Wolves, Elk, Bison, and Secondary Trophic Cascades in Yellowstone National Park

Q2 Environmental Science
W. Ripple, Luke E. Painter, R. Beschta, C. Gates
{"title":"Wolves, Elk, Bison, and Secondary Trophic Cascades in Yellowstone National Park","authors":"W. Ripple, Luke E. Painter, R. Beschta, C. Gates","doi":"10.2174/1874213001003030031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wolves were reintroduced into Yellowstone National Park in 1995/96, likely reestablishing a trophic cascade involving wolves, elk, and woody browse species. The return of wolves may have also triggered a secondary trophic cascade involving bison, which are generally a minor prey species for wolves in northern Yellowstone. We hypothesize a sequence of events in northern Yellowstone where: 1) wolves prey on elk, changing elk behavior and reducing elk numbers, 2) causing reduced elk herbivory and more forage available to bison, and 3) allowing higher bison densities and additional bison effects on the ecosystem. This secondary trophic cascade, whereby wolf predation may have indirectly allowed bison numbers to increase through a reduction in inter-specific competition with elk, may represent an example of an alternative top-down pathway by which predators can influence multiple trophic levels through mediating the competitive interaction between two prey species. Both wolves and bison can have important effects on ecosystems, and there is growing interest in restoring these animals to wider portions of their former range. However, there are many potential routes for interactions between species and it is important to consider the conservation implications of other cascading effects when reintroducing such ecologically influential species into wild landscapes. The potential benefits of bison to their native ecosystems may not be realized in situations with low predation pressure, high bison densities, and constraints on bison movement and migration, thus likely contributing to impairment of resources.","PeriodicalId":39335,"journal":{"name":"Open Ecology Journal","volume":"3 1","pages":"31-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Ecology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874213001003030031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

Wolves were reintroduced into Yellowstone National Park in 1995/96, likely reestablishing a trophic cascade involving wolves, elk, and woody browse species. The return of wolves may have also triggered a secondary trophic cascade involving bison, which are generally a minor prey species for wolves in northern Yellowstone. We hypothesize a sequence of events in northern Yellowstone where: 1) wolves prey on elk, changing elk behavior and reducing elk numbers, 2) causing reduced elk herbivory and more forage available to bison, and 3) allowing higher bison densities and additional bison effects on the ecosystem. This secondary trophic cascade, whereby wolf predation may have indirectly allowed bison numbers to increase through a reduction in inter-specific competition with elk, may represent an example of an alternative top-down pathway by which predators can influence multiple trophic levels through mediating the competitive interaction between two prey species. Both wolves and bison can have important effects on ecosystems, and there is growing interest in restoring these animals to wider portions of their former range. However, there are many potential routes for interactions between species and it is important to consider the conservation implications of other cascading effects when reintroducing such ecologically influential species into wild landscapes. The potential benefits of bison to their native ecosystems may not be realized in situations with low predation pressure, high bison densities, and constraints on bison movement and migration, thus likely contributing to impairment of resources.
黄石国家公园的狼、麋鹿、野牛和二级营养级联
1995年至1996年,狼被重新引入黄石国家公园,可能重建了一个包括狼、麋鹿和木质browse物种的营养级联。狼的回归可能还引发了涉及野牛的二级营养级联反应,野牛通常是黄石公园北部狼的次要猎物。我们假设了黄石公园北部的一系列事件:1)狼捕食麋鹿,改变了麋鹿的行为,减少了麋鹿的数量;2)导致麋鹿的食草性减少,而野牛可以获得更多的饲料;3)允许更高的野牛密度,并对生态系统产生额外的野牛影响。这种二级营养级联,即狼的捕食可能通过减少与麋鹿的种间竞争而间接地使野牛数量增加,可能代表了另一种自上而下途径的例子,即捕食者可以通过调节两个猎物物种之间的竞争相互作用来影响多个营养水平。狼和野牛都能对生态系统产生重要影响,人们越来越有兴趣将这些动物恢复到它们以前活动范围的更大范围。然而,物种之间的相互作用有许多潜在的途径,在将这些具有生态影响的物种重新引入野生景观时,考虑其他级联效应的保护意义是很重要的。在低捕食压力、高野牛密度和限制野牛运动和迁徙的情况下,野牛对当地生态系统的潜在益处可能无法实现,从而可能导致资源的损害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Ecology Journal
Open Ecology Journal Environmental Science-Environmental Science (all)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Open Ecology Journal is an open access online journal which embraces the trans-disciplinary nature of ecology, seeking to publish original research articles, reviews, letters and guest edited single topic issues representing important scientific progress from all areas of ecology and its linkages to other fields. The journal also focuses on the basic principles of the natural environment and its conservation. Contributions may be based on any taxa, natural or artificial environments, biodiversity, spatial scales, temporal scales, and methods that advance this multi-faceted and dynamic science. The Open Ecology Journal also considers empirical and theoretical studies that promote the construction of a broadly applicable conceptual framework or that present rigorous tests or novel applications of ecological theory.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信