Semantic-Oriented Knowledge Transfer for Review Rating

IF 5.2 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Wang Bo (王 波) , Zhang Ning (张 宁) , Lin Quan (林 泉) , Chen Songcan (陈松灿) , Li Yuhua (李玉华)
{"title":"Semantic-Oriented Knowledge Transfer for Review Rating","authors":"Wang Bo (王 波) ,&nbsp;Zhang Ning (张 宁) ,&nbsp;Lin Quan (林 泉) ,&nbsp;Chen Songcan (陈松灿) ,&nbsp;Li Yuhua (李玉华)","doi":"10.1016/S1007-0214(10)70110-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>With the rapid development of Web 2.0, more and more people are sharing their opinions about online products, so there is much product review data. However, it is difficult to compare products directly using ratings because many ratings are based on different scales or ratings are even missing. This paper addresses the following question: given textual reviews, how can we automatically determine the semantic orientations of reviewers and then rank different items? Due to the absence of ratings in many reviews, it is difficult to collect sufficient rating data for certain specific categories of products (e.g., movies), but it is easier to find rating data in another different but related category (e.g., books). We refer to this problem as transfer rating, and try to train a better ranking model for items in the interested category with the help of rating data from another related category. Specifically, we developed a ranking-oriented method called TRate for determining the semantic orientations and for ranking different items and formulated it in a regularized algorithm for rating knowledge transfer by bridging the two related categories via a shared latent semantic space. Tests on the Epinion dataset verified its effectiveness.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":60306,"journal":{"name":"Tsinghua Science and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1007-0214(10)70110-3","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tsinghua Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1093","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1007021410701103","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the rapid development of Web 2.0, more and more people are sharing their opinions about online products, so there is much product review data. However, it is difficult to compare products directly using ratings because many ratings are based on different scales or ratings are even missing. This paper addresses the following question: given textual reviews, how can we automatically determine the semantic orientations of reviewers and then rank different items? Due to the absence of ratings in many reviews, it is difficult to collect sufficient rating data for certain specific categories of products (e.g., movies), but it is easier to find rating data in another different but related category (e.g., books). We refer to this problem as transfer rating, and try to train a better ranking model for items in the interested category with the help of rating data from another related category. Specifically, we developed a ranking-oriented method called TRate for determining the semantic orientations and for ranking different items and formulated it in a regularized algorithm for rating knowledge transfer by bridging the two related categories via a shared latent semantic space. Tests on the Epinion dataset verified its effectiveness.

基于语义的知识迁移评价
随着Web2.0的快速发展,越来越多的人分享他们对在线产品的看法,因此有了大量的产品评论数据。然而,很难直接使用评级来比较产品,因为许多评级基于不同的尺度,或者甚至缺少评级。本文解决了以下问题:给定文本评论,我们如何自动确定评论者的语义方向,然后对不同的项目进行排名?由于许多评论中没有评级,很难为某些特定类别的产品(如电影)收集足够的评级数据,但更容易在另一个不同但相关的类别(如书籍)中找到评级数据。我们将这个问题称为转移评级,并试图借助另一个相关类别的评级数据,为感兴趣类别中的项目训练一个更好的排名模型。具体而言,我们开发了一种称为TRate的面向排名的方法,用于确定语义方向和对不同项目进行排名,并将其公式化为正则化算法,通过共享的潜在语义空间桥接两个相关类别来对知识转移进行评级。对Epinion数据集的测试验证了其有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2340
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信