{"title":"The documents, personal music collections, and artifacts contained in the Goldman Band Library at the University of Iowa","authors":"Boyd B. Perkins","doi":"10.17077/etd.vcpyfvfz","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Commissioned and premiered by James Keene and the University of Illinois Wind Symphony for the 1994 National MENC Conference, Epiphanies^ is cited by composer Ron Nelson as his most dissonant work. It utilizes an octatonic-based structure, with the primary scale patterns being derivative of a phone number in the same area code (217) as the University of Illinois.2 Despite this atypical inspiration, the work progresses much like the more familiar Passacaglia: Homage on B-A-C-H3, moving slowly from darkness to light, yet Epiphanies relies more heavily on the long-range motion from dissonance and octatonicism to functional tonality. The opening five measures provide the impetus for the development that will occur throughout the work. The opening D-flat, the second pitch in the octatonic set, immediately is scored against a C, but is reset against C sonorities so often, it almost functions as a separate-yetequal octatonic center, while the fundamental pitch, which will eventually become the functional tonic, remains C. These two \"tonics\" representing the two main areas of the work, are used simultaneously throughout the opening section to create tension that must eventually be resolved. This conflict creates a rich harmonic palate for the interjected fanfare motives occurring throughout the opening of the work. The first 26 measures serve to establish harmonic areas derived from both the octatonic scale based around the second tone, D-flat, and the initial dissonance established between D- flat and C. This harmonic structure expands to include half-step dissonances between F-sharp and G, as well as A and B-flat, and whole step dissonances between G and A, D-flat and E- flat, and finally B-flat and C. These dissonances function initially as isolated events, but as the texture becomes increasingly dense, the dissonances begin to function differently, with the single tone D-flat - C dissonance expanding to include groups of bi-tonal chords. This is realized through the juxtaposition of A and C set against a G diminished chord, F-sharp diminished against G diminished, and F-sharp diminished against an incomplete B-flat minor4. Measure 15 also proves to be structurally significant as it combines the pitches F-sharp, C, G, and D-flat. Interestingly, this moment5 highlights, in truncated fashion, the long-range tonal and structural issues in this work. Simultaneous F-sharp against G and C against D-flat, half-step dissonances from the opening of the work, can also be realized as F-sharp against C and G against D-flat, intervallic fifths (tritones) which foreshadow the eventual functional harmonic framework as the work progresses, even though they are still cast strongly within an obvious octatonic frame. The areas of increasing harmonic and textural complexity finally coalesce at m. 19 when the existing bi-tonality is condensed to a single ?-flat minor-minor seventh sonority. A widening of tessitura at this point, encompassing a greater span of octaves, also serves to mark this moment. Even though Nelson provides a semblance of functional tonal reprieve, he immediately begins to reestablish dissonances, arriving at m. 27 on an 1 1 -pitch chord. It is this arrival point that sets in motion the final long-range tonal goal, which will play out until the end of the work. Nelson's conspicuous exclusion of the G-natural is more symbolic than functional on a surface level, but the G-natural will eventually become the dominant of C major at the conclusion of the piece, so its absence predicts its eventual appearance as a functionally significant harmonic event at a background structural level. It is also noteworthy that Nelson would choose to foreshadow a primary shift to functional harmony in the most dissonant, atonal-seeming moment in the entire work. The arrival at measure 30 begins a second structural area. The octatonic-based fanfares now appear interspersed within chorale-like phrases that serve to highlight the gradual shifting from sporadic, and even aleatorie gesture, to more long-range motions with harmonic implications. …","PeriodicalId":42284,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BAND RESEARCH","volume":"45 1","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BAND RESEARCH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17077/etd.vcpyfvfz","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Commissioned and premiered by James Keene and the University of Illinois Wind Symphony for the 1994 National MENC Conference, Epiphanies^ is cited by composer Ron Nelson as his most dissonant work. It utilizes an octatonic-based structure, with the primary scale patterns being derivative of a phone number in the same area code (217) as the University of Illinois.2 Despite this atypical inspiration, the work progresses much like the more familiar Passacaglia: Homage on B-A-C-H3, moving slowly from darkness to light, yet Epiphanies relies more heavily on the long-range motion from dissonance and octatonicism to functional tonality. The opening five measures provide the impetus for the development that will occur throughout the work. The opening D-flat, the second pitch in the octatonic set, immediately is scored against a C, but is reset against C sonorities so often, it almost functions as a separate-yetequal octatonic center, while the fundamental pitch, which will eventually become the functional tonic, remains C. These two "tonics" representing the two main areas of the work, are used simultaneously throughout the opening section to create tension that must eventually be resolved. This conflict creates a rich harmonic palate for the interjected fanfare motives occurring throughout the opening of the work. The first 26 measures serve to establish harmonic areas derived from both the octatonic scale based around the second tone, D-flat, and the initial dissonance established between D- flat and C. This harmonic structure expands to include half-step dissonances between F-sharp and G, as well as A and B-flat, and whole step dissonances between G and A, D-flat and E- flat, and finally B-flat and C. These dissonances function initially as isolated events, but as the texture becomes increasingly dense, the dissonances begin to function differently, with the single tone D-flat - C dissonance expanding to include groups of bi-tonal chords. This is realized through the juxtaposition of A and C set against a G diminished chord, F-sharp diminished against G diminished, and F-sharp diminished against an incomplete B-flat minor4. Measure 15 also proves to be structurally significant as it combines the pitches F-sharp, C, G, and D-flat. Interestingly, this moment5 highlights, in truncated fashion, the long-range tonal and structural issues in this work. Simultaneous F-sharp against G and C against D-flat, half-step dissonances from the opening of the work, can also be realized as F-sharp against C and G against D-flat, intervallic fifths (tritones) which foreshadow the eventual functional harmonic framework as the work progresses, even though they are still cast strongly within an obvious octatonic frame. The areas of increasing harmonic and textural complexity finally coalesce at m. 19 when the existing bi-tonality is condensed to a single ?-flat minor-minor seventh sonority. A widening of tessitura at this point, encompassing a greater span of octaves, also serves to mark this moment. Even though Nelson provides a semblance of functional tonal reprieve, he immediately begins to reestablish dissonances, arriving at m. 27 on an 1 1 -pitch chord. It is this arrival point that sets in motion the final long-range tonal goal, which will play out until the end of the work. Nelson's conspicuous exclusion of the G-natural is more symbolic than functional on a surface level, but the G-natural will eventually become the dominant of C major at the conclusion of the piece, so its absence predicts its eventual appearance as a functionally significant harmonic event at a background structural level. It is also noteworthy that Nelson would choose to foreshadow a primary shift to functional harmony in the most dissonant, atonal-seeming moment in the entire work. The arrival at measure 30 begins a second structural area. The octatonic-based fanfares now appear interspersed within chorale-like phrases that serve to highlight the gradual shifting from sporadic, and even aleatorie gesture, to more long-range motions with harmonic implications. …
《顿悟》由詹姆斯·基恩和伊利诺伊大学管乐交响乐团在1994年全国MENC会议上委托并首演,被作曲家罗恩·纳尔逊称为他最不和谐的作品。它采用了八度音阶为基础的结构,主要音阶模式来自于与伊利诺伊大学相同的区号(217)的电话号码。尽管这种非典型的灵感,作品的进展与更熟悉的Passacaglia很像:Homage on B-A-C-H3,从黑暗缓慢地移动到光明,然而顿觉更多地依赖于从不协和音和八度音阶到功能调性的长期运动。开放的五项措施为整个工作的发展提供了动力。开始的降d,八音组中的第二个音高,立即以C为基准,但经常以C为基准,它几乎是一个独立但平等的八音中心,而基本音高,最终将成为功能性主音,仍然是C。这两个“主音”代表了作品的两个主要领域,在整个开始部分同时使用,以创造最终必须解决的紧张气氛。这种冲突为贯穿整个作品开头的插入式鼓声动机创造了丰富的和声。前26小节是用来建立和声区域的,这些和声区域来源于以降D音为基础的八音音阶,以及降D音与c音之间的初始不和谐。这个和声结构扩展到包括升f音与G、降A音与降b音之间的半阶不和谐,以及G音与A、降D音与降E音之间的全阶不和谐,最后是降b音与c音之间的全阶不和谐。但随着织体变得越来越密集,不协和音开始发挥不同的作用,单音降d - C不协和音扩展到包括双音和弦组。这是通过A和C的并置来实现的,它们与G减和弦,升f减和弦与G减和弦,升f减和弦与不完整的降b小调。第15小节在结构上也很重要,因为它结合了升f、C、G和降d的音高。有趣的是,这一时刻以一种截断的方式突出了作品中长期的色调和结构问题。同时升f对G和C对降d,作品开头的半步不和谐,也可以实现为升f对C和G对降d,五度音程(三全音),随着作品的进展,它们预示着最终的功能和声框架,即使它们仍然强烈地投射在一个明显的八度音阶框架内。当现有的双调性被浓缩为一个降小调七音时,和声和织体复杂性增加的区域最终在第19小节合并。在这一点上,织体的扩大,包括更大的八度跨度,也有助于标记这一刻。尽管尼尔森提供了一个表面上的功能性音调暂缓,但他立即开始重建不协和音,在11个音高的和弦上到达第27米。正是这个到达点启动了最终的长期音调目标,它将一直持续到作品结束。尼尔森明显地排除G-natural在表面上更具象征意义,而不是功能性,但G-natural最终将在作品的结尾成为C大调的属音,因此它的缺失预示着它最终会在背景结构层面上作为一个功能性重要的和声事件出现。同样值得注意的是,尼尔森会选择在整个作品中最不和谐、看似无调的时刻预示着向功能和谐的主要转变。到达测度30开始第二个结构区域。现在,八度制的喇叭声穿插在赞美诗般的乐句中,以突出从零星甚至随意的姿态逐渐转变为具有和谐含义的更长时间的动作。…
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Band Research is an official publication of the American Bandmasters Association and was begun in 1964. The Journal is published twice a year, in the Fall and in the Spring, by Troy University in Troy, Alabama. The Journal of Band Research is the premiere scholarly publication devoted to band music, band history and band methodology in the world. Articles accepted for publication in the JBR receive peer scrutiny by a distinguished editorial review board. Instructions regarding how to submit an article are contained on this website.