A Comparison of MDMA and Amphetamine in the Drug Discrimination Paradigm

D. Harper, A. Crowther, S. Schenk
{"title":"A Comparison of MDMA and Amphetamine in the Drug Discrimination Paradigm","authors":"D. Harper, A. Crowther, S. Schenk","doi":"10.2174/1874941001104010022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study used the Drug Discrimination paradigm to assess the relative subjective experience of acutely administered 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) and d-amphetamine (AMPH). In this paradigm rats are required to respond on one lever if they have been given a specific drug (AMPH for one group of rats or MDMA for another group) vs an alternate lever if they have been administered saline prior to a session. Generalisation and substitution testing was used to establish the extent to which rats previously trained to discriminate saline vs MDMA responded to novel exposure of AMPH. Likewise, we examined the extent to which rats previously trained to discriminate saline vs AMPH responded to novel exposure to MDMA. Previous research [1, 2] has demonstrated that rats can learn to discriminate MDMA from amphetamine, thus it was expected that only partial, if any, generalisation would be observed when exposed to an untrained novel drug. In addition, we examined the effect of concurrent administration of the D1 antagonist SCH23390 had on discrimination performance in both groups.","PeriodicalId":89289,"journal":{"name":"The open addiction journal","volume":"4 1","pages":"22-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The open addiction journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874941001104010022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This study used the Drug Discrimination paradigm to assess the relative subjective experience of acutely administered 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) and d-amphetamine (AMPH). In this paradigm rats are required to respond on one lever if they have been given a specific drug (AMPH for one group of rats or MDMA for another group) vs an alternate lever if they have been administered saline prior to a session. Generalisation and substitution testing was used to establish the extent to which rats previously trained to discriminate saline vs MDMA responded to novel exposure of AMPH. Likewise, we examined the extent to which rats previously trained to discriminate saline vs AMPH responded to novel exposure to MDMA. Previous research [1, 2] has demonstrated that rats can learn to discriminate MDMA from amphetamine, thus it was expected that only partial, if any, generalisation would be observed when exposed to an untrained novel drug. In addition, we examined the effect of concurrent administration of the D1 antagonist SCH23390 had on discrimination performance in both groups.
MDMA与安非他明在药物鉴别范式中的比较
本研究使用药物歧视范式来评估急性给药3,4-亚甲基二氧基甲基苯丙胺(MDMA)和d-安非他明(AMPH)的相对主观体验。在这个范例中,如果大鼠被给予一种特定的药物(一组大鼠被给予AMPH,另一组大鼠被给予MDMA),那么大鼠需要在一个杠杆上做出反应,而如果它们在一次会议之前被给予生理盐水,则需要在另一个杠杆上做出反应。一般化和替代试验用于确定先前训练的大鼠区分生理盐水和MDMA对新暴露的AMPH的反应程度。同样,我们研究了先前训练的大鼠区分生理盐水和AMPH对新暴露于MDMA的反应程度。先前的研究[1,2]已经证明,大鼠可以学会区分MDMA和安非他明,因此,当暴露于未经训练的新药时,预计只有部分(如果有的话)会被观察到。此外,我们还研究了同时使用D1拮抗剂SCH23390对两组辨别能力的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信