MOOCs and Legal Education: Valuable Innovation or Looming Disaster?

Philip G. Schrag
{"title":"MOOCs and Legal Education: Valuable Innovation or Looming Disaster?","authors":"Philip G. Schrag","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2278261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Massive open online courses (MOOCs) have spread across the landscape of higher education like an invasive plant species. Although few people had heard of MOOCs before 2012, these internet-based courses, taught by university professors, are now routinely offered simultaneously to tens of thousands or in some cases, hundreds of thousands of people. Most MOOCs are still provided free of charge, but the two companies and one non-profit entity that promote MOOCs and provide the software have recently created partnerships with institutions of higher education in order to realize substantial revenues by offering MOOCs for academic credit to tuition-paying students at colleges and universities. Despite resistance from professors at some institutions, MOOCs for credit are proliferating rapidly. This development has great significance for the future of legal education, because most law schools are experiencing an economic crisis and are searching for ways to cut costs and lower tuition so that they can fill their classes and remain viable. Already, some law schools are offering academic credit for distance learning, within limits permitted by the Section of Legal Education of the American Bar Association — limits that may soon be relaxed. Within ten years, MOOCs could replace traditional law school classes altogether, except at a few elite law schools that produce lawyers to serve large corporations and wealthy individuals. However, most law schools might survive by embracing rather than resisting internet-based learning. They could cut costs by reducing faculty and staff positions, using MOOCs for the delivery of most of the legal information that students need, hiring part-time lawyers to help students with exercises to supplement the MOOCs, and concentrating the remaining full-time faculty on first-semester offerings, writing seminars, and clinics. Sadly, the result will be a watered-down form of legal education compared to the three years of interactive experiences that law schools have offered students for the last century. But it may be the only way in which most law schools can survive.","PeriodicalId":83467,"journal":{"name":"Villanova law review","volume":"59 1","pages":"83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Villanova law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2278261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Massive open online courses (MOOCs) have spread across the landscape of higher education like an invasive plant species. Although few people had heard of MOOCs before 2012, these internet-based courses, taught by university professors, are now routinely offered simultaneously to tens of thousands or in some cases, hundreds of thousands of people. Most MOOCs are still provided free of charge, but the two companies and one non-profit entity that promote MOOCs and provide the software have recently created partnerships with institutions of higher education in order to realize substantial revenues by offering MOOCs for academic credit to tuition-paying students at colleges and universities. Despite resistance from professors at some institutions, MOOCs for credit are proliferating rapidly. This development has great significance for the future of legal education, because most law schools are experiencing an economic crisis and are searching for ways to cut costs and lower tuition so that they can fill their classes and remain viable. Already, some law schools are offering academic credit for distance learning, within limits permitted by the Section of Legal Education of the American Bar Association — limits that may soon be relaxed. Within ten years, MOOCs could replace traditional law school classes altogether, except at a few elite law schools that produce lawyers to serve large corporations and wealthy individuals. However, most law schools might survive by embracing rather than resisting internet-based learning. They could cut costs by reducing faculty and staff positions, using MOOCs for the delivery of most of the legal information that students need, hiring part-time lawyers to help students with exercises to supplement the MOOCs, and concentrating the remaining full-time faculty on first-semester offerings, writing seminars, and clinics. Sadly, the result will be a watered-down form of legal education compared to the three years of interactive experiences that law schools have offered students for the last century. But it may be the only way in which most law schools can survive.
mooc与法律教育:有价值的创新还是迫在眉睫的灾难?
大规模在线开放课程(MOOCs)就像入侵的植物一样,在高等教育领域蔓延开来。虽然在2012年之前很少有人听说过mooc,但这些由大学教授讲授的基于互联网的课程,现在通常同时提供给数万人,有时甚至是数十万人。大多数mooc仍然是免费提供的,但这两家公司和一家提供mooc软件和推广mooc的非营利实体最近与高等教育机构建立了合作关系,目的是通过向高校支付学费的学生提供mooc学分来实现可观的收入。尽管受到一些机构教授的抵制,但以学分为目的的mooc正在迅速普及。这一发展对法律教育的未来具有重要意义,因为大多数法学院正在经历经济危机,并正在寻找削减成本和降低学费的方法,以便他们能够填补课程并保持活力。一些法学院已经开始在美国律师协会法律教育部允许的范围内为远程学习提供学分——这些限制可能很快就会放宽。在十年内,mooc可能会完全取代传统的法学院课程,除了少数培养律师为大公司和富人服务的精英法学院。然而,大多数法学院可能会通过接受而不是抵制互联网学习而生存下来。他们可以通过减少教职员工的职位,利用mooc来提供学生所需的大部分法律信息,雇佣兼职律师来帮助学生练习,以补充mooc,并将剩余的全职教师集中在第一学期的课程、写作研讨会和诊所上,从而降低成本。可悲的是,与上个世纪法学院为学生提供的三年互动体验相比,其结果将是一种被淡化的法律教育形式。但这可能是大多数法学院能够生存的唯一途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书