Azham Md. Ali, H. Yusof
{"title":"Quality in Qualitative Studies: The Case of Validity, Reliability and Generalizability","authors":"Azham Md. Ali, H. Yusof","doi":"10.22164/ISEA.V5I1.59","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concern over the subject of quality judgement of qualitative research has led to the emergenceof several varied positions. Whichever labels used in describing the positions, each has adistinctive character. To attempt to an understanding of the meaning of the quality criteria ofvalidity, reliability and generalizability in qualitative research, this paper provides a review ofrelevant literature of recent years. To check on the extent of their reporting in research papers, atotal of 15 accounting research recently published in top-ranked accounting journals have beenselected. Except for one paper, the rest has failed to provide detailed discussion on the validity,reliability and generalizability of their research. But this would not necessarily mean that theconcerned researchers have disregarded the aspects of validity, reliability and generalizabilityduring the conduct of their research. Perhaps the only way to find out the truth is by asking theresearchers themselves the relevant questions. Copyright © www.iiste.org","PeriodicalId":31316,"journal":{"name":"Issues in Social and Environmental Accounting","volume":"5 1","pages":"25-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"195","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Issues in Social and Environmental Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22164/ISEA.V5I1.59","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 195
质性研究的品质:效度、信度与普遍性的案例
对质性研究质量判断问题的关注导致了几种不同立场的出现。无论用哪一种标签来描述这些位置,每一种都有其独特的特征。为了理解效度、信度和概括性等质量标准在定性研究中的意义,本文对近年来的相关文献进行了综述。为了检查他们在研究论文中的报告程度,我们选择了最近在顶级会计期刊上发表的15项会计研究。除了一篇论文外,其余的都没有对其研究的效度、信度和概括性进行详细的讨论。但这并不一定意味着相关研究人员在研究过程中忽视了有效性、可靠性和概括性。也许找出真相的唯一方法就是向研究人员自己提出相关的问题。Â版权所有©www.iiste.org
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。