The Validity of Street Terms Used to Monitor the Australian Methamphetamine Market

R. Mcketin, Jennifer McLaren, E. Kelly
{"title":"The Validity of Street Terms Used to Monitor the Australian Methamphetamine Market","authors":"R. Mcketin, Jennifer McLaren, E. Kelly","doi":"10.2174/1874941000902010030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To validate the street terminology used to describe the various forms of methamphetamine used in Australia, namely 'speed' (powder methamphetamine), 'base' (a damp or oily product) and 'crystal meth' or 'ice' (crystalline methamphetamine). Materials and Methodology: Regular methamphetamine users (N = 309) were asked which form of methamphetamine they took on their last use occasion, and this was coded as: (a) speed/powder, (b) base, (c) crystal/ice or (d) other. Participants were then asked to identify which form of methamphetamine they used from an identification sheet that included photographs of each form of the drug. Receiver Operating Characteristics were used to determine the concordance between street terms and photographs of each form of methamphetamine. Results: Street terms identified each respective form of methamphetamine in at least 85% of cases. However, these terms were more accurate in identifying crystalline methamphetamine (specificity 97%, sensitivity 93%) than other forms of the drug (speed/powder: specificity 92%, sensitivity 89%; base: specificity 92%, sensitivity 65%). This typology missed 12% of methamphetamine use occasions. Conclusion: Street terminology can accurately identify crystalline methamphetamine in Australia, but caution is needed when using the terms 'speed' and 'base' to monitor these respective forms of the drug.","PeriodicalId":89289,"journal":{"name":"The open addiction journal","volume":"2 1","pages":"30-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The open addiction journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874941000902010030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To validate the street terminology used to describe the various forms of methamphetamine used in Australia, namely 'speed' (powder methamphetamine), 'base' (a damp or oily product) and 'crystal meth' or 'ice' (crystalline methamphetamine). Materials and Methodology: Regular methamphetamine users (N = 309) were asked which form of methamphetamine they took on their last use occasion, and this was coded as: (a) speed/powder, (b) base, (c) crystal/ice or (d) other. Participants were then asked to identify which form of methamphetamine they used from an identification sheet that included photographs of each form of the drug. Receiver Operating Characteristics were used to determine the concordance between street terms and photographs of each form of methamphetamine. Results: Street terms identified each respective form of methamphetamine in at least 85% of cases. However, these terms were more accurate in identifying crystalline methamphetamine (specificity 97%, sensitivity 93%) than other forms of the drug (speed/powder: specificity 92%, sensitivity 89%; base: specificity 92%, sensitivity 65%). This typology missed 12% of methamphetamine use occasions. Conclusion: Street terminology can accurately identify crystalline methamphetamine in Australia, but caution is needed when using the terms 'speed' and 'base' to monitor these respective forms of the drug.
用于监测澳大利亚冰毒市场的街头术语的有效性
目的:验证用于描述在澳大利亚使用的各种形式的甲基苯丙胺的街头术语,即“速度”(粉末甲基苯丙胺),“基础”(潮湿或油性产品)和“冰毒”或“冰”(结晶甲基苯丙胺)。材料和方法:询问经常使用甲基苯丙胺的人(N = 309)他们最后一次使用甲基苯丙胺的形式,编码为:(a)速度/粉末,(b)碱,(c)晶体/冰或(d)其他。然后,参与者被要求从一张包括每种毒品照片的识别表中识别他们使用的甲基苯丙胺的形式。使用接收者操作特征来确定街头术语和每种形式的甲基苯丙胺的照片之间的一致性。结果:街头术语至少在85%的病例中识别出每种形式的甲基苯丙胺。然而,这些术语在识别结晶甲基苯丙胺(特异性97%,敏感性93%)方面比其他形式的药物(速度/粉末:特异性92%,敏感性89%;基础:特异性92%,敏感性65%)。这种类型错过了12%的甲基苯丙胺使用场合。结论:在澳大利亚,街头术语可以准确地识别结晶甲基苯丙胺,但在使用“速度”和“基础”这两个术语来监测这两种不同形式的毒品时,需要谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信