{"title":"Predicting Annual Fecundity from Nest Success","authors":"T. Donovan, C. Danforth, D. P. Shustack","doi":"10.2174/1874453200801010020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nest success, the probability that a nest will fledge offspring, is a widely measured parameter in ornithological studies, and is usually estimated by monitoring the fates of nests throughout a breeding season. Because nest success es- timates are commonly reported in the avian literature, a key question in population studies is how to derive annual fecun- dity rates, F (a vital parameter in population biology), from nest success data when breeding individuals are not marked. In this manuscript, we describe a simple, recursive model that generates an estimate of the frequency distribution of an- nual fecundity rates that can be achieved for a species, given precise and unbiased estimates of nest success, the average number of young that fledge per successful nest, and three life history parameters: the maximum number of possible suc- cessful broods per breeding season (J), the maximum number of possible nesting attempts per breeding season (K), and the maximum brood size (B). We illustrate the model for 3 hypothetical species in which the average young that fledge per successful nest is 2 offspring: (1) a single-brooded species in which J =1, K = 3, B = 3; (2) a double-brooded species in which J = 2, K = 3, B = 3, and (3) a triple-brooded species in which J =3, K = 3, B = 3. In general, the frequency distributions of acceptable fecundity solutions for single-, double-, and triple-brooded species are all approximately symmetric, and are defined by Fave (the average acceptable solution), Fmin (the minimum acceptable solution), and Fmax (the maximum acceptable solution). The \"breadth\" of these distributions, or the difference between Fmin and Fmax, appears to be controlled largely by solutions where an unequal number of young fledge across attempts. However, when examining relationships between annual fecundity and nest success across the full spectrum of nest suc- cess values, we find that, more often than not, non-linear relationships characterized the association between nest success, Fmax, Fmin, and Fave. The only case where nest success predicts annual fecundity in a linear fashion occurred when J = K. Thus, the assumption that nest success is an adequate indicator of annual fecundity should be viewed with caution.","PeriodicalId":39058,"journal":{"name":"Open Ornithology Journal","volume":"74 1","pages":"20-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Ornithology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874453200801010020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Nest success, the probability that a nest will fledge offspring, is a widely measured parameter in ornithological studies, and is usually estimated by monitoring the fates of nests throughout a breeding season. Because nest success es- timates are commonly reported in the avian literature, a key question in population studies is how to derive annual fecun- dity rates, F (a vital parameter in population biology), from nest success data when breeding individuals are not marked. In this manuscript, we describe a simple, recursive model that generates an estimate of the frequency distribution of an- nual fecundity rates that can be achieved for a species, given precise and unbiased estimates of nest success, the average number of young that fledge per successful nest, and three life history parameters: the maximum number of possible suc- cessful broods per breeding season (J), the maximum number of possible nesting attempts per breeding season (K), and the maximum brood size (B). We illustrate the model for 3 hypothetical species in which the average young that fledge per successful nest is 2 offspring: (1) a single-brooded species in which J =1, K = 3, B = 3; (2) a double-brooded species in which J = 2, K = 3, B = 3, and (3) a triple-brooded species in which J =3, K = 3, B = 3. In general, the frequency distributions of acceptable fecundity solutions for single-, double-, and triple-brooded species are all approximately symmetric, and are defined by Fave (the average acceptable solution), Fmin (the minimum acceptable solution), and Fmax (the maximum acceptable solution). The "breadth" of these distributions, or the difference between Fmin and Fmax, appears to be controlled largely by solutions where an unequal number of young fledge across attempts. However, when examining relationships between annual fecundity and nest success across the full spectrum of nest suc- cess values, we find that, more often than not, non-linear relationships characterized the association between nest success, Fmax, Fmin, and Fave. The only case where nest success predicts annual fecundity in a linear fashion occurred when J = K. Thus, the assumption that nest success is an adequate indicator of annual fecundity should be viewed with caution.
筑巢成功率,即一个鸟巢孵出后代的可能性,是鸟类学研究中广泛测量的参数,通常通过在整个繁殖季节监测鸟巢的命运来估计。由于在鸟类文献中经常报道巢成功率估计,因此种群研究中的一个关键问题是如何在未标记繁殖个体的情况下,从巢成功率数据中获得年繁殖率F(种群生物学中的一个重要参数)。在这篇手稿中,我们描述了一个简单的递归模型,该模型产生了一个物种可以实现的年繁殖率的频率分布估计,给出了巢成功的精确和无偏估计,每个成功巢的平均雏鸟数量,以及三个生活史参数:每个繁殖季节可能成功产卵的最大数量(J),每个繁殖季节可能筑巢尝试的最大数量(K)和最大产卵量(B)。我们举例说明了3个假设物种的模型,其中每个成功筑巢的平均雏鸟是2个后代:(1)单个繁殖的物种,其中J =1, K = 3, B = 3;(2) J = 2, K =3, B =3的双生种;(3)J =3, K =3, B =3的三生种。一般来说,单育、双育和三育物种的可接受繁殖力解的频率分布都是近似对称的,并由Fave(平均可接受解)、Fmin(最小可接受解)和Fmax(最大可接受解)定义。这些分布的“宽度”,或者Fmin和Fmax之间的差异,似乎在很大程度上是由不同数量的年轻尝试的解决方案控制的。然而,当在整个巢成功值范围内检查年繁殖力与巢成功之间的关系时,我们发现,巢成功、Fmax、Fmin和Fave之间的关系往往是非线性的。当J = k时,巢成功以线性方式预测年繁殖力的唯一情况发生。因此,巢成功是年繁殖力的充分指标的假设应该谨慎看待。
期刊介绍:
The Open Ornithology Journal is an Open Access online journal, which publishes research articles, reviews/mini-reviews, letters and guest edited single topic issues in all important areas of ornithology including avian behaviour,genetics, phylogeography , conservation, demography, ecology, evolution, and morphology. The Open Ornithology Journal, a peer-reviewed journal, is an important and reliable source of current information on developments in the field. The emphasis will be on publishing quality papers rapidly and making them freely available to researchers worldwide.