Avoidance of Early Post-Operative Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (EPIC) Following Peritonectomy with Heated Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) Significantly Reduces Cost and Hospital Stay

R. Kirby, Jing Zhao, T. Chua, W. Liauw, D. Morris
{"title":"Avoidance of Early Post-Operative Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (EPIC) Following Peritonectomy with Heated Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) Significantly Reduces Cost and Hospital Stay","authors":"R. Kirby, Jing Zhao, T. Chua, W. Liauw, D. Morris","doi":"10.2174/1876504101405010001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: Peritoneal carcinomatosis is treated with Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and Heated Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) with or without Early Postoperative Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (EPIC) depending on the pathology involved. Since 2010 heated intraperitoneal oxaliplatin has been utilised in our institution. Our aim was to determine if there was a significant cost difference between patients receiving oxaliplatin and those requiring five additional days of EPIC. Methods: We retrospectively analysed 30 patients from our database. 15 patients underwent cytoreductive surgery, heated intraperitoneal oxaliplatin (350mg/m 2 ) and 5-fluorouracil (FU) intravenously administered intraoperatively. We compared those patients with 15 patients who underwent CRS, heated intraperitoneal mitomycin C (10-25mg/m 2 ) as well as EPIC with 5-FU (600-800mg/m 2 ) on postoperative days 1 to 5. Patients were matched for age, gender, pathology and peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI). Results: There was no significant difference between radiology (p=0.6) and transfusion costs (p=0.4). The chemotherapy costs in the oxaliplatin group were significantly higher (p=0.001) however overall bed costs including ward, HDU and ICU were significantly lower in the oxaliplatin group (p 0.029). There was a higher percentage of patients in the EPIC group that had postoperative ileus (p 0.4), rate of infection (p 0.1), fistula formation (p 0.03), return to theatre (p 0.2) and collection formation (p 0.07) compared to the oxaliplatin group. The overall cost was significantly lower in the oxaliplatin group (p 0.038). There was no significant survival benefit between both groups (p 0.3). Conclusion: In colorectal cancer the cost and complications of EPIC following HIPEC are unjustified. We now use oxaliplatin HIPEC as our standard regimen in colorectal cancer and appendiceal adenocarcinoma.","PeriodicalId":89705,"journal":{"name":"Open surgical oncology journal (Online)","volume":"40 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open surgical oncology journal (Online)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1876504101405010001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aims: Peritoneal carcinomatosis is treated with Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and Heated Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) with or without Early Postoperative Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (EPIC) depending on the pathology involved. Since 2010 heated intraperitoneal oxaliplatin has been utilised in our institution. Our aim was to determine if there was a significant cost difference between patients receiving oxaliplatin and those requiring five additional days of EPIC. Methods: We retrospectively analysed 30 patients from our database. 15 patients underwent cytoreductive surgery, heated intraperitoneal oxaliplatin (350mg/m 2 ) and 5-fluorouracil (FU) intravenously administered intraoperatively. We compared those patients with 15 patients who underwent CRS, heated intraperitoneal mitomycin C (10-25mg/m 2 ) as well as EPIC with 5-FU (600-800mg/m 2 ) on postoperative days 1 to 5. Patients were matched for age, gender, pathology and peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI). Results: There was no significant difference between radiology (p=0.6) and transfusion costs (p=0.4). The chemotherapy costs in the oxaliplatin group were significantly higher (p=0.001) however overall bed costs including ward, HDU and ICU were significantly lower in the oxaliplatin group (p 0.029). There was a higher percentage of patients in the EPIC group that had postoperative ileus (p 0.4), rate of infection (p 0.1), fistula formation (p 0.03), return to theatre (p 0.2) and collection formation (p 0.07) compared to the oxaliplatin group. The overall cost was significantly lower in the oxaliplatin group (p 0.038). There was no significant survival benefit between both groups (p 0.3). Conclusion: In colorectal cancer the cost and complications of EPIC following HIPEC are unjustified. We now use oxaliplatin HIPEC as our standard regimen in colorectal cancer and appendiceal adenocarcinoma.
腹膜切除术后热腹腔化疗(HIPEC)避免早期术后腹腔化疗(EPIC)可显著降低成本和住院时间
目的:腹膜癌的治疗是通过细胞减少手术(CRS)和加热腹腔化疗(HIPEC),根据所涉及的病理,有或没有术后早期腹腔化疗(EPIC)。自2010年以来,我们机构开始使用加热腹腔奥沙利铂。我们的目的是确定接受奥沙利铂的患者和需要额外5天EPIC的患者之间是否存在显著的成本差异。方法:我们回顾性分析了数据库中的30例患者。15例患者行细胞减缩术,术中给予奥沙利铂(350mg/ m2)腹腔加热和5-氟尿嘧啶(FU)静脉注射。我们将这些患者与15例患者进行了比较,这些患者在术后第1至5天接受了CRS,加热腹膜内丝裂霉素C (10-25mg/ m2)以及EPIC与5- fu (600-800mg/ m2)。患者根据年龄、性别、病理和腹膜癌指数(PCI)进行匹配。结果:放射学(p=0.6)和输血费用(p=0.4)无显著差异。奥沙利铂组化疗费用显著增高(p=0.001),但奥沙利铂组包括病房、HDU和ICU在内的总床位费用显著降低(p= 0.029)。与奥沙利铂组相比,EPIC组患者术后肠梗阻(p 0.4)、感染率(p 0.1)、瘘管形成(p 0.03)、返回手术室(p 0.2)和收集形成(p 0.07)的比例更高。奥沙利铂组的总成本显著降低(p 0.038)。两组间无显著生存获益(p < 0.3)。结论:结直肠癌HIPEC后EPIC的成本和并发症是不合理的。我们现在使用奥沙利铂HIPEC作为结直肠癌和阑尾腺癌的标准治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信