A comparison of computational approaches for intron retention detection

IF 7.7 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Jiantao Zheng;Cuixiang Lin;Zhenpeng Wu;Hong-Dong Li
{"title":"A comparison of computational approaches for intron retention detection","authors":"Jiantao Zheng;Cuixiang Lin;Zhenpeng Wu;Hong-Dong Li","doi":"10.26599/BDMA.2021.9020014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intron Retention (IR) is an alternative splicing mode through which introns are retained in mature RNAs rather than being spliced in most cases. IR has been gaining increasing attention in recent years because of its recognized association with gene expression regulation and complex diseases. Continuous efforts have been dedicated to the development of IR detection methods. These methods differ in their metrics to quantify retention propensity, performance to detect IR events, functional enrichment of detected IRs, and computational speed. A systematic experimental comparison would be valuable to the selection and use of existing methods. In this work, we conduct an experimental comparison of existing IR detection methods. Considering the unavailability of a gold standard dataset of intron retention, we compare the IR detection performance on simulation datasets. Then, we compare the IR detection results with real RNA-Seq data. We also describe the use of differential analysis methods to identify disease-associated IRs and compare differential IRs along with their Gene Ontology enrichment, which is illustrated on an Alzheimer's disease RNA-Seq dataset. We discuss key principles and features of existing approaches and outline their differences. This systematic analysis provides helpful guidance for interrogating transcriptomic data from the point of view of IR.","PeriodicalId":52355,"journal":{"name":"Big Data Mining and Analytics","volume":"5 1","pages":"15-31"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel7/8254253/9663253/09663257.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Big Data Mining and Analytics","FirstCategoryId":"1093","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9663257/","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Intron Retention (IR) is an alternative splicing mode through which introns are retained in mature RNAs rather than being spliced in most cases. IR has been gaining increasing attention in recent years because of its recognized association with gene expression regulation and complex diseases. Continuous efforts have been dedicated to the development of IR detection methods. These methods differ in their metrics to quantify retention propensity, performance to detect IR events, functional enrichment of detected IRs, and computational speed. A systematic experimental comparison would be valuable to the selection and use of existing methods. In this work, we conduct an experimental comparison of existing IR detection methods. Considering the unavailability of a gold standard dataset of intron retention, we compare the IR detection performance on simulation datasets. Then, we compare the IR detection results with real RNA-Seq data. We also describe the use of differential analysis methods to identify disease-associated IRs and compare differential IRs along with their Gene Ontology enrichment, which is illustrated on an Alzheimer's disease RNA-Seq dataset. We discuss key principles and features of existing approaches and outline their differences. This systematic analysis provides helpful guidance for interrogating transcriptomic data from the point of view of IR.
内含子保留检测的计算方法比较
内含子保留(IR)是一种替代剪接模式,在大多数情况下,内含子保留在成熟RNA中,而不是剪接。近年来,IR因其与基因表达调控和复杂疾病的关系而越来越受到关注。一直致力于开发红外探测方法。这些方法在量化保留倾向、检测IR事件的性能、检测到的IR的功能富集和计算速度方面有所不同。系统的实验比较对现有方法的选择和使用是有价值的。在这项工作中,我们对现有的红外探测方法进行了实验比较。考虑到内含子保留金标准数据集的不可用性,我们比较了模拟数据集上的IR检测性能。然后,我们将IR检测结果与真实的RNA-Seq数据进行比较。我们还描述了使用差异分析方法来识别疾病相关的IRs,并比较差异IRs及其基因本体论富集,如阿尔茨海默病RNA-Seq数据集所示。我们讨论了现有方法的主要原则和特点,并概述了它们的差异。该系统分析为从IR的角度询问转录组数据提供了有用的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Big Data Mining and Analytics
Big Data Mining and Analytics Computer Science-Computer Science Applications
CiteScore
20.90
自引率
2.20%
发文量
84
期刊介绍: Big Data Mining and Analytics, a publication by Tsinghua University Press, presents groundbreaking research in the field of big data research and its applications. This comprehensive book delves into the exploration and analysis of vast amounts of data from diverse sources to uncover hidden patterns, correlations, insights, and knowledge. Featuring the latest developments, research issues, and solutions, this book offers valuable insights into the world of big data. It provides a deep understanding of data mining techniques, data analytics, and their practical applications. Big Data Mining and Analytics has gained significant recognition and is indexed and abstracted in esteemed platforms such as ESCI, EI, Scopus, DBLP Computer Science, Google Scholar, INSPEC, CSCD, DOAJ, CNKI, and more. With its wealth of information and its ability to transform the way we perceive and utilize data, this book is a must-read for researchers, professionals, and anyone interested in the field of big data analytics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信