Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy (OPAT) in the Kingdom of Bahrain: Efficacy, Patient Satisfaction and Cost Effectiveness

A. Ansari, S. A. Alawi, M. Qahtani, A. Darwish
{"title":"Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy (OPAT) in the Kingdom of Bahrain: Efficacy, Patient Satisfaction and Cost Effectiveness","authors":"A. Ansari, S. A. Alawi, M. Qahtani, A. Darwish","doi":"10.2174/1874279301307010090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) is an alternative method to deliver intravenous antimicrobial agents to patients requiring parenteral therapy without an overnight hospital stay. The aim of this study was to review the OPAT services, to explore patient satisfaction with the services provided, and to determine cost effectiveness. A retrospective review for the raw data collected in the OPAT clinic between February 2012 and January 2013 was included. Patients' variables including age, sex, type of infection, and service costs were analyzed with descriptive statistics. Each patient's eligibility was assessed by an infectious disease physician (ID), and a family physician. Patient's satisfaction was measured by a modified short version patient satisfaction questionnaire. Cost was calculated for each patient in the OPAT clinic and compared to the actual cost if the same patient was admitted and treated in the hospital. During the last 12 months, 101 patients, 92 adults, and nine children were treated in our OPAT clinic. Half (50%) of the patients were referred from general practitioner services and our emergency department. Ceftriaxone was the most frequently used antibiotic, prescribed to 76% of the patients. Successful cure was achieved in 97 treated patients. Patients were highly satisfied with the OPAT service with the mean rating of 4.41 SD + 0.31. Cost was reduced from $75, 000 to $30, 000 over one year. This retrospective study suggested that OPAT service is safe and potentially a cost saving approach for the health care system. OPAT service is acceptable and well tolerated among patients receiving intravenous antimicrobial agents.","PeriodicalId":88330,"journal":{"name":"The open infectious diseases journal","volume":"7 1","pages":"90-95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The open infectious diseases journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874279301307010090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) is an alternative method to deliver intravenous antimicrobial agents to patients requiring parenteral therapy without an overnight hospital stay. The aim of this study was to review the OPAT services, to explore patient satisfaction with the services provided, and to determine cost effectiveness. A retrospective review for the raw data collected in the OPAT clinic between February 2012 and January 2013 was included. Patients' variables including age, sex, type of infection, and service costs were analyzed with descriptive statistics. Each patient's eligibility was assessed by an infectious disease physician (ID), and a family physician. Patient's satisfaction was measured by a modified short version patient satisfaction questionnaire. Cost was calculated for each patient in the OPAT clinic and compared to the actual cost if the same patient was admitted and treated in the hospital. During the last 12 months, 101 patients, 92 adults, and nine children were treated in our OPAT clinic. Half (50%) of the patients were referred from general practitioner services and our emergency department. Ceftriaxone was the most frequently used antibiotic, prescribed to 76% of the patients. Successful cure was achieved in 97 treated patients. Patients were highly satisfied with the OPAT service with the mean rating of 4.41 SD + 0.31. Cost was reduced from $75, 000 to $30, 000 over one year. This retrospective study suggested that OPAT service is safe and potentially a cost saving approach for the health care system. OPAT service is acceptable and well tolerated among patients receiving intravenous antimicrobial agents.
巴林王国门诊静脉注射抗菌药物治疗(OPAT):疗效、患者满意度和成本效益
门诊外肠外抗菌药物治疗(OPAT)是向需要肠外治疗的患者提供静脉注射抗菌药物的一种替代方法,无需过夜住院。本研究的目的是回顾OPAT服务,探索患者对所提供服务的满意度,并确定成本效益。对2012年2月至2013年1月期间在OPAT诊所收集的原始数据进行回顾性审查。对患者年龄、性别、感染类型、服务费用等变量进行描述性统计分析。每位患者的资格由传染病医生(ID)和家庭医生评估。采用修改后的短版患者满意度问卷测量患者满意度。计算了OPAT诊所每位患者的费用,并将同一患者在医院住院和治疗时的费用与实际费用进行了比较。在过去的12个月里,我们的OPAT诊所治疗了101名患者,92名成人和9名儿童。一半(50%)的患者是从全科医生服务和我们的急诊科转介的。头孢曲松是最常用的抗生素,76%的患者开了这种药。97例患者成功治愈。患者对OPAT服务非常满意,平均评分为4.41 SD + 0.31。成本在一年内从75,000美元减少到30,000美元。这项回顾性研究表明,OPAT服务是安全的,并有可能为卫生保健系统节省成本。OPAT服务在接受静脉注射抗菌剂的患者中是可接受和耐受良好的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信