Religious freedom in the context of Christian religious minorities in the MENA region

Justyna Salamon
{"title":"Religious freedom in the context of Christian religious minorities in the MENA region","authors":"Justyna Salamon","doi":"10.18276/cto.2021.37-11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary The aim of this article is to analyse the religious, social, and political situation of Christians in Muslim countries in the MENA region (North Africa and the Middle East). The first part of this article presents considerations and definitions. In addition to the historical outline, infor-mation relating to the contemporary situation during the COVID-19 pandemic is presented. The focus of the research was to answer the question of how the situation of Christians has changed. Did the restrictions introduced affect the celebration of religious practices? Were Christians discriminated against in accessing health care and social assistance? Attention was also paid to the statistical data published both by the Christian non-profit organisation “Open Doors” and by the American non-profit organisation “Freedom House.” This article uses the historical method, also known as the genetic method. Its main purpose is a chrono-logical description of the evolution of the status of religious minorities in Muslim countries. A comparative method devised by Arendt Lijphart was also used. Romanian religious scholar Mircea Eliade was also a proponent of combining the comparative and historical methods. Eliade believed that religious studies should use two mutually complementary methods: the phenomenological description of religious structures and the historical-comparative method – a holistic approach to religion. In the context of research, the general concept of man, according to which he is a religious being (“homo religiosus”), is relevant. Reference was made to relevant Spanish-language. The last part of the article compares the persecution of Christians with the phenomenon of Islamophobia to show the similarities or differences between the two negative phenomena.","PeriodicalId":33689,"journal":{"name":"Colloquia Theologica Ottoniana","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Colloquia Theologica Ottoniana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18276/cto.2021.37-11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary The aim of this article is to analyse the religious, social, and political situation of Christians in Muslim countries in the MENA region (North Africa and the Middle East). The first part of this article presents considerations and definitions. In addition to the historical outline, infor-mation relating to the contemporary situation during the COVID-19 pandemic is presented. The focus of the research was to answer the question of how the situation of Christians has changed. Did the restrictions introduced affect the celebration of religious practices? Were Christians discriminated against in accessing health care and social assistance? Attention was also paid to the statistical data published both by the Christian non-profit organisation “Open Doors” and by the American non-profit organisation “Freedom House.” This article uses the historical method, also known as the genetic method. Its main purpose is a chrono-logical description of the evolution of the status of religious minorities in Muslim countries. A comparative method devised by Arendt Lijphart was also used. Romanian religious scholar Mircea Eliade was also a proponent of combining the comparative and historical methods. Eliade believed that religious studies should use two mutually complementary methods: the phenomenological description of religious structures and the historical-comparative method – a holistic approach to religion. In the context of research, the general concept of man, according to which he is a religious being (“homo religiosus”), is relevant. Reference was made to relevant Spanish-language. The last part of the article compares the persecution of Christians with the phenomenon of Islamophobia to show the similarities or differences between the two negative phenomena.
中东和北非地区基督教少数宗教背景下的宗教自由
本文的目的是分析中东和北非地区穆斯林国家基督徒的宗教、社会和政治状况。本文的第一部分介绍了注意事项和定义。除了历史概述外,还介绍了与COVID-19大流行期间的当代形势有关的信息。这项研究的重点是回答基督徒的处境是如何变化的问题。引入的限制是否影响了宗教活动的庆祝?基督徒在获得医疗保健和社会援助方面受到歧视吗?基督教非营利组织“敞开的门”和美国非营利组织“自由之家”公布的统计数据也引起了人们的注意。本文采用历史方法,也称为遗传方法。其主要目的是按时间顺序描述穆斯林国家宗教少数群体地位的演变。Arendt Lijphart设计的一种比较方法也被使用。罗马尼亚宗教学者米尔恰·埃利亚德(Mircea Eliade)也是将比较方法和历史方法结合起来的支持者。Eliade认为,宗教研究应该使用两种相辅相成的方法:对宗教结构的现象学描述和历史比较方法——一种对宗教的整体方法。在研究的背景下,人的一般概念,根据他是一个宗教存在(“homo religiosus”),是相关的。提到了有关的西班牙文。文章的最后一部分比较了对基督徒的迫害和对伊斯兰教的恐惧,以显示这两种负面现象的异同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信