Repeatability of Measurements of Galvanic Skin Response – A Pilot Study

J. Muller, Wim Pet, Ellen Pet-Reatsch, Riek Servaas, Femke Ansems, D. Schwander, H. Lothaller
{"title":"Repeatability of Measurements of Galvanic Skin Response – A Pilot Study","authors":"J. Muller, Wim Pet, Ellen Pet-Reatsch, Riek Servaas, Femke Ansems, D. Schwander, H. Lothaller","doi":"10.2174/1876391X01305010011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To scrutinize repeatability of measurements of galvanic skin response (GSR) using a complementary therapy device. Methods: GSR diagnosis is closely related to the Chinese system of acupuncture points. These are assumed to show increased electrical conductivity that is super influenced by the (stressed or weak) state of related organs and organ systems including the vagal / simpatico system. GSR techniques apply a constant voltage. For the device used here, a \"biophoton therapy device\", a circuit includes a brass electrode that is held in one hand of the test person, and a style electrode for contact with his or her other hand. When the organism is exposed to external influences, skin conductivity may change within split seconds (increase or decrease). Here, it was aimed to transfer information from test substances into the circuit. Paracetamol® was dissolved in water, and both this test probe and control water were put into quartz glass vials. Following a sequence unknown to the tester, the vials were inserted into the input quartz-glass beaker of the device. A decrease in skin conductivity due to the information from Paracetamol ® is assumed to be measurable at the acupuncture point \"TW-1D-lefthand-pituitary gland\". Repeated measurements with breaks for recovery were carried out. Three sub studies consisted of 5 unblinded and 10 blinded tests each. Depending on the sub study, one to five different tested volunteers and testers were involved. Data were analyzed blind using a two-way analysis of variance with treatment (i.e. test or control) and sub study as independent variables and the frequency of diagnosed indicator drops as the dependent variable. Furthermore, frequency of diagnosed indicator drops was compared to the frequency of non drops both for the test and the control probe in four field tables. In a random distribution, one would expect about 50% in each of the four fields. Results: A significant main effect for treatment group was observed over all three studies (p .05), indicating that there were no differences between the three sub studies. In addition, no interaction effect between the variables treatment group and sub study was found (p>.05). This means that (a) the significant overall difference between treatment groups holds for each sub study in the same way and (b) the non-difference between sub studies holds both for intoxication and non-treatment. In terms of the pooled results of all three substudies the test probe was correctly detected in 77.5% of cases, with 22.5% false positive results. In reverse, the neutre control was correctly diagnosed in 68.6%, with 31.4% false negative results. Conclusion: Results suggest that information from substances can influence biological systems and that measurements of electric skin conductivity, as used for diagnostic purposes, are repeatable under standardized and blind conditions.","PeriodicalId":89728,"journal":{"name":"The open complementary medicine journal","volume":"10 1","pages":"11-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The open complementary medicine journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1876391X01305010011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Objective: To scrutinize repeatability of measurements of galvanic skin response (GSR) using a complementary therapy device. Methods: GSR diagnosis is closely related to the Chinese system of acupuncture points. These are assumed to show increased electrical conductivity that is super influenced by the (stressed or weak) state of related organs and organ systems including the vagal / simpatico system. GSR techniques apply a constant voltage. For the device used here, a "biophoton therapy device", a circuit includes a brass electrode that is held in one hand of the test person, and a style electrode for contact with his or her other hand. When the organism is exposed to external influences, skin conductivity may change within split seconds (increase or decrease). Here, it was aimed to transfer information from test substances into the circuit. Paracetamol® was dissolved in water, and both this test probe and control water were put into quartz glass vials. Following a sequence unknown to the tester, the vials were inserted into the input quartz-glass beaker of the device. A decrease in skin conductivity due to the information from Paracetamol ® is assumed to be measurable at the acupuncture point "TW-1D-lefthand-pituitary gland". Repeated measurements with breaks for recovery were carried out. Three sub studies consisted of 5 unblinded and 10 blinded tests each. Depending on the sub study, one to five different tested volunteers and testers were involved. Data were analyzed blind using a two-way analysis of variance with treatment (i.e. test or control) and sub study as independent variables and the frequency of diagnosed indicator drops as the dependent variable. Furthermore, frequency of diagnosed indicator drops was compared to the frequency of non drops both for the test and the control probe in four field tables. In a random distribution, one would expect about 50% in each of the four fields. Results: A significant main effect for treatment group was observed over all three studies (p .05), indicating that there were no differences between the three sub studies. In addition, no interaction effect between the variables treatment group and sub study was found (p>.05). This means that (a) the significant overall difference between treatment groups holds for each sub study in the same way and (b) the non-difference between sub studies holds both for intoxication and non-treatment. In terms of the pooled results of all three substudies the test probe was correctly detected in 77.5% of cases, with 22.5% false positive results. In reverse, the neutre control was correctly diagnosed in 68.6%, with 31.4% false negative results. Conclusion: Results suggest that information from substances can influence biological systems and that measurements of electric skin conductivity, as used for diagnostic purposes, are repeatable under standardized and blind conditions.
皮肤电反应测量的可重复性-一项初步研究
目的:探讨使用辅助治疗装置测量皮肤电反应(GSR)的可重复性。方法:GSR诊断与中医穴位系统密切相关。这些被认为表明电导率的增加受到相关器官和包括迷走神经/交感神经系统在内的器官系统(应激或弱)状态的超级影响。GSR技术施加恒定电压。对于这里使用的装置,“生物光子治疗装置”,电路包括一个黄铜电极,该电极被握在测试人员的一只手上,以及一个与他或她的另一只手接触的风格电极。当生物体受到外部影响时,皮肤电导率可能在几秒钟内发生变化(增加或减少)。在这里,它的目的是将信息从测试物质传递到电路中。将扑热息痛®溶于水中,将该测试探针和对照水分别放入石英玻璃瓶中。按照测试人员不知道的顺序,将小瓶插入设备的输入石英玻璃烧杯中。皮肤电导率的下降是由于扑热息痛®的信息被认为是可测量的穴位“tw - 1d -左脑垂体”。为了恢复,进行了多次测量。三个子研究分别由5个非盲法试验和10个盲法试验组成。根据子研究的不同,有一到五名不同的志愿者和测试人员参与其中。采用以治疗(即试验或对照)和子研究为自变量,诊断指标下降频率为因变量的双向方差分析,对数据进行盲法分析。此外,在四个现场表中,对测试和控制探头的诊断指标下降频率与非下降频率进行了比较。在随机分布中,四个领域各占50%左右。结果:治疗组在三个研究中均观察到显著的主效应(p . 0.05),表明三个亚研究之间无差异。此外,治疗组与子研究变量间无交互作用(p < 0.05)。这意味着(a)治疗组之间的显著总体差异以同样的方式存在于每个子研究中,(b)子研究之间的无差异在中毒和非治疗中都存在。在所有三个子研究的汇总结果中,检测探针在77.5%的病例中被正确检测,假阳性结果为22.5%。相反,中性对照的正确诊断率为68.6%,假阴性结果为31.4%。结论:结果表明,来自物质的信息可以影响生物系统,并且用于诊断目的的皮肤电导率测量在标准化和盲条件下是可重复的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书