Good Health Status of Older and Oldest Elderly in Jamaica: Are there Differences between Rural and Urban Areas?

P. Bourne
{"title":"Good Health Status of Older and Oldest Elderly in Jamaica: Are there Differences between Rural and Urban Areas?","authors":"P. Bourne","doi":"10.2174/1874827900902010018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the current study was to examine the good health status of older and oldest elderly Jamaicans as well as to determine predictors of this health status. A sub-sample of 1,069 respondents (42.4 percent men and 57.6 per- cent women) who indicated being 75 years and older were used for this study. This is extracted from a larger nationally cross-sectional survey of 25,018 respondents in 2002. The stratified multistage probability sampling technique was used to draw the survey respondents, which reflects the socio-demographic characteristic of the Jamaican population, and makes the sample generalizable on the population. A self-administered questionnaire was used to collect the data from the sample; and the interviewers were trained to collect data. The data were entered, stored and retrieved in SPSS 16.0. De- scriptive statistics were used to examine the demographic characteristics of the sample; chi-square was used to investigate non-metric variables, and logistic regression was the multivariate technique chosen to determine predictors of good health status. Two factors were found to be statistically significant predictors of good health status of older and oldest elderly re- spondents. These were area of residence and sex of respondents. Older and oldest elderly men reported a greater good health status than old and oldest elderly women (OR = 1.410; 95% CI: 1.048-1.897). On the other hand, there was no sta- tistical difference between the self-reported diagnosed (chronic) recurring illness and age cohort of the sample. Rural older and oldest elderly respondents indicated the lowest good health status (OR = 1.00) compared to other residents (ur- ban: OR = 1.670; 95% CI: 1.071-2.606; and other town dwellers: OR = 1.847; 95% CI: 1.327-2.572). Good health of this age cohort is not influenced by income or social standing, and there is a need to examine lifestyle risk factors; disease in- dicators and psychological conditions, as this may provide more answers to the good health of Jamaicans 75 years and older. A quantitative assessment has provided us with answers, but it is clear from the findings that more information is needed on this age cohort. The researcher recommends the use of qualitative methodologies to provide in-depth under- standing of those factors that determine good health of this age cohort.","PeriodicalId":89035,"journal":{"name":"The open geriatric medicine journal","volume":"2 1","pages":"18-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The open geriatric medicine journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874827900902010018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

The aim of the current study was to examine the good health status of older and oldest elderly Jamaicans as well as to determine predictors of this health status. A sub-sample of 1,069 respondents (42.4 percent men and 57.6 per- cent women) who indicated being 75 years and older were used for this study. This is extracted from a larger nationally cross-sectional survey of 25,018 respondents in 2002. The stratified multistage probability sampling technique was used to draw the survey respondents, which reflects the socio-demographic characteristic of the Jamaican population, and makes the sample generalizable on the population. A self-administered questionnaire was used to collect the data from the sample; and the interviewers were trained to collect data. The data were entered, stored and retrieved in SPSS 16.0. De- scriptive statistics were used to examine the demographic characteristics of the sample; chi-square was used to investigate non-metric variables, and logistic regression was the multivariate technique chosen to determine predictors of good health status. Two factors were found to be statistically significant predictors of good health status of older and oldest elderly re- spondents. These were area of residence and sex of respondents. Older and oldest elderly men reported a greater good health status than old and oldest elderly women (OR = 1.410; 95% CI: 1.048-1.897). On the other hand, there was no sta- tistical difference between the self-reported diagnosed (chronic) recurring illness and age cohort of the sample. Rural older and oldest elderly respondents indicated the lowest good health status (OR = 1.00) compared to other residents (ur- ban: OR = 1.670; 95% CI: 1.071-2.606; and other town dwellers: OR = 1.847; 95% CI: 1.327-2.572). Good health of this age cohort is not influenced by income or social standing, and there is a need to examine lifestyle risk factors; disease in- dicators and psychological conditions, as this may provide more answers to the good health of Jamaicans 75 years and older. A quantitative assessment has provided us with answers, but it is clear from the findings that more information is needed on this age cohort. The researcher recommends the use of qualitative methodologies to provide in-depth under- standing of those factors that determine good health of this age cohort.
牙买加老年人和最年长老年人的良好健康状况:农村和城市地区之间存在差异吗?
本研究的目的是检查牙买加老年人的良好健康状况,并确定这种健康状况的预测因素。这项研究使用了1069名受访者的子样本(42.4%的男性和57.6%的女性),他们的年龄在75岁及以上。这是从2002年对25,018名受访者进行的一项更大的全国性横断面调查中提取出来的。采用分层多阶段概率抽样技术抽取调查对象,反映了牙买加人口的社会人口特征,使样本在总体上具有普遍性。采用自填问卷收集样本数据;采访者接受过收集数据的培训。数据在SPSS 16.0中输入、存储和检索。描述性统计用于检验样本的人口统计学特征;采用卡方法研究非度量变量,采用logistic回归法确定良好健康状况的预测因子。两项因素对老年人及高龄老人健康状况有显著的预测作用。这些是居住地区和受访者的性别。老年和高龄男性报告的健康状况好于老年和高龄女性(OR = 1.410;95% ci: 1.048-1.897)。另一方面,自我报告诊断(慢性)复发疾病和年龄队列之间没有统计学差异。与其他居民相比,农村老年人和老年老人的健康状况最低(OR = 1.00)(城市:OR = 1.670;95% ci: 1.071-2.606;和其他城镇居民:OR = 1.847;95% ci: 1.327-2.572)。这一年龄组的健康状况不受收入或社会地位的影响,有必要检查生活方式的风险因素;疾病指标和心理状况,因为这可能为75岁及以上牙买加人的健康状况提供更多答案。定量评估为我们提供了答案,但从调查结果中可以清楚地看出,需要更多关于这一年龄组的信息。研究人员建议使用定性方法来深入了解决定这个年龄段人群健康状况的那些因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信