{"title":"SASTRA ‘MUNGKIN’: KONTESTASI SIMBOLIK ANDREA HIRATA DALAM ARENA SASTRA INDONESIA","authors":"Kukuh Yudha Karnanta","doi":"10.22146/POETIKA.10431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article entitled Sastra ‘Mungkin’: A Symbolic contestation of Andrea Hirata in Indonesian Literature Arena is discussing the literary practices of Andrea Hirata, a novelist who surprisingly popular in Indonesian literature from 2006 to present. This article aims to explicit the views and contestation of Andrea Hirata literary practices based on his views in gaining legitimacy of his works as an author. This research applies Pierre Bourdieu’s Arena Cultural Production, which assumes that literature is not just a question of aesthetics but also the struggle of positions between agents operating in the literary arena. According to the research that has been conducted, the result reveals that Andrea Hirata actually has a tendency, furthermore, obsession, in order to gain a specific legitimacy as an author (literar y figure). In doing so, Andrea Hirata impose his views about possibility in Indonesian literature. Keywords: field, Andrea Hirata, symbolic violence, legitimacy, doxa, heterodoxa","PeriodicalId":31482,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Poetika","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Poetika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22146/POETIKA.10431","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
The article entitled Sastra ‘Mungkin’: A Symbolic contestation of Andrea Hirata in Indonesian Literature Arena is discussing the literary practices of Andrea Hirata, a novelist who surprisingly popular in Indonesian literature from 2006 to present. This article aims to explicit the views and contestation of Andrea Hirata literary practices based on his views in gaining legitimacy of his works as an author. This research applies Pierre Bourdieu’s Arena Cultural Production, which assumes that literature is not just a question of aesthetics but also the struggle of positions between agents operating in the literary arena. According to the research that has been conducted, the result reveals that Andrea Hirata actually has a tendency, furthermore, obsession, in order to gain a specific legitimacy as an author (literar y figure). In doing so, Andrea Hirata impose his views about possibility in Indonesian literature. Keywords: field, Andrea Hirata, symbolic violence, legitimacy, doxa, heterodoxa
这篇名为《Sastra ' Mungkin ': Andrea Hirata在印尼文坛的象征性争论》的文章讨论了Andrea Hirata的文学实践,这位小说家从2006年至今在印尼文坛出人意外地受欢迎。本文旨在从平田文学实践中获得作品合法性的观点出发,明确平田文学实践的观点和争议。本研究采用皮埃尔·布迪厄的竞技场文化生产理论,该理论认为文学不仅是美学问题,而且是在文学舞台上运作的代理人之间的立场斗争。根据已经进行的研究,结果表明,安德里亚·平田实际上有一种倾向,而且是一种痴迷,为了获得作为作家(文学人物)的特定合法性。在这样做的过程中,安德里亚·平田将他关于可能性的观点强加给了印尼文学。关键词:场,平田,象征暴力,合法性,doxa,异doxa