From Swamp Drainage to Wetlands Regulation to Ecological Nuisances to Environmental Ethics

J. Nagle
{"title":"From Swamp Drainage to Wetlands Regulation to Ecological Nuisances to Environmental Ethics","authors":"J. Nagle","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1346983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay shows how ecological nuisances should be accepted under longstanding principles of nuisance law. Ecological nuisances build upon the flexible history of nuisance law's response to changed attitudes toward interferences with land use. I use the example of wetlands to illustrate ecological nuisances. Wetlands are an especially appropriate example because they are featured in many recent environmental disputes, and because the societal understanding of wetlands has changed so dramatically during the past century. On the other hand, a theory of ecological nuisances is not limited to wetlands. Ecosystems of all types provide services, and the interference with those services could constitute a nuisance. I begin by describing the swamps that were the bane of societal-including judicial-thought during the late nineteenth century period when Wood wrote his famous nuisance law treatise. Next I review J.B. Ruhl's argument for nuisance law's recognition of the ecosystem services provided by wetlands. I then turn to how theories of environmental ethics - focusing upon the recent work of both Christian writers and legal scholars - can aid an evaluation of ecological nuisances and other legal regulation of wetlands. The essay concludes that ecological nuisances should not be the law's only response to the study of ecosystem services, but they offer a valuable tool that is available to individual landowners as they continue to work out their own understanding of the ethical values of their land.","PeriodicalId":80897,"journal":{"name":"Case Western Reserve law review","volume":"58 1","pages":"787"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Western Reserve law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1346983","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This essay shows how ecological nuisances should be accepted under longstanding principles of nuisance law. Ecological nuisances build upon the flexible history of nuisance law's response to changed attitudes toward interferences with land use. I use the example of wetlands to illustrate ecological nuisances. Wetlands are an especially appropriate example because they are featured in many recent environmental disputes, and because the societal understanding of wetlands has changed so dramatically during the past century. On the other hand, a theory of ecological nuisances is not limited to wetlands. Ecosystems of all types provide services, and the interference with those services could constitute a nuisance. I begin by describing the swamps that were the bane of societal-including judicial-thought during the late nineteenth century period when Wood wrote his famous nuisance law treatise. Next I review J.B. Ruhl's argument for nuisance law's recognition of the ecosystem services provided by wetlands. I then turn to how theories of environmental ethics - focusing upon the recent work of both Christian writers and legal scholars - can aid an evaluation of ecological nuisances and other legal regulation of wetlands. The essay concludes that ecological nuisances should not be the law's only response to the study of ecosystem services, but they offer a valuable tool that is available to individual landowners as they continue to work out their own understanding of the ethical values of their land.
从沼泽排水到湿地管制,从生态滋扰到环境伦理
这篇文章展示了生态滋扰应该如何在妨害法的长期原则下被接受。生态滋扰建立在滋扰法对改变对土地使用的态度的反应的灵活历史之上。我用湿地的例子来说明生态公害。湿地是一个特别合适的例子,因为它们是最近许多环境争议的重点,而且因为在过去的一个世纪里,社会对湿地的理解发生了巨大的变化。另一方面,生态滋扰的理论并不局限于湿地。所有类型的生态系统都提供服务,对这些服务的干扰可能构成滋扰。我首先描述了在伍德撰写他著名的妨害法专著的19世纪后期,沼泽是社会——包括司法——思想的祸根。接下来,我将回顾J.B.鲁尔关于妨害法承认湿地提供的生态系统服务的论点。然后,我转向环境伦理理论——关注基督教作家和法律学者最近的工作——如何帮助评估生态滋扰和湿地的其他法律法规。这篇文章的结论是,生态滋扰不应该是法律对生态系统服务研究的唯一回应,但它们为土地所有者个人提供了一个有价值的工具,因为他们继续对自己的土地的道德价值进行理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书