Biochemical Responses of Two Soybean (Glycine max) Varieties to Aluminum Stress in Nutrient Solution

Q4 Medicine
Nafiseh Davarpanah Moghadam, V. Poozesh, A. Rezaei
{"title":"Biochemical Responses of Two Soybean (Glycine max) Varieties to Aluminum Stress in Nutrient Solution","authors":"Nafiseh Davarpanah Moghadam, V. Poozesh, A. Rezaei","doi":"10.22034/JCHR.2016.544152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aluminum toxicity is the most widespread form of metal toxicity to plants in soil acids, initially causing inhibition of root elongation and blocks absorption of water and nutrients. According to this fact that soybean has been widely used in industry, this study investigated the effects of aluminum toxicity on biochemical factors in two varieties of Williams and Katoul of soybean plant. The study was carried out in a randomized design with aluminium (0, 200, 500, 700 µM) treatments and four replications in hydroponic culture. Results of biochemical tests showed that aluminum reduced the content of photosynthetic pigments, flavonoids, phenolic compounds, anthocyanins and reduced sugars in both cultivars of soybean. The proline content decreased with increasing aluminum in var. williams, but at var. katoul increased. It seems that G. max var. katoul suffers less than var. Williams. As regards, proline accumulation under Al stress to be generally higher in G. max var. katoul; hence, these results suggest that var. katoul is more resistant than var. Williams.","PeriodicalId":15347,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Health Risks","volume":"6 1","pages":"237-247"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Health Risks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22034/JCHR.2016.544152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aluminum toxicity is the most widespread form of metal toxicity to plants in soil acids, initially causing inhibition of root elongation and blocks absorption of water and nutrients. According to this fact that soybean has been widely used in industry, this study investigated the effects of aluminum toxicity on biochemical factors in two varieties of Williams and Katoul of soybean plant. The study was carried out in a randomized design with aluminium (0, 200, 500, 700 µM) treatments and four replications in hydroponic culture. Results of biochemical tests showed that aluminum reduced the content of photosynthetic pigments, flavonoids, phenolic compounds, anthocyanins and reduced sugars in both cultivars of soybean. The proline content decreased with increasing aluminum in var. williams, but at var. katoul increased. It seems that G. max var. katoul suffers less than var. Williams. As regards, proline accumulation under Al stress to be generally higher in G. max var. katoul; hence, these results suggest that var. katoul is more resistant than var. Williams.
两个大豆品种对营养液中铝胁迫的生化反应
铝毒性是植物在土壤酸中最普遍的金属毒性形式,最初引起根系伸长抑制,阻碍水分和养分的吸收。鉴于大豆在工业上的广泛应用,本研究研究了铝毒性对大豆威廉斯和卡托尔两个品种的生化因子的影响。本研究采用随机设计,分别采用铝(0、200、500、700µM)处理,水培培养4个重复。生化试验结果表明,铝降低了两个品种大豆光合色素、黄酮类化合物、酚类化合物、花青素和还原糖的含量。脯氨酸含量随铝的增加而降低,但随铝的增加而增加。看来max var. katoul比var. Williams受的苦要少。Al胁迫下脯氨酸积累量普遍较高;因此,这些结果表明变种卡托尔比变种威廉姆斯更具抗性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Chemical Health Risks
Journal of Chemical Health Risks Environmental Science-Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信