{"title":"Online Access to Court Records - From Documents to Data, Particulars to Patterns","authors":"Peter W. Martin","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1107412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For over a decade the public has had remote access to federal court records held in electronic format, including documents filed by litigants and judicial rulings. First available via dial-up connections, access migrated to the Web in 1998. That and a succession of other improvements to the federal \"Public Access to Court Electronic Records\" system or PACER prompted the Administrative Office of the United States Courts to proclaim in 2001 that \"the advancement of technology has brought the citizen ever closer to the courthouse.\" Unquestionably, what the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts and Judicial Conference of the United States have built offers citizens, businesses, journalists, and scholars unprecedented access to the details of individual court proceedings. But to hold PACER in that frame is to miss much of its impact. Moreover, some of the gains one might hope or expect to flow from enhanced judicial transparency remain largely untouched by this system. The article explores PACER's evolution, larger impact, and unrealized possibilities. It then proceeds to examine why state courts are, in general, approaching online access to court records so differently.","PeriodicalId":83467,"journal":{"name":"Villanova law review","volume":"53 1","pages":"855"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Villanova law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1107412","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17
Abstract
For over a decade the public has had remote access to federal court records held in electronic format, including documents filed by litigants and judicial rulings. First available via dial-up connections, access migrated to the Web in 1998. That and a succession of other improvements to the federal "Public Access to Court Electronic Records" system or PACER prompted the Administrative Office of the United States Courts to proclaim in 2001 that "the advancement of technology has brought the citizen ever closer to the courthouse." Unquestionably, what the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts and Judicial Conference of the United States have built offers citizens, businesses, journalists, and scholars unprecedented access to the details of individual court proceedings. But to hold PACER in that frame is to miss much of its impact. Moreover, some of the gains one might hope or expect to flow from enhanced judicial transparency remain largely untouched by this system. The article explores PACER's evolution, larger impact, and unrealized possibilities. It then proceeds to examine why state courts are, in general, approaching online access to court records so differently.
十多年来,公众已经可以远程访问以电子格式保存的联邦法院记录,包括诉讼当事人提交的文件和司法裁决。最初通过拨号连接获得,1998年迁移到Web。这一举措以及对联邦“法院电子记录公共访问”系统(简称PACER)的一系列其他改进,促使美国法院行政办公室(Administrative Office of United States Courts)在2001年宣布,“技术的进步使公民离法院更近了。”毫无疑问,美国法院行政办公室和美国司法会议所建立的网站为公民、企业、记者和学者提供了前所未有的获取个别法院诉讼细节的途径。但是,把PACER放在这个框架里,就会错过它的大部分影响。此外,人们可能希望或期望从提高司法透明度中获得的一些好处在很大程度上仍未受到这一制度的影响。本文将探讨PACER的演变、更大的影响和未实现的可能性。然后,它进一步研究了为什么州法院在网上获取法庭记录的方式上总体上如此不同。