S. Schaltegger, C. Herzig
{"title":"Managing Supplier Requirements with HSE Accounting: The case of the Mechanical Engineering Company Bisma Jaya, Indonesia","authors":"S. Schaltegger, C. Herzig","doi":"10.22164/ISEA.V5I2.60","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As recent disasters in the offshore petroleum and other industries illustrate, managing HSE isparticularly relevant for companies operating in high risk industrial sectors. HSE managementsystems support companies in minimising adverse health effects, injuries and environmentaldamages as well as in complying with legislation, standards and stakeholder expectations. Keyelements are risk assessment and control through implementation of preventive and protectivemeasures, the preparation of emergency situations and investigation of accidents. HSE managementsystems have also become a common element of supply chain audits and management. Toincrease transparency in their supply chains and to reduce risks, large companies aim at aligningcompliance of suppliers with their health, safety and environment (HSE) goals and policy.This paper shows with the case of Bisma Jaya, an Indonesian mechanical engineering company,how accounting for HSE can support small and medium sized suppliers to meet the requirementsof large international customers. This paper proposes a framework for HSE managementaccounting and examines the use of management accounting to improve the HSE performanceof an Indonesian company as a response to customer audit requirements. The companyis a supplier of a large oil company and seeks for effective and efficient ways of HSE improvement.The paper unfolds benefits and limitations of narrow efficiency-oriented responsesto rating systems and audits and highlights that efficiency considerations in HSE managementare only partially useful and require complementing effectiveness considerations on HSE performance. Copyright © www.iiste.org","PeriodicalId":31316,"journal":{"name":"Issues in Social and Environmental Accounting","volume":"5 1","pages":"82-105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Issues in Social and Environmental Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22164/ISEA.V5I2.60","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
用HSE会计管理供应商需求:以印尼Bisma Jaya机械工程公司为例
正如最近发生在海上石油和其他行业的灾难所表明的那样,管理HSE对于在高风险行业运营的公司尤为重要。HSE管理体系支持公司最大限度地减少对健康的不利影响、伤害和环境损害,并遵守法律、标准和利益相关者的期望。关键要素是通过实施预防和保护措施来评估和控制风险、准备应对紧急情况和调查事故。HSE管理体系也已成为供应链审计和管理的共同要素。为了提高供应链的透明度并降低风险,大公司的目标是使供应商符合其健康、安全和环境(HSE)目标和政策。本文以印尼机械工程公司Bisma Jaya为例,展示了HSE会计如何支持中小型供应商满足大型国际客户的要求。本文提出了一个HSE管理会计框架,并研究了管理会计的使用,以提高印尼公司的HSE绩效,以响应客户的审计要求。该公司是一家大型石油公司的供应商,寻求有效和高效的HSE改进方法。本文揭示了对评级系统和审计的狭隘的以效率为导向的回应的好处和局限性,并强调了HSE管理中的效率考虑只是部分有用的,需要补充对HSE绩效的有效性考虑。Â版权所有©www.iiste.org
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。