Between Peace and the Air-Sea Battle: A War At Sea Strategy

IF 0.3 Q4 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Jeffrey E. Kline, W. Hughes
{"title":"Between Peace and the Air-Sea Battle: A War At Sea Strategy","authors":"Jeffrey E. Kline, W. Hughes","doi":"10.21236/ada580444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract : In a February 2012 article published in the American Interest, General Norton A. Schwartz, Chief of Staff of the U.S. Air Force, and Admiral Jonathan W. Greenert, Chief of Naval Operations, provide solid justification for more closely integrating Air Force and Navy capabilities into an Air-Sea Battle strategy.1 We applaud the Air-Sea Battle component as the most effective means of preparing for the most challenging conflict full-scale conventional war. We propose, however, an intermediate strategy, one providing American leadership additional flexibility to avert the need to exercise the potentially escalatory strikes that the Air-Sea Battle strategy may require. Predicated on American relative strengths, particularly in the undersea domain, it is a war at sea strategy.","PeriodicalId":51874,"journal":{"name":"Naval War College Review","volume":"65 1","pages":"35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Naval War College Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21236/ada580444","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

Abstract : In a February 2012 article published in the American Interest, General Norton A. Schwartz, Chief of Staff of the U.S. Air Force, and Admiral Jonathan W. Greenert, Chief of Naval Operations, provide solid justification for more closely integrating Air Force and Navy capabilities into an Air-Sea Battle strategy.1 We applaud the Air-Sea Battle component as the most effective means of preparing for the most challenging conflict full-scale conventional war. We propose, however, an intermediate strategy, one providing American leadership additional flexibility to avert the need to exercise the potentially escalatory strikes that the Air-Sea Battle strategy may require. Predicated on American relative strengths, particularly in the undersea domain, it is a war at sea strategy.
在和平与空海一体战之间:海上战争战略
摘要:在2012年2月发表在《美国利益》杂志上的一篇文章中,美国空军参谋长诺顿·施瓦茨将军和海军作战部长乔纳森·格林纳特上将为更紧密地将空军和海军能力整合到空海一体战战略中提供了坚实的理由我们赞扬空海一体战部分是为最具挑战性的冲突做准备的最有效手段,全面常规战争。然而,我们提出了一个中间战略,它为美国的领导提供了额外的灵活性,以避免实施空海一体战战略可能需要的可能升级的打击。基于美国的相对优势,特别是在海底领域,这是一种海上战争战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Naval War College Review
Naval War College Review INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信