{"title":"Marriage Equality, United States v. Windsor , and the Crisis in Equal Protection Jurisprudence","authors":"S. Pollvogt","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2350973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay reads United States v. Windsor as a tacit admission of the failure of the traditional doctrinal features of equal protection analysis and examines the problems that might have been raised had the Court applied those traditional doctrines to the problem of marriage equality.","PeriodicalId":81461,"journal":{"name":"Hofstra law review","volume":"42 1","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hofstra law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2350973","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This essay reads United States v. Windsor as a tacit admission of the failure of the traditional doctrinal features of equal protection analysis and examines the problems that might have been raised had the Court applied those traditional doctrines to the problem of marriage equality.