Smoking Cessation Treatment Outcomes in Men and Women in Taiwan:Implications for Interpreting Gender Differences in Smoking Cessation

K. Hsueh, S. Hsueh, M. Chou, Ming-Shium Tu, H. McRobbie, O. West, P. Hajek
{"title":"Smoking Cessation Treatment Outcomes in Men and Women in Taiwan:Implications for Interpreting Gender Differences in Smoking Cessation","authors":"K. Hsueh, S. Hsueh, M. Chou, Ming-Shium Tu, H. McRobbie, O. West, P. Hajek","doi":"10.2174/1874941001306010001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several clinical trials of both behavioural and pharmacological treatments across Europe and the US have reported lower smoking cessation rates in women than in men, while population data and data from smokers attending routine stop-smoking services show little or no gender differences in outcome. Data from countries with a large gender difference in smoking prevalence can clarify whether self-selection could be responsible for this discrepancy. We analyzed data from a smoking cessation clinic in Taiwan, where 47% of men and 4% of women smoke. 1,090 smokers (963 men and 127 women) seeking help at a Taiwanese smokers' clinic between 2002 and 2007 received nicotine patches and up to 8 support sessions. Several baseline variables were collected together with self-reported smoking status at 3 and 6 months. Sustained abstinence rates (abstinent at both 3 months and 6 months) were significantly lower in women than in men (18.0% vs 30.3%, p=0.04), as were point-prevalence abstinence rates at both 3 (28.3% vs 38.5%, p=0.026) and 6 months (22.0% vs 35.0%, p=0.004). In a multiple regression including all baseline variables, only gender and cigarettes per day were significant predictors of sustained abstinence. In conclusion, among a cohort of treatment-seekers in Taiwan, there was a significant gender difference in smoking cessation outcomes. Given that such an effect is small or non-existent in countries where the prevalence of smoking across genders is similar, this suggests that sporadic gender differences could be an artifact of self-selection.","PeriodicalId":89289,"journal":{"name":"The open addiction journal","volume":"6 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The open addiction journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874941001306010001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Several clinical trials of both behavioural and pharmacological treatments across Europe and the US have reported lower smoking cessation rates in women than in men, while population data and data from smokers attending routine stop-smoking services show little or no gender differences in outcome. Data from countries with a large gender difference in smoking prevalence can clarify whether self-selection could be responsible for this discrepancy. We analyzed data from a smoking cessation clinic in Taiwan, where 47% of men and 4% of women smoke. 1,090 smokers (963 men and 127 women) seeking help at a Taiwanese smokers' clinic between 2002 and 2007 received nicotine patches and up to 8 support sessions. Several baseline variables were collected together with self-reported smoking status at 3 and 6 months. Sustained abstinence rates (abstinent at both 3 months and 6 months) were significantly lower in women than in men (18.0% vs 30.3%, p=0.04), as were point-prevalence abstinence rates at both 3 (28.3% vs 38.5%, p=0.026) and 6 months (22.0% vs 35.0%, p=0.004). In a multiple regression including all baseline variables, only gender and cigarettes per day were significant predictors of sustained abstinence. In conclusion, among a cohort of treatment-seekers in Taiwan, there was a significant gender difference in smoking cessation outcomes. Given that such an effect is small or non-existent in countries where the prevalence of smoking across genders is similar, this suggests that sporadic gender differences could be an artifact of self-selection.
台湾男性与女性戒烟治疗结果:解释戒烟性别差异的意义
在欧洲和美国,几项行为和药物治疗的临床试验报告称,女性的戒烟率低于男性,而人口数据和参加常规戒烟服务的吸烟者的数据显示,结果几乎没有或没有性别差异。来自吸烟率性别差异较大的国家的数据可以澄清自我选择是否可能是造成这种差异的原因。我们分析了台湾一家戒烟诊所的数据,该诊所有47%的男性和4%的女性吸烟。2002年至2007年间,1090名吸烟者(963名男性和127名女性)在台湾一家吸烟者诊所寻求帮助,他们接受了尼古丁贴片和多达8次的支持疗程。在3个月和6个月时收集了几个基线变量和自我报告的吸烟状况。女性的持续戒断率(3个月和6个月戒断)明显低于男性(18.0%对30.3%,p=0.04), 3个月和6个月的点流行戒断率(28.3%对38.5%,p=0.026)和6个月(22.0%对35.0%,p=0.004)也是如此。在包括所有基线变量的多元回归中,只有性别和每天吸烟是持续戒烟的重要预测因素。综上所述,在台湾寻求治疗者的队列中,戒烟结果存在显著的性别差异。鉴于这种影响在男女吸烟流行程度相似的国家很小或不存在,这表明零星的性别差异可能是自我选择的产物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信