Haematology and serum biochemistry parameters in vaccinated versus unvaccinated captive Cuvier’s gazelles: Implications for zoo management practices

IF 0.7 Q4 ZOOLOGY
Belén Ibáñez, D. Andres-Cara, E. Moreno
{"title":"Haematology and serum biochemistry parameters in vaccinated versus unvaccinated captive Cuvier’s gazelles: Implications for zoo management practices","authors":"Belén Ibáñez, D. Andres-Cara, E. Moreno","doi":"10.19227/JZAR.V4I1.157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wild ungulates kept in captivity have become increasingly important as stock for conservation and study. Routine preventive treatment and vaccination is used to reduce parasite density and/or minimize parasite transmission in multispecies captive facilities such as zoos. But vaccination also has disadvantages: animals are not allowed to develop a natural immune response, commensal parasites performing beneficial roles are also removed, handling the host species is difficult, and so forth. Even more problems arise when captive wild animals are bred for reintroduction into the wild, as the use of parasite-naive individuals may lead to failure. In this study we evaluate the need for such treatment in a Cuvier’s gazelle captive population. Our results show that there are no major differences in body weight or health status between sanitized (wormed and vaccinated) individuals and those that are not. These results challenge the need for routine preventive vaccination in wild animals in captivity. We suggest that the advantages and disadvantages of vaccination of the studied population be weighed and balanced, and recommend that in absence of symptoms, regular coprological analysis be performed, vaccinating only when the parasite burden becomes pathological.","PeriodicalId":56160,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Zoo and Aquarium Research","volume":"4 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Zoo and Aquarium Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19227/JZAR.V4I1.157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Wild ungulates kept in captivity have become increasingly important as stock for conservation and study. Routine preventive treatment and vaccination is used to reduce parasite density and/or minimize parasite transmission in multispecies captive facilities such as zoos. But vaccination also has disadvantages: animals are not allowed to develop a natural immune response, commensal parasites performing beneficial roles are also removed, handling the host species is difficult, and so forth. Even more problems arise when captive wild animals are bred for reintroduction into the wild, as the use of parasite-naive individuals may lead to failure. In this study we evaluate the need for such treatment in a Cuvier’s gazelle captive population. Our results show that there are no major differences in body weight or health status between sanitized (wormed and vaccinated) individuals and those that are not. These results challenge the need for routine preventive vaccination in wild animals in captivity. We suggest that the advantages and disadvantages of vaccination of the studied population be weighed and balanced, and recommend that in absence of symptoms, regular coprological analysis be performed, vaccinating only when the parasite burden becomes pathological.
圈养居维叶瞪羚羊接种疫苗与未接种疫苗的血液学和血清生化参数:对动物园管理实践的影响
圈养的野生有蹄类动物作为保护和研究的资源变得越来越重要。在动物园等多物种圈养设施中,常规预防性治疗和疫苗接种用于降低寄生虫密度和/或尽量减少寄生虫传播。但是疫苗接种也有缺点:动物不允许产生自然免疫反应,发挥有益作用的共生寄生虫也被移除,处理宿主物种很困难,等等。当圈养的野生动物被繁殖并放归野外时,甚至会出现更多的问题,因为使用未感染寄生虫的个体可能会导致失败。在这项研究中,我们评估了居维叶瞪羚圈养种群中这种治疗的必要性。我们的研究结果表明,在经过消毒的个体(蠕虫和接种疫苗)和没有经过消毒的个体之间,体重或健康状况没有重大差异。这些结果对圈养野生动物常规预防接种的必要性提出了挑战。我们建议对研究人群接种疫苗的利弊进行权衡和平衡,并建议在没有症状的情况下进行定期的coproology分析,只有当寄生虫负担变为病理性时才接种疫苗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
7.70%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信