Comparison between Sinc approximation and differential transform methods for nonlinear Hammerstein integral equations

Q4 Mathematics
G. K. Gelian, R. Shirvani, M. A. Araghi
{"title":"Comparison between Sinc approximation and differential transform methods for nonlinear Hammerstein integral equations","authors":"G. K. Gelian, R. Shirvani, M. A. Araghi","doi":"10.22075/IJNAA.2020.19923.2111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Here, the comparison between Sinc method in combination with double exponential transformations (DE) and approximation by means of differential transform method (DTM) for nonlinear Hammerstein integral equations is considered. Convergence analysis is presented. Detection of effectiveness from various aspects such as run time, different norms, condition number are highlighted and plotted graphically. Results of two schemes are practically well, but in manner of separable kernel, DTM solution is more accurate and so fast.","PeriodicalId":14240,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications","volume":"25 1","pages":"1291-1301"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22075/IJNAA.2020.19923.2111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Here, the comparison between Sinc method in combination with double exponential transformations (DE) and approximation by means of differential transform method (DTM) for nonlinear Hammerstein integral equations is considered. Convergence analysis is presented. Detection of effectiveness from various aspects such as run time, different norms, condition number are highlighted and plotted graphically. Results of two schemes are practically well, but in manner of separable kernel, DTM solution is more accurate and so fast.
非线性Hammerstein积分方程的Sinc逼近与微分变换方法的比较
本文对非线性Hammerstein积分方程的Sinc法与双指数变换法(DE)和微分变换近似法(DTM)进行了比较。给出了收敛性分析。从运行时间、不同规范、条件数等方面突出显示了检测的有效性,并绘制了图形。两种方案的实际结果都很好,但在可分离核的情况下,DTM解决方案更准确,速度更快。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
160
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信