De derde orde als onderdeel van de moderne devotie

Q4 Arts and Humanities
K. Goudriaan
{"title":"De derde orde als onderdeel van de moderne devotie","authors":"K. Goudriaan","doi":"10.2143/OGE.74.1.616443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Only recently, the convents of the Third Order of St Francis united in the Chapter of Utrecht (and in the related Chapters of Zepperen and Cologne) have been fully recognised as an integral part of the movement known as the Modern Devotion. In this contribution, the Third Order is addressed from an historiographical point of view. Chronicles and other texts originating in the different branches of the Modern Devotion and dating from the period until ca. 1475 are investigated as to their comments on the Tertiaries. In fact, they seldom mention the Third Order directly, but they do take notice of the merits of those devotionalists who were prominent in the Chapter of Utrecht and who were leading the way towards adopting St Francis' Third Rule. The only person who pays attention to the Third Order more than occasionally, is Johannes Busch, author of the Chronicon Windeshemense, a composite work on the origin of both the monastery and the chapter of Windesheim. Even in his perception, however, it is not the adoption of the Third Rule and the belonging to one order or another that is decisive for a convent to be fully recognised as a member of the movement, but the connection that exists or can be construed between this convent and the brotherhood in Deventer, which was under the direction of Geert Grote's disciple Florens Radewijnsz. In the internal debate between the devotionalists, no special emphasis is placed on the preeminence of the way of life of the Brothers and Sisters of the Common Life, who in their abstention from any rule copied the way of life of the ecclesia primitiva. Busch, moreover, tends to see the status of the Tertiaries as akin to the one of the Brothers and Sisters rather than as a preliminary phase leading towards the full religious life of the Augustinian Canons and Canonesses (as united in the Chapter of Windesheim).","PeriodicalId":39580,"journal":{"name":"Ons Geestelijk Erf","volume":"74 1","pages":"9-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ons Geestelijk Erf","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2143/OGE.74.1.616443","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Only recently, the convents of the Third Order of St Francis united in the Chapter of Utrecht (and in the related Chapters of Zepperen and Cologne) have been fully recognised as an integral part of the movement known as the Modern Devotion. In this contribution, the Third Order is addressed from an historiographical point of view. Chronicles and other texts originating in the different branches of the Modern Devotion and dating from the period until ca. 1475 are investigated as to their comments on the Tertiaries. In fact, they seldom mention the Third Order directly, but they do take notice of the merits of those devotionalists who were prominent in the Chapter of Utrecht and who were leading the way towards adopting St Francis' Third Rule. The only person who pays attention to the Third Order more than occasionally, is Johannes Busch, author of the Chronicon Windeshemense, a composite work on the origin of both the monastery and the chapter of Windesheim. Even in his perception, however, it is not the adoption of the Third Rule and the belonging to one order or another that is decisive for a convent to be fully recognised as a member of the movement, but the connection that exists or can be construed between this convent and the brotherhood in Deventer, which was under the direction of Geert Grote's disciple Florens Radewijnsz. In the internal debate between the devotionalists, no special emphasis is placed on the preeminence of the way of life of the Brothers and Sisters of the Common Life, who in their abstention from any rule copied the way of life of the ecclesia primitiva. Busch, moreover, tends to see the status of the Tertiaries as akin to the one of the Brothers and Sisters rather than as a preliminary phase leading towards the full religious life of the Augustinian Canons and Canonesses (as united in the Chapter of Windesheim).
第三等级是现代奉献的一部分
直到最近,在乌得勒支章节(以及齐佩伦和科隆的相关章节)的第三秩序圣方济各修道院已经完全被认为是被称为现代奉献运动的一个组成部分。在这个贡献中,第三秩序是从史学的角度来解决的。编年史和其他文本起源于不同分支的现代奉献和日期的时期,直到大约1475被调查为他们的评论第三。事实上,他们很少直接提到第三秩序,但他们确实注意到那些在乌得勒支分会中突出的虔诚主义者的优点,他们引领了采用圣弗朗西斯第三规则的道路。唯一一个不只是偶尔关注第三秩序的人是约翰内斯·布希,他是《温德斯海姆年表》的作者,这是一本关于修道院和温德斯海姆章节起源的综合著作。然而,即使在他看来,决定一个修道院是否被完全承认为运动成员的,也不是第三条规则的采用和属于一个或另一个修会,而是这个修道院与Deventer的兄弟会之间存在或可以解释的联系,该兄弟会是在Geert Grote的门徒Florens Radewijnsz的指导下进行的。在奉献者之间的内部辩论中,没有特别强调共同生活的兄弟姐妹的生活方式的优越性,他们不遵守任何规则,复制了原始教会的生活方式。此外,Busch倾向于认为,三级的地位类似于一个兄弟姐妹,而不是作为一个初步阶段,导致奥古斯丁佳能和女圣徒的完整的宗教生活(如团结在Windesheim章)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ons Geestelijk Erf
Ons Geestelijk Erf Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Ons Geestelijk Erf is een driemaandelijks tijdschrift gewijd aan de geschiedenis van de spiritualiteit in de Nederlanden. Het bestrijkt de periode vanaf de kerstening van de Nederlanden tot het einde van het Ancien Régime. Het tijdschrift werd in 1927 gesticht door D.A. Stracke s.j. († 1970) en het wordt sindsdien door het Ruusbroecgenootschap, dat in 1973 werd opgenomen in de Universitaire Faculteiten Sint-Ignatius te Antwerpen. Sinds 2003 maakt het Ruusbroecgenootschap deel uit van Universiteit Antwerpen als Instituut voor de geschiedenis van de spiritualiteit in de Nederlanden tot ca. 1750.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信