For Whom the Little Bells Toll: Recent Judgments by International Tribunals on the Legality of Cluster Munitions

Virgil Wiebe
{"title":"For Whom the Little Bells Toll: Recent Judgments by International Tribunals on the Legality of Cluster Munitions","authors":"Virgil Wiebe","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1008990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"Little bells\" refer to cluster bomblets in Serbo-Croatian. Two international tribunals recently have found defendants liable for civilian deaths caused by cluster munitions. These decisions may herald a turning point in the regulation of these weapons. In 2004, the Eritrea-Ethiopia Claims Commission held Eritrea liable for civilians killed in cluster munition strikes on Mekele, Ethiopia. On June 12, 2007, the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia held the former president of the now defunct Serbian Republic of Krajina criminally liable for deaths and injuries resulting from cluster munition rocket attacks on Zagreb. Cluster bombs came back onto the world stage during the 2006 war between Israel and Hezbollah, with both sides of the conflict deploying the weapon in irresponsible ways. By early 2007, momentum had gathered for a treaty banning cluster bombs. Efforts are also underway at the national level to regulate their use. The two judgments have much to contribute to the current debate over how to eliminate or limit the humanitarian impact of cluster munitions. These cases are the only ones to date to address several humanitarian law issues in the debate over cluster munition regulation. Adjudicators grappled with whether the characteristics of cluster munitions can be used as evidence of intent to attack civilians or of indiscriminate and disproportionate attacks; what precautions users of these weapons must take in advance; and what role does foreknowledge about the wide area nature as well as landmine-like effects of cluster munitions have on culpability. This article analyzes the two judgments in detail and presents lessons to be learned: A. Advance Awareness of Cluster Weapon Characteristics Can Lead to Criminal Liability B. The Use of Unguided Cluster Munitions With Wide Area Effects May Lead to Criminal Liability C. Cluster Munition Use Against Military Targets in Civilian Areas Should Be Presumptively Off-Limits D. Restricting Cluster Munition Use Should Not Be Seen as a Green Light to Use Even More Destructive Weapons Indiscriminately E. Duds Matter: Probable Harm in the Immediate and Longer Term Aftermath Must Be a Part of the Proportionality Equation F. Magic Bullets? Why Trying to Build Better Cluster Bombs Does Not Resolve All the Indiscriminate Effects Associated with Their Use","PeriodicalId":82287,"journal":{"name":"Pepperdine law review","volume":"35 1","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pepperdine law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1008990","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

"Little bells" refer to cluster bomblets in Serbo-Croatian. Two international tribunals recently have found defendants liable for civilian deaths caused by cluster munitions. These decisions may herald a turning point in the regulation of these weapons. In 2004, the Eritrea-Ethiopia Claims Commission held Eritrea liable for civilians killed in cluster munition strikes on Mekele, Ethiopia. On June 12, 2007, the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia held the former president of the now defunct Serbian Republic of Krajina criminally liable for deaths and injuries resulting from cluster munition rocket attacks on Zagreb. Cluster bombs came back onto the world stage during the 2006 war between Israel and Hezbollah, with both sides of the conflict deploying the weapon in irresponsible ways. By early 2007, momentum had gathered for a treaty banning cluster bombs. Efforts are also underway at the national level to regulate their use. The two judgments have much to contribute to the current debate over how to eliminate or limit the humanitarian impact of cluster munitions. These cases are the only ones to date to address several humanitarian law issues in the debate over cluster munition regulation. Adjudicators grappled with whether the characteristics of cluster munitions can be used as evidence of intent to attack civilians or of indiscriminate and disproportionate attacks; what precautions users of these weapons must take in advance; and what role does foreknowledge about the wide area nature as well as landmine-like effects of cluster munitions have on culpability. This article analyzes the two judgments in detail and presents lessons to be learned: A. Advance Awareness of Cluster Weapon Characteristics Can Lead to Criminal Liability B. The Use of Unguided Cluster Munitions With Wide Area Effects May Lead to Criminal Liability C. Cluster Munition Use Against Military Targets in Civilian Areas Should Be Presumptively Off-Limits D. Restricting Cluster Munition Use Should Not Be Seen as a Green Light to Use Even More Destructive Weapons Indiscriminately E. Duds Matter: Probable Harm in the Immediate and Longer Term Aftermath Must Be a Part of the Proportionality Equation F. Magic Bullets? Why Trying to Build Better Cluster Bombs Does Not Resolve All the Indiscriminate Effects Associated with Their Use
《丧钟为谁而鸣:国际法庭对集束弹药合法性的最新判决》
“小铃铛”在塞尔维亚-克罗地亚语中是指集束炸弹。两个国际法庭最近裁定被告应对集束弹药造成的平民死亡负责。这些决定可能预示着管制这些武器的一个转折点。2004年,厄立特里亚-埃塞俄比亚索赔委员会认为厄立特里亚应对在埃塞俄比亚Mekele集束弹药袭击中丧生的平民负责。2007年6月12日,前南斯拉夫问题国际刑事法庭判定现已不存在的克拉伊纳塞尔维亚共和国前总统对萨格勒布集束弹药火箭弹袭击造成的伤亡负有刑事责任。2006年以色列和真主党之间的战争期间,集束炸弹重新回到了世界舞台,冲突双方都以不负责任的方式部署了这种武器。到2007年初,签署禁止集束炸弹条约的势头已经积聚。国家层面也在努力规范它们的使用。这两项判决对当前关于如何消除或限制集束弹药的人道主义影响的辩论大有帮助。这些案例是迄今为止在关于集束弹药管制的辩论中处理若干人道主义法问题的仅有案例。裁判人员努力解决集束弹药的特征是否可以作为意图攻击平民或不分青红皂白和不成比例攻击的证据;这些武器的使用者必须事先采取哪些预防措施;关于集束弹药的广域性质和类似地雷的影响的预见对罪责有什么作用?本文对这两个判决进行了详细的分析,并提出了值得借鉴的经验教训:a .事先了解集束武器的特性可能导致刑事责任B.使用具有广域效应的非制导集束弹药可能导致刑事责任C.对平民区军事目标使用集束弹药应被推定为禁止D.限制集束弹药的使用不应被视为不加区分地使用更具破坏性武器的绿灯E.弹药问题:短期和长期后果可能造成的伤害必须是比例方程的一部分。为什么试图制造更好的集束炸弹并不能解决与使用集束炸弹相关的所有滥杀滥伤效应
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信