Privacy as a Tool for Antidiscrimination

Jessica Roberts
{"title":"Privacy as a Tool for Antidiscrimination","authors":"Jessica Roberts","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2263583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traditionally, laws that protect privacy and laws that prohibit discrimination have been considered distinct kinds of legal protections. This Essay challenges that binary on both practical and theoretical grounds. Using the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) as a case study, it argues that lawmakers can use privacy law to further antidiscrimination goals. GINA, which prohibits geneticinformation discrimination in health insurance and employment, does more than simply outlaw discriminatory conduct. It also prohibits employers from requiring—or even requesting—their employees’ genetic information. While GINA’s privacy and antidiscrimination protections have previously been viewed as discrete, this Essay reads them in concert, arguing that restricting access to information about protected status can thwart future discrimination by denying potential discriminators the very information they would use to discriminate. Informed by this perspective, the Essay explores the advantages and disadvantages of using privacy law as a tool for antidiscrimination, in the context of genetic information and beyond. Finally, the Essay concludes that the weaknesses endemic to privacy law might be addressed by adopting an explicit antidiscrimination purpose. Thus, just as advocates of antidiscrimination may look to privacy law, advocates of privacy protections can look to antidiscrimination. * Assistant Professor of Law, University of Houston Law Center. Thank you to Aaron Bruhl, Brad Areheart, Jessica Clarke, Dave Fagundes, and Mark Rothstein for reading and commenting on drafts. I presented early versions of this Essay during the 3rd Annual National Conference on Genetics, Ethics, & the Law at the University of Virginia Law School and the 2013 ASU Legal Scholars Conference, so my gratitude likewise goes to the participants of those workshops. Many thanks to Chelsea Averill and Zachary White for research assistance and Emily Lawson for library help. ii PRIVACY 1 August 2013","PeriodicalId":75324,"journal":{"name":"William and Mary law review","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"William and Mary law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2263583","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traditionally, laws that protect privacy and laws that prohibit discrimination have been considered distinct kinds of legal protections. This Essay challenges that binary on both practical and theoretical grounds. Using the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) as a case study, it argues that lawmakers can use privacy law to further antidiscrimination goals. GINA, which prohibits geneticinformation discrimination in health insurance and employment, does more than simply outlaw discriminatory conduct. It also prohibits employers from requiring—or even requesting—their employees’ genetic information. While GINA’s privacy and antidiscrimination protections have previously been viewed as discrete, this Essay reads them in concert, arguing that restricting access to information about protected status can thwart future discrimination by denying potential discriminators the very information they would use to discriminate. Informed by this perspective, the Essay explores the advantages and disadvantages of using privacy law as a tool for antidiscrimination, in the context of genetic information and beyond. Finally, the Essay concludes that the weaknesses endemic to privacy law might be addressed by adopting an explicit antidiscrimination purpose. Thus, just as advocates of antidiscrimination may look to privacy law, advocates of privacy protections can look to antidiscrimination. * Assistant Professor of Law, University of Houston Law Center. Thank you to Aaron Bruhl, Brad Areheart, Jessica Clarke, Dave Fagundes, and Mark Rothstein for reading and commenting on drafts. I presented early versions of this Essay during the 3rd Annual National Conference on Genetics, Ethics, & the Law at the University of Virginia Law School and the 2013 ASU Legal Scholars Conference, so my gratitude likewise goes to the participants of those workshops. Many thanks to Chelsea Averill and Zachary White for research assistance and Emily Lawson for library help. ii PRIVACY 1 August 2013
隐私作为反歧视的工具
传统上,保护隐私的法律和禁止歧视的法律被认为是不同种类的法律保护。本文从实践和理论两个方面对这种二元对立提出了挑战。以《遗传信息非歧视法案》(GINA)为例,它认为立法者可以利用隐私法来进一步实现反歧视目标。GINA禁止在医疗保险和就业方面的基因信息歧视,它不仅仅是禁止歧视行为。它还禁止雇主要求——甚至要求——员工提供基因信息。虽然GINA的隐私保护和反歧视保护以前被视为是分开的,但本文将它们结合起来,认为限制获取有关受保护状态的信息可以通过阻止潜在的歧视者获得他们用来歧视的信息来阻止未来的歧视。根据这一观点,本文探讨了在遗传信息和其他背景下使用隐私法作为反歧视工具的优点和缺点。最后,本文得出结论,隐私法特有的弱点可以通过采用明确的反歧视目的来解决。因此,正如反歧视的倡导者可能会关注隐私法一样,隐私保护的倡导者也可以关注反歧视。休斯顿大学法律中心法学助理教授。感谢Aaron Bruhl, Brad Areheart, Jessica Clarke, Dave Fagundes和Mark Rothstein对草稿的阅读和评论。我在弗吉尼亚大学法学院举行的第三届全国遗传学、伦理学和法律年度会议和2013年亚利桑那州立大学法律学者会议上展示了这篇文章的早期版本,所以我也要感谢那些研讨会的参与者。非常感谢Chelsea Averill和Zachary White的研究协助和Emily Lawson的图书馆帮助。ii隐私2013年8月1日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信