspects associated with climate changes and resource preservation is also evident. Again, the majority of changes occurred in companies operating in environmentally sensitive industries with industry sector having significant relationship with a few environmental disclosure aspects, the study shows no significant effect of company size and profitability on different environmental disclosure aspects. These evidences indicate that external forces (such as, legislation, industry sensitiveness to environment, and stakeholder awareness and pressure) rather than internal factors are more effective to influence and determine environmental disclosure in Australian companies.
在GRI指引下探讨选定的澳大利亚跨国公司的环境信息披露
本文利用GRI指南探讨了2004年至2007年间澳大利亚跨国公司环境报告的变化,并解释了GRI转型(从G2到G3)如何导致环境披露方面的变化,以及它们与公司规模、盈利能力、行业部门的关系。应用Wilcoxon配对对签名排名和Spearman秩相关检验,从澳大利亚SAM可持续发展指数(AuSSI)的20家公司进行检查,以确定在环境披露的具体方面的变化程度。该论文的研究结果表明,澳大利亚公司的环境报告显著增加。特别是增加了能源、排放和环境管理方面的报告,其次是水、总体、材料、运输和产品/服务方面的报告。然而,重点也明显从与气候变化和资源保护有关的遵约和生物多样性方面转移。同样,大多数变化发生在环境敏感行业的公司,行业部门与一些环境信息披露方面存在显著关系,研究表明公司规模和盈利能力对不同环境信息披露方面没有显著影响。这些证据表明,外部力量(如立法、行业对环境的敏感性、利益相关者的意识和压力)比内部因素更有效地影响和决定澳大利亚公司的环境披露。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信