Reliability of the Coach’s Eye Goniometer Application during Squat Exercise

Q4 Health Professions
Jonathan W Kilgallon, Joseph Cave, Emily J. Cushion, S. Joffe, J. Tallent
{"title":"Reliability of the Coach’s Eye Goniometer Application during Squat Exercise","authors":"Jonathan W Kilgallon, Joseph Cave, Emily J. Cushion, S. Joffe, J. Tallent","doi":"10.18276/cej.2022.2-05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined the test re-test, intrarater and interrater reliability of joint kinematics from the coach’s Eye smartphone application. Twenty-two males completed a 1-repetition maximum (1-rM) assessment followed by 2 identical sessions using 5 incremental loads (20, 40, 60, 80, 90% 1-rM). Peak flexion angles at the hip, knee, and ankle joints were assessed using 1 experienced practitioner and 1 inexperienced practitioner. the acceptable reliability thresholds were defined as intraclass correlation coefficient (Icc) r > 0.70 and coefficient of variation cv ≤ 10%. the test re-test reliability of peak hip and knee flexion were reliable across 20–90% 1-rM (r > 0.64; cv < 4.2%), whereas peak ankle flexion was not reliable at any loaded condition (r > 0.70; cv < 20.4%). no significant differences were detected between trials (p > 0.11). the intrarater reliability was near perfect (r > 0.90) except for peak ankle flexion (r > 0.85). the interrater reliability was nearly perfect (r > 0.91) except for hip flexion at 80% 1-rM and ankle flexion at 20% (r > 0.77). concludingly, the coach’s Eye application can produce repeatable assessments of joint kinematics using either a single examiner or 2 examiners, regardless of experience level. the coach’s Eye can accurately monitor squat depth. Participants were allowed to use their own lifting footwear.","PeriodicalId":36509,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18276/cej.2022.2-05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined the test re-test, intrarater and interrater reliability of joint kinematics from the coach’s Eye smartphone application. Twenty-two males completed a 1-repetition maximum (1-rM) assessment followed by 2 identical sessions using 5 incremental loads (20, 40, 60, 80, 90% 1-rM). Peak flexion angles at the hip, knee, and ankle joints were assessed using 1 experienced practitioner and 1 inexperienced practitioner. the acceptable reliability thresholds were defined as intraclass correlation coefficient (Icc) r > 0.70 and coefficient of variation cv ≤ 10%. the test re-test reliability of peak hip and knee flexion were reliable across 20–90% 1-rM (r > 0.64; cv < 4.2%), whereas peak ankle flexion was not reliable at any loaded condition (r > 0.70; cv < 20.4%). no significant differences were detected between trials (p > 0.11). the intrarater reliability was near perfect (r > 0.90) except for peak ankle flexion (r > 0.85). the interrater reliability was nearly perfect (r > 0.91) except for hip flexion at 80% 1-rM and ankle flexion at 20% (r > 0.77). concludingly, the coach’s Eye application can produce repeatable assessments of joint kinematics using either a single examiner or 2 examiners, regardless of experience level. the coach’s Eye can accurately monitor squat depth. Participants were allowed to use their own lifting footwear.
深蹲训练中教练眼测角仪应用的可靠性
本研究检验了教练眼智能手机应用程序中关节运动学的测试再测试、测试内和测试间的可靠性。22名男性完成了1次最大重复(1-rM)评估,随后进行了2次相同的训练,使用5种增量负荷(20、40、60、80、90% 1-rM)。髋关节、膝关节和踝关节的峰值屈曲角度由1名经验丰富的医生和1名经验不足的医生评估。可接受信度阈值定义为类内相关系数(Icc) r > 0.70,变异系数cv≤10%。髋关节和膝关节屈曲峰值的重测信度在20-90%的1-rM范围内是可靠的(r = 0.64;CV < 4.2%),而峰值踝关节屈曲在任何负荷条件下都不可靠(r > 0.70;CV < 20.4%)。试验间无显著差异(p < 0.11)。除了峰值踝关节屈曲(r > 0.85)外,关节内可靠性接近完美(r > 0.90)。除了髋关节屈曲为80%的1-rM和踝关节屈曲为20%的1-rM (r > 0.77)外,交互信度几乎是完美的(r > 0.91)。总之,无论经验水平如何,教练员的Eye应用程序可以使用单个或2个检查人员对关节运动学进行可重复的评估。教练的眼睛可以准确监测深蹲的深度。参与者可以使用自己的升降鞋。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine
Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine Business, Management and Accounting-Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信