History of the Study of Skeletal Muscle Function with Emphasis on Kinesiological Electromyography

Y. Blanc, U. Dimanico
{"title":"History of the Study of Skeletal Muscle Function with Emphasis on Kinesiological Electromyography","authors":"Y. Blanc, U. Dimanico","doi":"10.2174/1874943701003010084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Study of muscles started probably when someone tried to understand how he can move from A to B and executes movements at will. Knowledge was always dependent on the technology available to conduct investigation. Religious belief had a negative impact on muscle study when interfering with dissection of human corpse. During the Italian Renaissance (end of XIV th to beginning of XVI th century), study of muscles was first descriptive, based on dissection. Artists like Leonardo da Vinci (1452-1519) and Michael Angelo (1475-1564) exaggerated the bulk of muscles. Their first concern was the influence of the volume of the superficial muscle on the surface modelling represented in their paintings and sculptures. Leonardo da Vinci multiplied the number of bundles of some muscles. Most of his representations of tendon insertions are imprecise. Leonardo da Vinci applied mechanical principles to rib, elbow kinematics and kinetics of the foot. Vesalius (1514-1574) was a medical doctor and an anatomist. His anatomical plates are remarkable because they respect most of the relationships between muscles. Then Galileo (1564-1642), Borelli (1608- 1679) and Newton (1642-1727) thought that physics and mechanical laws governed motility of animal and human body alike. Incidental discovery of electro stimulation effect on muscle in Galvani's laboratory and electric current concomitant of muscles contraction by Matteucci and Du Bois Reymond were major breakthroughs. Recording of this current was the starting point for ECG, EMG and EEG. ECG entered first in the clinic. EMG and EEG waited for cathode ray oscilloscope. The Voltaic Pile and faradic current opened the door of electrical stimulation to Duchenne de Boulogne (1806-1875). Matteucci's (1811-1868) publications inspired and stimulated Du Bois Reymond. Du Bois Reymond (1818-1889) repeated and completed his experiments on frogs. He designed a very sensitive galvanometer with which he recorded his own global EMG. EMG remained a curiosity of laboratory until Erlander (1874- 1965) and his pupil Gasser (1888-1963) improved the cathode ray oscilloscope for electrophysiological recordings. A combination of orthopaedic surgeons, engineers and physiologists in Berkeley (1945) systematically recorded EMG during gait of normal man. EMG biofeedback and phonomyography have also raised interest by clinicians. Their EMG signals processing in the time domain (full wave rectification miscalled integrated EMG) was later completed in the early '80s by computation of the root mean square on personal computers. Despite all factors minimizing the reliability of analysis based on amplitude of the EMG signals, these methods still represent the clinician's routine tool today. Since 1999, researchers have proven the benefits of muscular intensity analysis, time frequency analysis, mapping of spatio temporal activity. We deplore that the corresponding software is not available for clinicians. Multivariate methods of statistics allow the comparison of EMG patterns under pathological condition and can be helpful in differential diagnosis.","PeriodicalId":90985,"journal":{"name":"The open rehabilitation journal","volume":"3 1","pages":"84-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The open rehabilitation journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874943701003010084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Study of muscles started probably when someone tried to understand how he can move from A to B and executes movements at will. Knowledge was always dependent on the technology available to conduct investigation. Religious belief had a negative impact on muscle study when interfering with dissection of human corpse. During the Italian Renaissance (end of XIV th to beginning of XVI th century), study of muscles was first descriptive, based on dissection. Artists like Leonardo da Vinci (1452-1519) and Michael Angelo (1475-1564) exaggerated the bulk of muscles. Their first concern was the influence of the volume of the superficial muscle on the surface modelling represented in their paintings and sculptures. Leonardo da Vinci multiplied the number of bundles of some muscles. Most of his representations of tendon insertions are imprecise. Leonardo da Vinci applied mechanical principles to rib, elbow kinematics and kinetics of the foot. Vesalius (1514-1574) was a medical doctor and an anatomist. His anatomical plates are remarkable because they respect most of the relationships between muscles. Then Galileo (1564-1642), Borelli (1608- 1679) and Newton (1642-1727) thought that physics and mechanical laws governed motility of animal and human body alike. Incidental discovery of electro stimulation effect on muscle in Galvani's laboratory and electric current concomitant of muscles contraction by Matteucci and Du Bois Reymond were major breakthroughs. Recording of this current was the starting point for ECG, EMG and EEG. ECG entered first in the clinic. EMG and EEG waited for cathode ray oscilloscope. The Voltaic Pile and faradic current opened the door of electrical stimulation to Duchenne de Boulogne (1806-1875). Matteucci's (1811-1868) publications inspired and stimulated Du Bois Reymond. Du Bois Reymond (1818-1889) repeated and completed his experiments on frogs. He designed a very sensitive galvanometer with which he recorded his own global EMG. EMG remained a curiosity of laboratory until Erlander (1874- 1965) and his pupil Gasser (1888-1963) improved the cathode ray oscilloscope for electrophysiological recordings. A combination of orthopaedic surgeons, engineers and physiologists in Berkeley (1945) systematically recorded EMG during gait of normal man. EMG biofeedback and phonomyography have also raised interest by clinicians. Their EMG signals processing in the time domain (full wave rectification miscalled integrated EMG) was later completed in the early '80s by computation of the root mean square on personal computers. Despite all factors minimizing the reliability of analysis based on amplitude of the EMG signals, these methods still represent the clinician's routine tool today. Since 1999, researchers have proven the benefits of muscular intensity analysis, time frequency analysis, mapping of spatio temporal activity. We deplore that the corresponding software is not available for clinicians. Multivariate methods of statistics allow the comparison of EMG patterns under pathological condition and can be helpful in differential diagnosis.
骨骼肌功能研究的历史,重点是运动学肌电图
对肌肉的研究可能始于有人试图理解他如何从A点移动到B点,并随心所欲地执行动作。知识总是依赖于现有的进行调查的技术。宗教信仰干扰人体解剖时,对肌肉研究有负面影响。在意大利文艺复兴时期(十四世纪末至十六世纪初),对肌肉的研究首先是描述性的,基于解剖。像达芬奇(1452-1519)和米开朗基罗(1475-1564)这样的艺术家夸大了肌肉的体积。他们首先关注的是表面肌肉的体积对他们绘画和雕塑中所表现的表面造型的影响。列奥纳多·达·芬奇把一些肌肉束的数量增加了一倍。他对肌腱插入的描述大多是不精确的。列奥纳多·达·芬奇将机械原理应用于肋骨、肘部的运动学和足部的动力学。维萨里(1514-1574)是一位医生和解剖学家。他的解剖板是非凡的,因为它们尊重了肌肉之间的大部分关系。然后,伽利略(1564-1642)、博雷利(1608- 1679)和牛顿(1642-1727)认为,物理和机械定律支配着动物和人体的运动。伽伐尼实验室偶然发现的肌肉电刺激效应和Matteucci和Du Bois Reymond偶然发现的肌肉收缩伴随电流是重大突破。该电流的记录是心电图、肌电图和脑电图的起点。首先进入诊所的是心电图。肌电和脑电图等待阴极射线示波器。伏打电堆和法拉第电流为布洛涅(1806-1875)打开了电刺激的大门。马特乌奇(1811-1868)的著作启发和激励了杜波依斯·雷蒙。杜波依斯·雷蒙(1818-1889)重复并完成了他对青蛙的实验。他设计了一个非常灵敏的振镜,用它来记录他自己的全球肌电图。在Erlander(1874- 1965)和他的学生Gasser(1888-1963)改进了用于电生理记录的阴极射线示波器之前,肌电图一直是实验室的好奇心。伯克利的骨科医生、工程师和生理学家(1945)系统地记录了正常人走路时的肌电图。肌电图生物反馈和声像术也引起了临床医生的兴趣。他们的肌电信号时域处理(全波整流,误称集成肌电信号)后来在80年代初在个人电脑上通过计算均方根完成。尽管所有因素都降低了基于肌电图信号振幅分析的可靠性,但这些方法仍然是当今临床医生的常规工具。自1999年以来,研究人员已经证明了肌肉强度分析、时频分析、时空活动映射的好处。我们遗憾的是,没有相应的软件可供临床医生使用。多元统计方法可以比较病理状态下的肌电图,有助于鉴别诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信