Measuring the effects of knowledge management practices

Q3 Business, Management and Accounting
G. Turner, Clemente Minonne
{"title":"Measuring the effects of knowledge management practices","authors":"G. Turner, Clemente Minonne","doi":"10.21256/ZHAW-3959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Successful managers focus their attention on factors that are critical in establishing and maintaining an organisation’s competitive edge. The knowledge and skill of employees is one of those factors and it requires proactive management attention. Conceptually, this is achieved through Knowledge Management, a term that has existed in the mainstream of business lexicon for quite some time. Despite this, there is the conspicuous absence of a common understanding of the term that frustrates many managers. Studies have clearly established that there are three interdependent and complementary pillars that support the concept of Knowledge Management. These are Organisational Learning Management (OLM), Organisational Knowledge Management (OKM) and Intellectual Capital Management (ICM). OLM, which has so far dominated both academic and practitioner debate, concerns itself with the problem of capturing, organising and retrieving explicit knowledge, or information, and has led to the simplistic misconception that Knowledge Management only involves the capture, or downloading, of the content of employees’ minds. ICM is dominated by those particularly interested in defining key performance indicators that will measure the impact and the benefits of applying knowledge management practices. If management requires measurement this is an essential task but it can only be undertaken once an organisation has clearly established the strategy-structure-process parameters to ensure it accesses, creates and embeds the knowledge that it needs...the OKM pillar of knowledge management. This paper looks more deeply at this pillar and in particular the lack of a general integrative approach to enhancing organisational performance in this key strategic area. It considers to what extent such an approach may help an organisation more effectively manage its most relevant source of competitive advantage. With a greater awareness of the various factors allied to the managing and leveraging of human oriented and system oriented knowledge assets, some proposals are put forward to assist in developing or redefining an organisation’s intellectual capital reporting models in search of a planning, control and performance measurement system that accounts for the management of an organisation's intellectual assets.","PeriodicalId":37211,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management","volume":"8 1","pages":"161-170"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"50","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21256/ZHAW-3959","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 50

Abstract

: Successful managers focus their attention on factors that are critical in establishing and maintaining an organisation’s competitive edge. The knowledge and skill of employees is one of those factors and it requires proactive management attention. Conceptually, this is achieved through Knowledge Management, a term that has existed in the mainstream of business lexicon for quite some time. Despite this, there is the conspicuous absence of a common understanding of the term that frustrates many managers. Studies have clearly established that there are three interdependent and complementary pillars that support the concept of Knowledge Management. These are Organisational Learning Management (OLM), Organisational Knowledge Management (OKM) and Intellectual Capital Management (ICM). OLM, which has so far dominated both academic and practitioner debate, concerns itself with the problem of capturing, organising and retrieving explicit knowledge, or information, and has led to the simplistic misconception that Knowledge Management only involves the capture, or downloading, of the content of employees’ minds. ICM is dominated by those particularly interested in defining key performance indicators that will measure the impact and the benefits of applying knowledge management practices. If management requires measurement this is an essential task but it can only be undertaken once an organisation has clearly established the strategy-structure-process parameters to ensure it accesses, creates and embeds the knowledge that it needs...the OKM pillar of knowledge management. This paper looks more deeply at this pillar and in particular the lack of a general integrative approach to enhancing organisational performance in this key strategic area. It considers to what extent such an approach may help an organisation more effectively manage its most relevant source of competitive advantage. With a greater awareness of the various factors allied to the managing and leveraging of human oriented and system oriented knowledge assets, some proposals are put forward to assist in developing or redefining an organisation’s intellectual capital reporting models in search of a planning, control and performance measurement system that accounts for the management of an organisation's intellectual assets.
衡量知识管理实践的效果
成功的管理者把注意力集中在建立和保持组织竞争优势的关键因素上。员工的知识和技能是这些因素之一,它需要积极的管理关注。从概念上讲,这是通过知识管理实现的,这个术语已经在主流商业词汇中存在了相当长的一段时间。尽管如此,对这个术语明显缺乏共同的理解,这让许多管理者感到沮丧。研究清楚地表明,有三个相互依存和互补的支柱支持知识管理的概念。它们是组织学习管理(OLM)、组织知识管理(OKM)和智力资本管理(ICM)。迄今为止,知识管理理论主导了学术界和实践者的辩论,它关注的是获取、组织和检索显性知识或信息的问题,并导致了一种简单的误解,即知识管理只涉及获取或下载员工的思想内容。ICM由那些对定义关键绩效指标特别感兴趣的人主导,这些指标将衡量应用知识管理实践的影响和收益。如果管理需要测量,这是一项必要的任务,但只有在组织明确建立了战略-结构-过程参数以确保其访问,创建和嵌入所需的知识后,才能承担这项任务……知识管理的OKM支柱。本文更深入地研究了这一支柱,特别是缺乏一种通用的综合方法来提高这一关键战略领域的组织绩效。它考虑到这种方法可以在多大程度上帮助组织更有效地管理其最相关的竞争优势来源。随着对管理和利用以人为本和以系统为本的知识资产的各种因素的认识加深,提出了一些建议,以协助发展或重新定义组织的智力资本报告模型,以寻找一个计划,控制和绩效衡量系统,说明组织的智力资产管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management
Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management Business, Management and Accounting-Management of Technology and Innovation
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信