Analysis on Factors Influencing Geography Teachers’ Ability in Constructing High-Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Assessment Instrument

S. Suhendro, D. Sugandi, M. Ruhimat
{"title":"Analysis on Factors Influencing Geography Teachers’ Ability in Constructing High-Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Assessment Instrument","authors":"S. Suhendro, D. Sugandi, M. Ruhimat","doi":"10.19184/geosi.v6i2.21428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The teacher's ability to construct assessment instruments is a focus that needs to be considered. Furthermore, the demand of the 21st century directs teachers to set questions that are oriented to train students' abilities in higher-order thinking. However, several factors affect the ability to construct HOTS-oriented assessment instruments. This study aims to investigate what factors influence geography teachers’ ability to develop higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) instruments to measure learning outcomes. This study used a survey method with a quantitative approach. The data collection technique was field observation, and multiple linear regression was used for analysis. The results showed the linearity of teacher education regarding the length of teaching geography was 0.904, the tertiary institution was 0.009, and the background of education was 0.019. Also, teachers' certification was 0.007, their training was 0.032, and their experience in making HOTS questions was 0.047. The coefficient value of determination R, namely 0.635 means the relationship between teaching length, the linearity of their education in tertiary institutions, background, certification, training, and experience regarding the ability to develop HOTS-oriented assessment instruments is 63.5%. This means the relationship is strong, and 36.5% is another factor. This study concludes that the factors that significantly affect the ability of geography teachers in developing HOTS-oriented assessment instruments are the linearity factor of teacher education in universities, education background, certification, teacher training and experience in making HOTS questions. Keywords: Teacher ability factors; Assessment, Higher-order thinking skills   Copyright (c) 2021 Geosfera Indonesia and Department of Geography Education, University of Jember This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share A like 4.0 International License","PeriodicalId":33276,"journal":{"name":"Geosfera Indonesia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geosfera Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19184/geosi.v6i2.21428","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The teacher's ability to construct assessment instruments is a focus that needs to be considered. Furthermore, the demand of the 21st century directs teachers to set questions that are oriented to train students' abilities in higher-order thinking. However, several factors affect the ability to construct HOTS-oriented assessment instruments. This study aims to investigate what factors influence geography teachers’ ability to develop higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) instruments to measure learning outcomes. This study used a survey method with a quantitative approach. The data collection technique was field observation, and multiple linear regression was used for analysis. The results showed the linearity of teacher education regarding the length of teaching geography was 0.904, the tertiary institution was 0.009, and the background of education was 0.019. Also, teachers' certification was 0.007, their training was 0.032, and their experience in making HOTS questions was 0.047. The coefficient value of determination R, namely 0.635 means the relationship between teaching length, the linearity of their education in tertiary institutions, background, certification, training, and experience regarding the ability to develop HOTS-oriented assessment instruments is 63.5%. This means the relationship is strong, and 36.5% is another factor. This study concludes that the factors that significantly affect the ability of geography teachers in developing HOTS-oriented assessment instruments are the linearity factor of teacher education in universities, education background, certification, teacher training and experience in making HOTS questions. Keywords: Teacher ability factors; Assessment, Higher-order thinking skills   Copyright (c) 2021 Geosfera Indonesia and Department of Geography Education, University of Jember This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share A like 4.0 International License
地理教师构建高阶思维技能评价工具能力的影响因素分析
教师构建评估工具的能力是一个需要考虑的重点。此外,21世纪的需求要求教师设置以培养学生高阶思维能力为导向的问题。然而,有几个因素影响构建面向hot的评估工具的能力。本研究旨在探讨影响地理教师开发高阶思维技能(HOTS)工具以衡量学习成果能力的因素。本研究采用定量调查法。数据采集方法为野外观测,采用多元线性回归进行分析。结果表明:教师教育与地理教学时间的线性关系为0.904,高等教育院校为0.009,教育背景为0.019;教师认证为0.007,培训为0.032,HOTS问题制作经验为0.047。决定系数R值为0.635,表示教学长度、高等教育程度、背景、认证、培训、经验对开发面向hot的评估工具能力的线性关系为63.5%。这意味着关系很牢固,36.5%是另一个因素。本研究认为,影响地理教师开发面向HOTS的评估工具能力的因素是高校教师教育、学历、认证、教师培训和HOTS制题经验的线性因素。关键词:教师能力因素;版权所有(c) 2021 Geosfera Indonesia and Department of Geography Education, University of Jember本作品采用知识共享署名共享a like 4.0国际许可协议
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信