Corporate Social Performance, Financial Performance for Firms that Restate Earnings

Lois S. Mahoney, Willaim D. LaGore, Joseph A. Scazzero
{"title":"Corporate Social Performance, Financial Performance for Firms that Restate Earnings","authors":"Lois S. Mahoney, Willaim D. LaGore, Joseph A. Scazzero","doi":"10.22164/ISEA.V2I1.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines corporate social performance (CSP) in firms that restate their financialstatements and, using a match pair design, compares their performance to firms that do notrestate their financial statements. Utilizing a randomized block design (two years prior to therestatement and two years after the restatement) for a sample of 44 U.S. firms, we found thatCSP Strengths, CSP Weaknesses, CSP People Strengths, and CSP People Weaknesses all increasedafter restatement though weaknesses increased at a greater rate than strengths. Additionally,using panel data and a match pair design we found, we found that restating firms hada greater increase in CSP Strengths, CSP Weaknesses, CSP Product Strengths, CSP PeopleStrengths and a greater decrease in Total CSP People than non-restating firms after the restatementperiod. When comparing the relationships between CSP and financial performance (FP),we found that the positive relationship between ROA and CSP Strengths is greater for restatementfirms than non-restating firms. In particular, we find that this positive relationship is aresult of the People dimension of CSP, in particular CSP People Strengths. Copyright © www.iiste.org","PeriodicalId":31316,"journal":{"name":"Issues in Social and Environmental Accounting","volume":"2 1","pages":"104-130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Issues in Social and Environmental Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22164/ISEA.V2I1.27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

This study examines corporate social performance (CSP) in firms that restate their financialstatements and, using a match pair design, compares their performance to firms that do notrestate their financial statements. Utilizing a randomized block design (two years prior to therestatement and two years after the restatement) for a sample of 44 U.S. firms, we found thatCSP Strengths, CSP Weaknesses, CSP People Strengths, and CSP People Weaknesses all increasedafter restatement though weaknesses increased at a greater rate than strengths. Additionally,using panel data and a match pair design we found, we found that restating firms hada greater increase in CSP Strengths, CSP Weaknesses, CSP Product Strengths, CSP PeopleStrengths and a greater decrease in Total CSP People than non-restating firms after the restatementperiod. When comparing the relationships between CSP and financial performance (FP),we found that the positive relationship between ROA and CSP Strengths is greater for restatementfirms than non-restating firms. In particular, we find that this positive relationship is aresult of the People dimension of CSP, in particular CSP People Strengths. Copyright © www.iiste.org
企业社会绩效,重报盈余公司的财务绩效
本研究考察了重述财务报表的公司的企业社会绩效(CSP),并使用配对设计,将其绩效与未重述财务报表的公司进行比较。利用随机区组设计(陈述前两年和重述后两年)对44家美国公司的样本,我们发现CSP优势、CSP劣势、CSP人员优势和CSP人员劣势在重述后都有所增加,尽管劣势的增长速度大于优势。此外,使用面板数据和配对设计,我们发现,在重述期后,与非重述公司相比,重述公司在CSP优势、CSP劣势、CSP产品优势、CSP人员优势方面有更大的增加,而CSP总人数则有更大的减少。当比较CSP与财务绩效(FP)之间的关系时,我们发现重述企业的ROA与CSP优势之间的正相关关系大于非重述企业。特别是,我们发现这种正相关关系是CSP的人的维度,特别是CSP的人的优势的结果。Â版权所有©www.iiste.org
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信