Who burnt Słupsk in March 1945? A case of a Pomeranian town captured by Red Army

Q4 Arts and Humanities
W. Skóra
{"title":"Who burnt Słupsk in March 1945? A case of a Pomeranian town captured by Red Army","authors":"W. Skóra","doi":"10.18276/pz.2021.36-06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Undefended by the Germans, Słupsk suffered heavy losses during the World War II, which changed forever the town’s building s. The inhabitants, both the former and the present, the Germans and the Poles, have for decades asked who is to blame as there was no fighting? According to the history of Słupsk edited by Stanisław Gierszewski – until this day the basic synthesis of the town’s history – 25–30 per cent of Słupsk was destroyed in March 1945 as a result of Red Army fights with the German s. These fights were described. During the Polish People’s Republic period a whispered word of mouth history existed in the background of these false statement s. According to this construc tion, it were the Red Army soldiers who set the undefended Słupsk on fire several hours after capturing the town. Such conclusion was drawn from the memories of the Germans, the Polish pioneer settlers in Słupsk, and from the West German historiography. After the collapse of communism, the word of mouth version, more and more precisely described and justified, was commonly accepted. It was accepted with bitterness, as Słupsk, re garded one of more beautiful Pomeranian towns, “could survive”, because its devasta tion was not a consequence of military action. It was ascribed to the „barbarism” of the Soviets. This belief can be revised under the influence of the memories of the Germans, published in the 1950s in a journal of the “expellees” from Słupsk, „Stolper Heimatblatt”. Issue 6 contains a letter from Margaret Dähling who eye-witnessed the described event s. She was in the city centre when it went up in flame s. Her report is surprising, it contra dicts the commonly accepted belief s. The course of events immediately after entrance of the Soviet troops could have been more complex, and the perpetrators could have differ ent motivation than it is assumed.","PeriodicalId":34688,"journal":{"name":"Przeglad Zachodniopomorski","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przeglad Zachodniopomorski","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18276/pz.2021.36-06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Undefended by the Germans, Słupsk suffered heavy losses during the World War II, which changed forever the town’s building s. The inhabitants, both the former and the present, the Germans and the Poles, have for decades asked who is to blame as there was no fighting? According to the history of Słupsk edited by Stanisław Gierszewski – until this day the basic synthesis of the town’s history – 25–30 per cent of Słupsk was destroyed in March 1945 as a result of Red Army fights with the German s. These fights were described. During the Polish People’s Republic period a whispered word of mouth history existed in the background of these false statement s. According to this construc tion, it were the Red Army soldiers who set the undefended Słupsk on fire several hours after capturing the town. Such conclusion was drawn from the memories of the Germans, the Polish pioneer settlers in Słupsk, and from the West German historiography. After the collapse of communism, the word of mouth version, more and more precisely described and justified, was commonly accepted. It was accepted with bitterness, as Słupsk, re garded one of more beautiful Pomeranian towns, “could survive”, because its devasta tion was not a consequence of military action. It was ascribed to the „barbarism” of the Soviets. This belief can be revised under the influence of the memories of the Germans, published in the 1950s in a journal of the “expellees” from Słupsk, „Stolper Heimatblatt”. Issue 6 contains a letter from Margaret Dähling who eye-witnessed the described event s. She was in the city centre when it went up in flame s. Her report is surprising, it contra dicts the commonly accepted belief s. The course of events immediately after entrance of the Soviet troops could have been more complex, and the perpetrators could have differ ent motivation than it is assumed.
1945年3月谁烧了Słupsk ?一个波美拉尼亚小镇被红军占领的案例
由于没有德国人的防御,Słupsk在第二次世界大战期间遭受了重大损失,这永远改变了该镇的建筑。居民,无论是以前的还是现在的,德国人和波兰人,几十年来一直在问,既然没有战争,谁应该受到指责?根据Stanisław Gierszewski编辑的Słupsk历史- - -直到今天仍是该镇历史的基本综合- - - 1945年3月,由于红军与德国人的战斗,Słupsk的25% - 30%被摧毁。这些战斗都有描述。在波兰人民共和国时期,在这些虚假陈述的背景下存在着一段口口相传的历史。根据这种说法,是红军士兵在占领该镇几个小时后放火焚烧了不加防御的Słupsk。这是德国人、Słupsk的波兰拓荒者的记忆和西德史学的结论。共产主义垮台后,口口相传的版本被越来越精确地描述和证明,被普遍接受。它被苦涩地接受了,因为Słupsk认为它是一个美丽的波美拉尼亚城镇,“可以生存”,因为它的破坏不是军事行动的结果。它被归咎于苏联人的“野蛮”。这种信念可以在德国人的记忆的影响下得到修正,这些记忆于20世纪50年代发表在Słupsk的一本名为“Stolper Heimatblatt”的“被驱逐者”杂志上。第6期包含一封玛格丽特Dähling的信,她亲眼目睹了所描述的事件。当它在火焰中燃烧时,她在市中心。她的报告令人惊讶,它与普遍接受的信念相矛盾。苏联军队进入后立即发生的事件过程可能更复杂,肇事者可能有不同的动机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信