{"title":"De chronologie van Ruusbroecs werken volgens de Groenendaalse codex","authors":"H. Kienhorst, M. Kors","doi":"10.2143/OGE.75.1.565521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is the fourth in a series dedicated to the major manuscripts of Ruusbroec's works. The present publication was preceded by: 'Corpusvorming van Ruusbroecs werken', in: Ons Geestelijk Erf 72 (1998), pp. 3-53; 'Fragment van een onbekend Ruusbroec-verzamelhandschrift', in: Ons Geestelijk Erf 72 (1998), pp. 164-172; 'Een studiereis naar Groenendaal. De Nacomelinc en de totstandkoming van Ruusbroechandschrift D', in: Ons Geestelijk Erf 72 (1998), pp. 221-245. This contribution deals with the table of contents, the pro- and epilogues, the head-ings, and the running titles in the manuscript usually referred to as 'A'. MS A is the surviving part of the once bipartite Groenendaal codex, which contained all of Ruusbroec's works, except for his letters, and was written ca. 1365. Of particular interest is the table of contents in MS A, which not only provides information concerning the treatises, but also determines the periods in which Ruusbroec 'published' them. As we will show, MS F transmits a copy of the table of contents in accordance with the lost part of the Groenendaal codex. Thus it is possible to make a reconstruction of the original table, that enables us to distinguish three periods in Ruusboec's life to which the publication of his works can be related, i.e.: [1] as a secular priest in Brussels (1317-43), [2] as a hennit in the woods near this town (1343-50), and, finally, [3] as the prior of the Groenendaal monastery (1350-81). The reconstruction, however, poses a major problem for the chronology of Ruusbroec's works. According to the reconstructed table of contents of the Groenendaal codex, Die geestelijke brulocht saw the light when Ruusbroec was the prior of the Groenendaal monastery, whereas the communis opinio among Ruusbroec experts to date has been that it belongs to the Brussels' period. There is, however, much more evidence dating from the fourteenth century, which shows that the Brulocht has to be postdated. Most likely, it was written in","PeriodicalId":39580,"journal":{"name":"Ons Geestelijk Erf","volume":"75 1","pages":"69-101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ons Geestelijk Erf","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2143/OGE.75.1.565521","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article is the fourth in a series dedicated to the major manuscripts of Ruusbroec's works. The present publication was preceded by: 'Corpusvorming van Ruusbroecs werken', in: Ons Geestelijk Erf 72 (1998), pp. 3-53; 'Fragment van een onbekend Ruusbroec-verzamelhandschrift', in: Ons Geestelijk Erf 72 (1998), pp. 164-172; 'Een studiereis naar Groenendaal. De Nacomelinc en de totstandkoming van Ruusbroechandschrift D', in: Ons Geestelijk Erf 72 (1998), pp. 221-245. This contribution deals with the table of contents, the pro- and epilogues, the head-ings, and the running titles in the manuscript usually referred to as 'A'. MS A is the surviving part of the once bipartite Groenendaal codex, which contained all of Ruusbroec's works, except for his letters, and was written ca. 1365. Of particular interest is the table of contents in MS A, which not only provides information concerning the treatises, but also determines the periods in which Ruusbroec 'published' them. As we will show, MS F transmits a copy of the table of contents in accordance with the lost part of the Groenendaal codex. Thus it is possible to make a reconstruction of the original table, that enables us to distinguish three periods in Ruusboec's life to which the publication of his works can be related, i.e.: [1] as a secular priest in Brussels (1317-43), [2] as a hennit in the woods near this town (1343-50), and, finally, [3] as the prior of the Groenendaal monastery (1350-81). The reconstruction, however, poses a major problem for the chronology of Ruusbroec's works. According to the reconstructed table of contents of the Groenendaal codex, Die geestelijke brulocht saw the light when Ruusbroec was the prior of the Groenendaal monastery, whereas the communis opinio among Ruusbroec experts to date has been that it belongs to the Brussels' period. There is, however, much more evidence dating from the fourteenth century, which shows that the Brulocht has to be postdated. Most likely, it was written in
这篇文章是鲁斯布鲁克作品主要手稿系列的第四篇。本出版物之前是:“Corpusvorming van Ruusbroecs werken”,见:Ons Geestelijk Erf 72(1998),第3-53页;< Fragment van een onbekend Ruusbroec-verzamelhandschrift >,载于:Ons Geestelijk Erf 72(1998),第164-172页;“甚至连研究都是格林纳达尔。《科学与发展》,载《科学与发展》第72期(1998),页221-245。这一贡献涉及目录,前和后记,标题,和运行标题在手稿中通常被称为“A”。MS A是曾经分为两部分的格林纳达尔手抄本的幸存部分,它包含了鲁斯布鲁克的所有作品,除了他的信件,大约写于1365年。特别令人感兴趣的是MS A的目录,它不仅提供了有关论文的信息,而且还确定了Ruusbroec“发表”它们的时期。正如我们将展示的那样,MS F传送了一份目录的副本,该目录与格林纳达尔抄本丢失的部分是一致的。因此,有可能对原始表格进行重建,这使我们能够区分Ruusboec一生中与他的作品出版有关的三个时期,即:[1]作为布鲁塞尔的世俗牧师(1317-43),[1]作为该镇附近树林中的hennit(1343-50),[3]作为Groenendaal修道院的院长(1350-81)。重建,然而,提出了一个主要问题,为鲁斯布鲁克的作品年表。根据重建目录Groenendaal抄本,死geestelijke brulocht看到光吕斯布鲁克Groenendaal修道院的之前的时候,而普通的意见吕斯布鲁克专家们迄今为止,它属于布鲁塞尔的时期。然而,有更多的证据可以追溯到14世纪,这表明布鲁洛赫特必须推迟日期。很可能是写在里面的
期刊介绍:
Ons Geestelijk Erf is een driemaandelijks tijdschrift gewijd aan de geschiedenis van de spiritualiteit in de Nederlanden. Het bestrijkt de periode vanaf de kerstening van de Nederlanden tot het einde van het Ancien Régime. Het tijdschrift werd in 1927 gesticht door D.A. Stracke s.j. († 1970) en het wordt sindsdien door het Ruusbroecgenootschap, dat in 1973 werd opgenomen in de Universitaire Faculteiten Sint-Ignatius te Antwerpen. Sinds 2003 maakt het Ruusbroecgenootschap deel uit van Universiteit Antwerpen als Instituut voor de geschiedenis van de spiritualiteit in de Nederlanden tot ca. 1750.