Making Do in Making Drugs: Innovation Policy and Pharmaceutical Manufacturing

W. N. Price Ii
{"title":"Making Do in Making Drugs: Innovation Policy and Pharmaceutical Manufacturing","authors":"W. N. Price Ii","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2311682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Drug recalls, contamination events, and shortages are on the rise, but drug companies still rely on decades-old manufacturing plants and processes. Contrary to widespread perceptions, drug manufacturing is typically expensive, inefficient, and non-innovative. Drug companies spend much more on manufacturing than on research and development, but the industry lags far behind the innovative manufacturing found in other industries. This lack of innovation in drug manufacturing stands in stark contrast to the innovation present in drug discovery. Drug discovery is the focus of a calibrated innovation policy that combines patents and the regulatory regime. Manufacturing lacks such attention, and the costs are great, both in dollars and in human lives. This article addresses the previously underappreciated role of manufacturing in innovation studies and policy. The stagnation of pharmaceutical manufacturing results from regulatory barriers and ineffective intellectual-property incentives. As a result of the difficulty enforcing manufacturing process patents, manufacturers tend to rely on trade secrecy instead, which reduces innovation. Making matters worse, regulation actively impedes innovative changes to manufacturing methods through substantive and procedural barriers across the lifespan of a drug. To address these challenges, this article suggests several direct regulatory reforms. It also proposes novel ways that regulation can be used to change the function of intellectual property incentives, which fit particularly well in the drug manufacturing context but could be extended to different areas of innovation policy. For example, FDA could be charged with operating a system of temporary market exclusivity for manufacturing innovation parallel to the patent system. Alternately, FDA could require disclosure of manufacturing methods to drive the industry from opacity and trade secrecy towards transparency and patent protection for innovation. A better targeted and more effective innovation policy could improve the current sad state of drug manufacturing with potentially immense economic and health benefits.","PeriodicalId":80721,"journal":{"name":"Boston College law review. Boston College. Law School","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2139/ssrn.2311682","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Boston College law review. Boston College. Law School","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2311682","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Drug recalls, contamination events, and shortages are on the rise, but drug companies still rely on decades-old manufacturing plants and processes. Contrary to widespread perceptions, drug manufacturing is typically expensive, inefficient, and non-innovative. Drug companies spend much more on manufacturing than on research and development, but the industry lags far behind the innovative manufacturing found in other industries. This lack of innovation in drug manufacturing stands in stark contrast to the innovation present in drug discovery. Drug discovery is the focus of a calibrated innovation policy that combines patents and the regulatory regime. Manufacturing lacks such attention, and the costs are great, both in dollars and in human lives. This article addresses the previously underappreciated role of manufacturing in innovation studies and policy. The stagnation of pharmaceutical manufacturing results from regulatory barriers and ineffective intellectual-property incentives. As a result of the difficulty enforcing manufacturing process patents, manufacturers tend to rely on trade secrecy instead, which reduces innovation. Making matters worse, regulation actively impedes innovative changes to manufacturing methods through substantive and procedural barriers across the lifespan of a drug. To address these challenges, this article suggests several direct regulatory reforms. It also proposes novel ways that regulation can be used to change the function of intellectual property incentives, which fit particularly well in the drug manufacturing context but could be extended to different areas of innovation policy. For example, FDA could be charged with operating a system of temporary market exclusivity for manufacturing innovation parallel to the patent system. Alternately, FDA could require disclosure of manufacturing methods to drive the industry from opacity and trade secrecy towards transparency and patent protection for innovation. A better targeted and more effective innovation policy could improve the current sad state of drug manufacturing with potentially immense economic and health benefits.
药品制造:创新政策与药品制造
药品召回、污染事件和短缺正在上升,但制药公司仍然依赖几十年前的制造工厂和工艺。与普遍的看法相反,药品生产通常是昂贵、低效和无创新的。制药公司在生产上的投入远远超过研发,但制药行业远远落后于其他行业的创新生产。药物制造方面缺乏创新与药物发现方面的创新形成鲜明对比。药物发现是结合专利和监管制度的校准创新政策的重点。制造业缺乏这样的关注,而且成本很高,无论是在金钱上还是在生命上。这篇文章解决了以前被低估的制造业在创新研究和政策中的作用。药品生产的停滞源于监管壁垒和无效的知识产权激励措施。由于难以实施制造工艺专利,制造商倾向于依赖商业保密,这减少了创新。更糟糕的是,监管通过在药物的整个生命周期中设置实质性和程序性障碍,积极地阻碍了生产方法的创新变化。为了应对这些挑战,本文建议进行几项直接监管改革。它还提出了一些新的方法,可以利用监管来改变知识产权激励的功能,这些方法特别适合药品制造的背景,但可以扩展到创新政策的不同领域。例如,FDA可以负责操作与专利制度平行的制造创新的临时市场排他性制度。或者,FDA可以要求披露制造方法,以推动行业从不透明和商业保密转向透明和创新专利保护。一项更有针对性和更有效的创新政策可以改善目前药品生产的悲惨状况,可能带来巨大的经济和健康效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信