The First Disestablishment: Limits on Church Power and Property Before the Civil War

IF 2.5 2区 社会学 Q1 Social Sciences
S. Gordon
{"title":"The First Disestablishment: Limits on Church Power and Property Before the Civil War","authors":"S. Gordon","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2230465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Debates over the rights of religious organizations pit those who argue for “church autonomy” from state interference against those who argue for strict separation. In battles to exempt religious employers from providing birth control to employees, to debates over parishioners right to secede from a central denomination and take their church property with them, defenders of religious institutions argue that individual interests or local congregations should not determine the outcome of disputes. They argue that the rights of religious institutions have long held a key place in American life. This article challenges that claim by investigating the legislative and judicial implementation of disestablishment in the states from the 1780s to 1860. Widespread legislative and constitutional limits on the capacity of religious organizations to acquire and hold property, coupled with the imposition of lay control of church affairs through the election of trustees, imposed strict limits on the scope of religious power to protect individual freedom of conscience. After disestablishment, state involvement in church affairs increased, in other words. In this environment of intense regulation and oversight, religious life flourished and lay involvement increased dramatically. Taking seriously the focus on individual freedom of belief as a key component of disestablishment, this article rebuts the argument that American history supports broad autonomy for religious institutions. Instead, it reveals a legacy of strict oversight combined with concern for individual liberty of belief.","PeriodicalId":48012,"journal":{"name":"University of Pennsylvania Law Review","volume":"162 1","pages":"307"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Pennsylvania Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2230465","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Debates over the rights of religious organizations pit those who argue for “church autonomy” from state interference against those who argue for strict separation. In battles to exempt religious employers from providing birth control to employees, to debates over parishioners right to secede from a central denomination and take their church property with them, defenders of religious institutions argue that individual interests or local congregations should not determine the outcome of disputes. They argue that the rights of religious institutions have long held a key place in American life. This article challenges that claim by investigating the legislative and judicial implementation of disestablishment in the states from the 1780s to 1860. Widespread legislative and constitutional limits on the capacity of religious organizations to acquire and hold property, coupled with the imposition of lay control of church affairs through the election of trustees, imposed strict limits on the scope of religious power to protect individual freedom of conscience. After disestablishment, state involvement in church affairs increased, in other words. In this environment of intense regulation and oversight, religious life flourished and lay involvement increased dramatically. Taking seriously the focus on individual freedom of belief as a key component of disestablishment, this article rebuts the argument that American history supports broad autonomy for religious institutions. Instead, it reveals a legacy of strict oversight combined with concern for individual liberty of belief.
第一次政教分离:内战前教会权力和财产的限制
在有关宗教组织权利的争论中,主张“教会自治”不受国家干预的人与主张严格分离的人形成了对立。在争取免除宗教雇主向雇员提供节育措施的斗争中,在关于教区居民脱离中心教派并带走教堂财产的权利的辩论中,宗教机构的捍卫者认为,个人利益或当地会众不应决定争端的结果。他们认为,宗教机构的权利长期以来在美国人的生活中占有重要地位。本文通过调查从18世纪80年代到1860年各州的立法和司法执行,对这种说法提出了挑战。立法和宪法对宗教组织获得和持有财产的能力进行了广泛的限制,加上世俗通过选举受托人来控制教会事务,严格限制了宗教权力的范围,以保护个人的良心自由。换句话说,政教分离后,国家对教会事务的介入增加了。在这种严格管理和监督的环境下,宗教生活蓬勃发展,世俗参与急剧增加。本文认真地把个人信仰自由作为分裂的关键组成部分,反驳了美国历史支持宗教机构广泛自治的论点。相反,它揭示了严格监督与对个人信仰自由的关注相结合的传统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信