The Siren Is Calling: Economic and Ideological Trends Toward Privatization of Public Police Forces

Karena Rahall
{"title":"The Siren Is Calling: Economic and Ideological Trends Toward Privatization of Public Police Forces","authors":"Karena Rahall","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2310389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The landmark Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United has opened the floodgates to allow unlimited corporate campaign donations, and Supreme Court doctrine is shifting back to a Lochner era economic rights focus. At the same time, there are efforts underway across the United States to privatize public services in order to alleviate what proponents claim is a shortfall in revenue due to the recession. Within those privatization efforts, public policing has become a new front, with outsourcing and wholesale privatization of the police underway. This article adds to the existing scholarship a political analysis of privatization efforts, including how lobbying and campaign financing is making wholesale privatization in the area of policing a very real possibility. This Article looks at the example of Camden, New Jersey, where the entire police force was fired and replaced with a county-wide force in order to shed pension and wage obligations, as an incubator for future wholesale privatization of the police. Considering the trend of corporate lobbying through groups like ALEC (American Legislative Exchange Council) that write model legislation and deliver it to lawmakers, as well as unlimited campaign donations, this Article traces the current trend toward police privatization. It argues that without more transparency and some limitations to such expenditures, the public cannot fully and fairly participate in decisions about whether to relinquish force-protection to private corporations since they cannot anticipate the consequences for both public safety and democratic principles.","PeriodicalId":83419,"journal":{"name":"University of Miami law review","volume":"68 1","pages":"633"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Miami law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2310389","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The landmark Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United has opened the floodgates to allow unlimited corporate campaign donations, and Supreme Court doctrine is shifting back to a Lochner era economic rights focus. At the same time, there are efforts underway across the United States to privatize public services in order to alleviate what proponents claim is a shortfall in revenue due to the recession. Within those privatization efforts, public policing has become a new front, with outsourcing and wholesale privatization of the police underway. This article adds to the existing scholarship a political analysis of privatization efforts, including how lobbying and campaign financing is making wholesale privatization in the area of policing a very real possibility. This Article looks at the example of Camden, New Jersey, where the entire police force was fired and replaced with a county-wide force in order to shed pension and wage obligations, as an incubator for future wholesale privatization of the police. Considering the trend of corporate lobbying through groups like ALEC (American Legislative Exchange Council) that write model legislation and deliver it to lawmakers, as well as unlimited campaign donations, this Article traces the current trend toward police privatization. It argues that without more transparency and some limitations to such expenditures, the public cannot fully and fairly participate in decisions about whether to relinquish force-protection to private corporations since they cannot anticipate the consequences for both public safety and democratic principles.
警笛在呼唤:公共警察部队私有化的经济和思想趋势
最高法院在“联合公民”一案中作出的具有里程碑意义的裁决打开了闸门,允许无限制的企业竞选捐款,最高法院的原则正在转向洛克纳时代的经济权利焦点。与此同时,美国各地正在努力将公共服务私有化,以缓解支持者所说的经济衰退造成的收入不足。在这些私有化努力中,公共警务已成为一个新的战线,外包和大规模的警察私有化正在进行中。本文为现有的学术研究增加了对私有化努力的政治分析,包括游说和竞选资金如何使警察领域的大规模私有化成为一种非常现实的可能性。本文着眼于新泽西州卡姆登的例子,在那里,整个警察部队被解雇,取而代之的是全县的警察部队,以摆脱养老金和工资义务,作为未来警察大规模私有化的孵化器。考虑到企业通过ALEC(美国立法交流委员会)等团体进行游说的趋势,以及无限制的竞选捐款,本文追踪了目前警察私有化的趋势。它认为,如果没有更多的透明度和对这种支出的一些限制,公众就不能充分和公平地参与关于是否将部队保护交给私人公司的决定,因为他们无法预测对公共安全和民主原则的后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信