Amphetamine-Induced Conditioned Place Preference and Modeling Domains of Bipolar Disorder

S. Flaisher-Grinberg, H. Einat
{"title":"Amphetamine-Induced Conditioned Place Preference and Modeling Domains of Bipolar Disorder","authors":"S. Flaisher-Grinberg, H. Einat","doi":"10.2174/1876523801104010018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The development of appropriate models for bipolar disorder (BPD) is a critical step in the efforts to further study the underlying pathology of the disorder and develop novel treatments. One approach to achieve better models is to develop a battery of tests for the different behavioral domains of the disease. Previous work examined ways to model reward-related behaviors in the context of BPD with some success. Because disregulation of the reward system is one of the hallmarks of BPD the present study was designed to evaluate the possibility of using amphetamine-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) as an additional method to model the reward seeking behavioral domain in BPD. To evaluate the pharmacological (predictive) validity of amphetamine-i nduced CPP for BPD, the study examined the effects of the prototypic mood stabilizer lithium in a biased (black/white) amphetamine-induced CPP paradigm. To delineate generalized effects of drugs, animals were also tested for locomotor activity at the end of the CPP paradigm. As expected, amphetamine pairing resulted in the development of CPP, evidenced by an increase in the time spent in the paired compartment from pre-conditioning to post-conditioning sessions. Lithium had no effects on the expression of CPP or on locomotor activity. The results suggest that amphetamine-induced CPP lacks pharmacological validity and it is therefore not a good choice as a model for the reward-seeking domain of BPD. Additional tests should be explored as suitable modes for this important component of the disorder.","PeriodicalId":88752,"journal":{"name":"The open neuropsychopharmacology journal","volume":"4 1","pages":"18-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The open neuropsychopharmacology journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1876523801104010018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The development of appropriate models for bipolar disorder (BPD) is a critical step in the efforts to further study the underlying pathology of the disorder and develop novel treatments. One approach to achieve better models is to develop a battery of tests for the different behavioral domains of the disease. Previous work examined ways to model reward-related behaviors in the context of BPD with some success. Because disregulation of the reward system is one of the hallmarks of BPD the present study was designed to evaluate the possibility of using amphetamine-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) as an additional method to model the reward seeking behavioral domain in BPD. To evaluate the pharmacological (predictive) validity of amphetamine-i nduced CPP for BPD, the study examined the effects of the prototypic mood stabilizer lithium in a biased (black/white) amphetamine-induced CPP paradigm. To delineate generalized effects of drugs, animals were also tested for locomotor activity at the end of the CPP paradigm. As expected, amphetamine pairing resulted in the development of CPP, evidenced by an increase in the time spent in the paired compartment from pre-conditioning to post-conditioning sessions. Lithium had no effects on the expression of CPP or on locomotor activity. The results suggest that amphetamine-induced CPP lacks pharmacological validity and it is therefore not a good choice as a model for the reward-seeking domain of BPD. Additional tests should be explored as suitable modes for this important component of the disorder.
安非他明诱导的条件位置偏好与双相情感障碍的建模域
建立合适的双相情感障碍(BPD)模型是进一步研究该疾病的潜在病理和开发新的治疗方法的关键一步。获得更好模型的一种方法是针对该疾病的不同行为领域开发一系列测试。先前的工作研究了在BPD背景下建立奖励相关行为模型的方法,并取得了一些成功。由于奖励系统失调是BPD的特征之一,本研究旨在评估使用安非他明诱导的条件位置偏好(CPP)作为BPD中寻求奖励行为领域模型的可能性。为了评估安非他明诱导的CPP对BPD的药理学(预测)有效性,该研究在有偏(黑/白)安非他明诱导的CPP范式中检测了原型情绪稳定剂锂的作用。为了描述药物的普遍作用,在CPP模式结束时,还测试了动物的运动活动。正如预期的那样,安非他明配对导致CPP的发展,从预处理到后适应阶段在配对隔间中花费的时间增加证明了这一点。锂对CPP的表达和运动活性没有影响。结果表明,安非他明诱导的CPP缺乏药理学有效性,因此它不是一个很好的选择作为BPD的奖励寻求领域的模型。对于这种疾病的重要组成部分,应该探索其他测试作为合适的模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信