Proximal Humeral Fracture; Predictors of Functional and Radiologic Outcome

M. Soleymani, M. Nabian, Asma Mafhoumi, B. Panjavi, Leila Oriadi Zanjani, S. Mehrpour
{"title":"Proximal Humeral Fracture; Predictors of Functional and Radiologic Outcome","authors":"M. Soleymani, M. Nabian, Asma Mafhoumi, B. Panjavi, Leila Oriadi Zanjani, S. Mehrpour","doi":"10.18502/jost.v9i2.12826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Despite the high prevalence of proximal humeral fracture, one of the most prevalent osteoporotic fractures, its treatment has always been challenging. Here we are going to determine the factors that affect the outcomes of such fractures. \nMethods: The present retrograde cohort study was conducted in a tertiary trauma center during 2015-2020. The Neer classification was used to classify fracture severity. Patients’ functional status was measured using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and Constant-Murley Score (CMS). Patients were selected thorough purposive sampling method. \nResults: The study participants included 70 patients with a mean age of 50.47 ± 16.73 years. The 3 treatment options of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) (39 cases; 52%), hemiarthroplasty (3 cases; 4%), and conservative treatment (33 patients; 44%) were considered. Malunion was the most prevalent complication in the study population (9 cases; 12%). The mean DASH score of the participants was 29.91 ± 20.43. The mean DASH score in patients of over 65 years of age was higher than in those under 65 years (36.97 vs. 28.14; P = 0.136). The score in patients underwent surgery (ORIF and hemiarthroplasty) showed a significant difference compared to the patients who were treated non-surgically (P = 0.050). The mean CMS of participants was 64.09 ± 22.71. The mean age of patients classified as “poor” was significantly higher than the “excellent” group (P = 0.041). The mean visual analogue scale (VAS) score of the participants was 2.80 ± 2.49. The VAS score was significantly higher in patients with more severe fracture based on the Neer classification (P = 0.050).  \nConclusion: The present study results showed the significant effect of age, fracture severity, and underlying disease on the proximal humeral fracture outcome. A longer follow-up period was observed in patients who had better functional outcomes. However, more studies with larger sample size are required to evaluate proximal humeral fracture outcomes in order to help us to improve outcomes and reduce complications.","PeriodicalId":34870,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopedic and Spine Trauma","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopedic and Spine Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jost.v9i2.12826","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite the high prevalence of proximal humeral fracture, one of the most prevalent osteoporotic fractures, its treatment has always been challenging. Here we are going to determine the factors that affect the outcomes of such fractures. Methods: The present retrograde cohort study was conducted in a tertiary trauma center during 2015-2020. The Neer classification was used to classify fracture severity. Patients’ functional status was measured using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and Constant-Murley Score (CMS). Patients were selected thorough purposive sampling method. Results: The study participants included 70 patients with a mean age of 50.47 ± 16.73 years. The 3 treatment options of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) (39 cases; 52%), hemiarthroplasty (3 cases; 4%), and conservative treatment (33 patients; 44%) were considered. Malunion was the most prevalent complication in the study population (9 cases; 12%). The mean DASH score of the participants was 29.91 ± 20.43. The mean DASH score in patients of over 65 years of age was higher than in those under 65 years (36.97 vs. 28.14; P = 0.136). The score in patients underwent surgery (ORIF and hemiarthroplasty) showed a significant difference compared to the patients who were treated non-surgically (P = 0.050). The mean CMS of participants was 64.09 ± 22.71. The mean age of patients classified as “poor” was significantly higher than the “excellent” group (P = 0.041). The mean visual analogue scale (VAS) score of the participants was 2.80 ± 2.49. The VAS score was significantly higher in patients with more severe fracture based on the Neer classification (P = 0.050).  Conclusion: The present study results showed the significant effect of age, fracture severity, and underlying disease on the proximal humeral fracture outcome. A longer follow-up period was observed in patients who had better functional outcomes. However, more studies with larger sample size are required to evaluate proximal humeral fracture outcomes in order to help us to improve outcomes and reduce complications.
肱骨近端骨折;功能和放射预后的预测因素
背景:尽管肱骨近端骨折是最常见的骨质疏松性骨折之一,但其治疗一直具有挑战性。在这里,我们将确定影响此类骨折结果的因素。方法:本逆行队列研究于2015-2020年在某三级创伤中心进行。骨折严重程度采用Neer分级。采用手臂、肩膀和手的残疾(DASH)问卷和Constant-Murley评分(CMS)来测量患者的功能状态。采用目的抽样的方法对患者进行抽样。结果:纳入70例患者,平均年龄50.47±16.73岁。切开复位内固定(ORIF) 3种治疗方案(39例;52%),半关节置换术(3例;4%),保守治疗(33例;44%)。畸形愈合是研究人群中最常见的并发症(9例;12%)。参与者的DASH平均得分为29.91±20.43。65岁以上患者的平均DASH评分高于65岁以下患者(36.97比28.14;P = 0.136)。手术治疗组(ORIF和半关节置换术)与非手术治疗组的评分差异有统计学意义(P = 0.050)。参与者的平均CMS为64.09±22.71。“差”组患者平均年龄明显高于“优”组(P = 0.041)。受试者的视觉模拟评分(VAS)平均为2.80±2.49分。根据Neer分级,骨折越严重的患者VAS评分越高(P = 0.050)。结论:本研究结果显示年龄、骨折严重程度和基础疾病对肱骨近端骨折的预后有显著影响。功能预后较好的患者随访时间较长。然而,需要更多样本量更大的研究来评估肱骨近端骨折的预后,以帮助我们改善预后并减少并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信