Improving Access to Preventive Services for Marginalized Families During Early Childhood: An Integrative Review of Inter-organizational Integration Interventions

Dawn A Smith, W. Peterson, M. Jaglarz, K. Doell
{"title":"Improving Access to Preventive Services for Marginalized Families During Early Childhood: An Integrative Review of Inter-organizational Integration Interventions","authors":"Dawn A Smith, W. Peterson, M. Jaglarz, K. Doell","doi":"10.2174/1874924000902010016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Marginalized populations exhibit low rates of preventive service use, often avoiding use of non-urgent services. Poor access to preventive and health promoting care serves to maintain inequities in health experienced by many marginalized populations. Of particular concern are marginalized families with young children below the age of school entry, when physical, emotional and psychological foundations for life-long health are being established. Many community based organizations recognize the need to improve families' access and use of preventive services. However, they are faced with a gap in understanding what inter-organizational interventions could be implemented to improve integration of services particularly focused on addressing experiences of marginalized families. Therefore, we used the integrative review method to identify and describe inter-organizational (I-O) interventions in the literature that aim to improve access to preventive services by marginalized families. As per integrative review methods, the literature was searched for research studies using qualitative, quantitative or mixed method designs, and investigating I-O interventions aiming to improve access to preventive services through increased service integration. Three levels of screening and relevance review identified fourteen articles. A conceptual model informed by socio-ecological theory was used to classify interventions as relational or structural. Results show that reports of rigorously conducted studies of I-O interventions are relatively sparse, and emphasize structural factors such as shared leadership, shared review or development of policies/protocols, changes to referral mechanisms and geographical/caseload matching. Inter- organizational interventions that influence relational factors were rare but have included: joint training/education, facilitated communication, addition of an integration role, and strategic partnerships. We suggest that combining both structural- and relational-focused strategies in inter-organizational integration intervention design may have greater impact on improving access to preventive services for marginalized families, with increased use of early childhood preventive services contributing to reducing health disparities.","PeriodicalId":88329,"journal":{"name":"The open health services and policy journal","volume":"22 1","pages":"16-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The open health services and policy journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874924000902010016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Marginalized populations exhibit low rates of preventive service use, often avoiding use of non-urgent services. Poor access to preventive and health promoting care serves to maintain inequities in health experienced by many marginalized populations. Of particular concern are marginalized families with young children below the age of school entry, when physical, emotional and psychological foundations for life-long health are being established. Many community based organizations recognize the need to improve families' access and use of preventive services. However, they are faced with a gap in understanding what inter-organizational interventions could be implemented to improve integration of services particularly focused on addressing experiences of marginalized families. Therefore, we used the integrative review method to identify and describe inter-organizational (I-O) interventions in the literature that aim to improve access to preventive services by marginalized families. As per integrative review methods, the literature was searched for research studies using qualitative, quantitative or mixed method designs, and investigating I-O interventions aiming to improve access to preventive services through increased service integration. Three levels of screening and relevance review identified fourteen articles. A conceptual model informed by socio-ecological theory was used to classify interventions as relational or structural. Results show that reports of rigorously conducted studies of I-O interventions are relatively sparse, and emphasize structural factors such as shared leadership, shared review or development of policies/protocols, changes to referral mechanisms and geographical/caseload matching. Inter- organizational interventions that influence relational factors were rare but have included: joint training/education, facilitated communication, addition of an integration role, and strategic partnerships. We suggest that combining both structural- and relational-focused strategies in inter-organizational integration intervention design may have greater impact on improving access to preventive services for marginalized families, with increased use of early childhood preventive services contributing to reducing health disparities.
改善儿童早期边缘化家庭获得预防服务的机会:组织间整合干预措施的综合回顾
边缘化人群预防性服务使用率低,往往避免使用非紧急服务。难以获得预防和促进健康的保健服务,使许多边缘化人口在健康方面的不平等现象持续存在。特别令人关切的是,在为终身健康建立身体、情感和心理基础的时候,有不到入学年龄的幼儿的边缘化家庭。许多以社区为基础的组织认识到有必要改善家庭获得和利用预防服务的机会。然而,他们在了解可以实施哪些组织间干预措施以改善综合服务方面存在差距,特别是侧重于解决边缘化家庭的经历。因此,我们使用综合回顾方法来识别和描述文献中的组织间(I-O)干预措施,旨在改善边缘化家庭获得预防服务的机会。根据综合评价方法,检索了使用定性、定量或混合方法设计的研究文献,并调查了旨在通过增加服务整合改善预防服务可及性的I-O干预措施。三个层次的筛选和相关性审查确定了14篇文章。一个由社会生态学理论提供信息的概念模型被用来将干预措施分类为关系或结构。结果表明,严格开展的I-O干预研究的报告相对较少,并且强调结构性因素,如共同领导、共同审查或制定政策/协议、转诊机制的变化和地理/病例量匹配。影响关系因素的组织间干预很少,但包括:联合培训/教育、促进沟通、增加整合角色和战略伙伴关系。我们建议,在组织间整合干预设计中结合以结构和关系为重点的战略,可能对改善边缘化家庭获得预防服务的机会产生更大的影响,增加儿童早期预防服务的使用,有助于减少健康差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信